Cited by 109Software-Defined Networks and 5GAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesCloud Computing and Resource Management

Design and evaluation of learning algorithms for dynamic resource management in virtual networks

Open access
Mijumbi, Rashid, Gorricho, Juan-Luis, Serrat, Joan, Claeys, Maxim, De Turck, Filip, Latre, Steven·2014·2014 IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS)

Abstract

Network virtualisation is considerably gaining attention as a solution to ossification of the Internet. However, the success of network virtualisation will depend in part on how efficiently the virtual networks utilise substrate network resources. In this paper, we propose a machine learning-based approach to virtual network resource management. We propose to model the substrate network as a decentralised system and introduce a learning algorithm in each substrate node and substrate link, providing self-organization capabilities. We propose a multiagent learning algorithm that carries out the substrate network resource management in a coordinated and decentralised way. The task of these agents is to use evaluative feedback to learn an optimal policy so as to dynamically allocate network resources to virtual nodes and links. The agents ensure that while the virtual networks have the resources they need at any given time, only the required resources are reserved for this purpose. Simulations show that our dynamic approach significantly improves the virtual network acceptance ratio and the maximum number of accepted virtual network requests at any time while ensuring that virtual network quality of service requirements such as packet drop rate and virtual link delay are not affected.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/noms.2014.6838258

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mijumbi, R., Gorricho, J.-L., Serrat, J., Claeys, M., De Turck, F., & Latre, S.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Venue
2014 IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2014-05
Pages
1-9
OpenAlex
W2040672732
Cited by
109
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7
FWCI
7.27
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS) (publishedVersion)
  • UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Optical Network Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
Keywords
virtual network embedding, network virtualization, dynamic resource allocation, substrate network, multi-agent learning, self-organization, quality of service, packet loss rate, learning algorithms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review