Workflow extraction for service operation using multiple unstructured trouble tickets
Abstract
In current large scale networks, troubleshooting has become more complicated task due to the diversification in the causes of network failures. The increase in the operational costs has become a serious problem. Thus, manualization of the troubleshooting process also becomes important task though it is time-consuming. We propose a method that automatically extracts a workflow for troubleshooting using multiple trouble tickets. Our method extracts an operator's actions from free-format texts and aligns relative sentences between multiple trouble tickets. Finally, we show a novel approach to visualizing a workflow by mining conditional branches using clustering. We validated our method using real trouble ticket data captured from a network operation and showed that it can extract the workflow to identify the cause of failure.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Watanabe et al. [470] report a precision of over 83% using real trouble tickets obtained from an enterprise service.
“Using real trouble tickets, obtained from an enterprise service, the authors report a precision of over 83%.”
From A comprehensive survey on machine learning for networking: Evolution, applications and research opportunities (2018) · cites this paper as [470]
Cites
MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput
Edgar, R. C. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh340 · Cited by 44,662 · see citing works
Needleman, S. B., & Wunsch, C. D. (1970) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(70)90057-4 · Cited by 11,288 · see citing works
A tutorial on spectral clustering
von Luxburg, U. (2007) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1007/s11222-007-9033-z · Cited by 10,519 · see citing works
Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
Neal, R. M. (2007) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2007.s518 · Cited by 4,629 · see citing works
Process Mining: Discovery, Conformance and Enhancement of Business Processes
van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2011) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19345-3 · Cited by 1,725 · see citing works
van der Aalst, W. M. P., Adriansyah, A., de Medeiros, A. K. A., Arcieri, F., Baier, T., Blickle, T., Bose, J. C., van den Brand, P., Brandtjen, R., Buijs, J. C. A. M., et al. (2012) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-28108-2_19 · Cited by 1,207 · see citing works
Book Review: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
Nasrabadi, N. M. (2007) · Journal of Electronic Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.2819119 · Cited by 636 · see citing works
Flexible Heuristics Miner (FHM)
Weijters, A. J. M. M., & Ribeiro, J. (2011) · IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM) · doi:10.1109/cidm.2011.5949453 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
Process diagnostics using trace alignment: Opportunities, issues, and challenges
Bose, R. P. J. C., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2011) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2011.08.003 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
de Leoni, M., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40176-3_10 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Juggling the Jigsaw: towards automated problem inference from network trouble tickets
Potharaju, R., Jain, N., & Nita-Rotaru, C. (2013) · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Unveiling clusters of events for alert and incident management in large-scale enterprise it
Lin, D., Raghu, R., Ramamurthy, V., Jin, Y., Radhakrishnan, R., & Fernandez, J. M. (2014) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/2623330.2623360 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Shao, Q., Chen, Y., Tao, S., Yan, X., & Anerousis, N. (2008) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/1454159.1454193 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Resolution recommendation for event tickets in service management
Zhou, W., Tang, L., Li, T., Shwartz, L., & Grabarnik, G. Y. (2015) · IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM) · doi:10.1109/inm.2015.7140303 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
TroubleMiner: Mining network trouble tickets
Medem, A., Akodjénou, M.-I. J., & Teixeira, R. (2009) · IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM) · doi:10.1109/inmw.2009.5195946 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Hierarchical multi-label classification over ticket data using contextual loss
Zeng, C., Li, T., Shwartz, L., & Grabarnik, G. Y. (2014) · IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS) · doi:10.1109/noms.2014.6838267 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Recommending resolutions for problems identified by monitoring
Tang, L., Li, T., Shwartz, L., & Grabarnik, G. Y. (2013) · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Probabilistic text analytics framework for information technology service desk tickets
Jan, E.-E., Chen, K., & Idé, T. (2015) · IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM) · doi:10.1109/inm.2015.7140397 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boutaba, R., Salahuddin, M. A., Limam, N., Ayoubi, S., Shahriar, N., Estrada-Solano, F., & Caicedo, O. M. (2018) · Journal of Internet Services and Applications · doi:10.1186/s13174-018-0087-2 · Cited by 1,036 · see citing works
“[470] propose a method for automatically extracting a workflow from unstructured trouble tickets to troubleshoot a network fault.”
MethodA Framework for Automatic Failure Recovery in ICT Systems by Deep Reinforcement Learning
Ikeuchi, H., Ge, J., Matsuo, Y., & Watanabe, K. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS) · doi:10.1109/icdcs47774.2020.00170 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Some methods [4]–[6] are used to analyze trouble tickets, which are historical reports on the recovery process written in a natural language, and visualize them as a workflow that suggests recovery actions for operators to take.”
MethodSelf-citationSato, T., Shimosawa, T., & Himura, Y. (2022) · IEICE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1587/transcom.2021tmp0008 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“[12][13] shows a method that discovers a history of operations by automatically analyzing raw system logs.”
MethodWorkflow Extraction for Service Operation Using Multiple Unstructured Trouble Tickets
Watanabe, A., Ishibashi, K., Toyono, T., Watanabe, K., Kimura, T., Matsuo, Y., Shiomoto, K., & Kawahara, R. (2018) · IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems · doi:10.1587/transinf.2017dap0014 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationRecovery command generation towards automatic recovery in ICT systems by Seq2Seq learning
Ikeuchi, H., Watanabe, A., Hirao, T., Morishita, M., Nishino, M., Matsuo, Y., & Watanabe, K. (2020) · IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS) · doi:10.1109/noms47738.2020.9110370 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Other methods [8]–[10] analyze multiple trouble tickets (or official troubleshooting guidelines if any) and visu-”
MethodSelf-citationOpsSC: Decentralized Blockchain Network Operation Workflow for Hyperledger Fabric
Sato, T., Shimosawa, T., & Himura, Y. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain) · doi:10.1109/blockchain53845.2021.00046 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Application of AI to Network Operation
Kawahara, R., Watanabe, K., Harada, S., & Kawata, T. (2018) · Denshi Jouhou Tsuushin Gakkai Tsuushin Sosaieti magajin/B-plus/Denshi Jouhou Tsuushin Gakkai Tsuushin Sosaeti magajin · doi:10.1587/bplus.12.29 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationEvidence-Based Context-Aware Log Data Management for Integrated Monitoring System
Sato, T., Himura, Y., & Yasuda, Y. (2018) · IEICE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1587/transcom.2017ebp3396 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Sato, T., Himura, Y., & Jun, N. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.11249 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“[20] shows a method that extracts operation workflows by analyzing text-based working histories for trouble tickets.”
MethodGlisic, S., & Lorenzo, B. (2022) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119790327.ch7
- Authors
- Watanabe, A., Ishibashi, K., Toyono, T., Kimura, T., Watanabe, K., Matsuo, Y., & Shiomoto, K.
- Affiliations
- NTT (Japan) (JP)
- Venue
- NOMS 2016 - 2016 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-04
- Pages
- 652-658
- OpenAlex
- W2473285914
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 1.42
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Business Process Modeling and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Robotic Process Automation Applications
- Keywords
- network troubleshooting, service operations, unstructured text, operator actions, sentence alignment, clustering, workflow visualization, failure cause identification, network operation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review