The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mel-scale sub-band modelling for perceptually improved time-scale modification of speech and audio signals
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While alignment through re-sampling either the reference or test signal to be the same duration is not suitable, due to resulting changes in pitch, it is possible to re-sample or interpolate low bandwidth representations of the signals, as shown by Sharma et al. (2017).”
From An objective measure of quality for time-scale modification of audio (2021) · cites this paper as Sharma et al., 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Scale for the Measurement of the Psychological Magnitude Pitch
Stevens, S. S., Volkmann, J., & Newman, E. B. (1937) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1915893 · Cited by 1,107
Improved phase vocoder time-scale modification of audio
Laroche, J., & Dolson, M. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing · doi:10.1109/89.759041 · Cited by 276
Improving Time-Scale Modification of Music Signals Using Harmonic-Percussive Separation
Driedger, J., Muller, M., & Ewert, S. (2014) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2013.2294023 · Cited by 64
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- 10.1121/1.1916020 · DOI
- 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1966.tb01706.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/78.492532 · DOI
- gabor, 1946, Theory of communication, IEEE Commun Eng, 93, 429
- 10.1016/j.sigpro.2015.03.025 · DOI
- flandrin, 2001, Time-frequency and chirps, Proc SP IE 4391 Wavelet Applications VIII, 161
- zwicker, 1990, Psychoacoustics Facts and Models
- 10.1109/89.482219 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICASSP.1989.266910 · DOI
- 10.1109/TASSP.1981.1163581 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICASSP.1993.319366 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TASL.2007.909444 · DOI · Paper page
- nagel, 2009, A novel transient handling scheme for time stretching algorithms, Audio Engineering Society Convention 127
- 10.1016/0167-6393(94)00054-E · DOI
- 10.1121/1.1942989 · DOI
- fitzgerald, 2010, Harmonic/percussive separation using median filtering, Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx), 1
- driedger, 2014, TSM Toolbox: MATLAB implementations of time-scale modification algorithms, Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx), 249
- 0, A demo of ?TVS approach for time-scale modifications
Cited by
A time-scale modification dataset with subjective quality labels
Roberts, T., & Paliwal, K. K. (2020) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0001567 · Cited by 4
An objective measure of quality for time-scale modification of audio
Roberts, T., & Paliwal, K. K. (2021) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0003753 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharma, N., Potadar, S., Chetupalli, S. R., & Sreenivas, T. V.
- Venue
- 2017 Twenty-third National Conference on Communications (NCC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-03
- Pages
- 1-5
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 3
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
