Cited by 13Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Functional brain monitoring via NIR based optical spectroscopy

Izzetoglu, K., Yurtsever, G., Bozkurt, A., Bunce, S.·2003·2003 IEEE 29th Annual Proceedings of Bioengineering Conference

Abstract

Cognitive activity is associated with changes in optical properties of the brain tissue. Near infrared (NIR) based optical measurements during brain activation can assess the hemodynamic changes, namely blood oxygenation and blood volume. Furthermore, near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) has recently attracted much interest, since the technology allows the design of portable, safe, affordable, non-invasive and negligibly intrusive monitoring systems. In this paper, we present experimental procedures and results of the functional near infrared (fNIR) measurements acquired from the forehead during cognitive tasks. The data is collected from subjects engaged in two standardized attention and working memory tasks, respectively, the ''target categorization'' and the ''n-back memory'' tests. In the case of target categorization, the aim is to study changes in blood oxygenation and volume level while participants are experiencing decrements in vigilance, increased lapses of attention and cognitive slowing. Data analysis results revealed that the level of oxygenation changes in missed targets is higher than the level in captured targets. The blood oxygenation and volume level changes during consistently varying "loads" on working memory were measured in participants performing the n-back test. The results show that the level of oxygenation rises with the increase of working memory load.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/nebc.2003.1216132

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1073/pnas.90.8.3770 · DOI
  2. 10.1364/OE.2.000411 · DOI
  3. mccarthy, 1997, Infrequent Events Transiently Activate Human Prefrontal and Parietal Cortex as Measured by Functional MRI, Amer Phys Soc, 1630
  4. 10.1016/S0166-2236(97)01132-6 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0959-4388(95)80029-8 · DOI
  6. 10.1162/08989290051137585 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Izzetoglu, K., Yurtsever, G., Bozkurt, A., & Bunce, S.
Affiliations
Drexel University (US)
Venue
2003 IEEE 29th Annual Proceedings of Bioengineering Conference
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2003-11-04
Pages
335-336
ISSN
1071-121X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169834812
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.95
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference (NEBEC) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
functional near-infrared spectroscopy, cerebral hemodynamics, blood oxygenation, blood volume, cognitive tasks, attention, working memory load, n-back task, sustained attention, cognitive slowing, non-invasive brain monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review