Video Framerate, Resolution and Grayscale Tradeoffs for Undersea Telemanipulator Control
Abstract
Summary form only given. The high costs associated with a human diver working at ocean depths greater than 100m makes the use of remotely controlled visual inspection and manipulation attractive. However, long coaxial cables from the surface to the remote teleoperator cause additional difficulties. Therefore, sound communication without a tether is desirable. This form of telemetry, however, poses severe bandwidth restrictions so that its use for image transmission is in question. The product of Frame Rate (F) in frames per second, Resolution (R) in total pixels and grayscale in bits (G) equals the transmission baud rate in bits per second. Thus for a fixed channel capacity there are tradeoffs between F, R and G in the actual sampling of the picture for a particular manual control task in the present case remote undersea manipulation. A manipulator was used in the MASTER/SLAVE mode to study these tradeoffs. Images were systematically degreaded from 28 frames per second, 128 × 128 pizels and 16 levels (4 bits) grayscale, with various FRG combinations constructed from a real-time digitized (charge- injection) video camera. When subjects first saw the video pictures with which they had to perform remote manipulation tasks, they refused to believe that they could succeed. Much to their surprise, however, they discovered that they were able to perform with a considerably degraded picture. It was found that frame rate, resolution and grayscale could be independently reduced without…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The second study determined that resolution and colorscale can be low while maintaining operability, while a frame rate below 5 FPS produces considerable degradation in performance and increase in variability.
“The study determined that resolution and colorscale can be low while maintaining operability, while a frame rate below 5 FPS produces a considerable degradation in performance and increase in variability.”
From Quantifying operational constraints of low-latency telerobotics for planetary surface operations (2018) · cites this paper as [20]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantifying operational constraints of low-latency telerobotics for planetary surface operations
Mellinkoff, B. J., Spydell, M. M., Bailey, W., & Burns, J. O. (2018) · 2018 IEEE Aerospace Conference · doi:10.1109/aero.2018.8396673 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ranadive, V., & Sheridan, T.
- Affiliations
- Link-a-Bit, Co., San Diego, CA, USA
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- OCEANS 81
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 1981
- Pages
- 1222-1222
- OpenAlex
- W1964346171
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- MTS/IEEE OCEANS Conference (OCEANS) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
- Keywords
- teleoperation, video frame rate, image resolution, bandwidth constraints, image degradation, operator performance, underwater acoustic telemetry, master-slave teleoperation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review