Cited by 345Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataCOVID-19 diagnosis using AIIoT and Edge/Fog Computing

Collaborative Federated Learning for Healthcare: Multi-Modal COVID-19 Diagnosis at the Edge

Open access
Qayyum, Adnan, Ahmad, Kashif, Ahsan, Muhammad Ahtazaz, Al-Fuqaha, Ala, Qadir, Junaid·2022·IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society

Abstract

Despite significant improvements over the last few years, cloud-based healthcare applications continue to suffer from poor adoption due to their limitations in meeting stringent security, privacy, and quality of service requirements (such as low latency). The edge computing trend, along with techniques for distributed machine learning such as federated learning, has gained popularity as a viable solution in such settings. In this paper, we leverage the capabilities of edge computing in medicine by evaluating the potential of intelligent processing of clinical data at the edge. We utilized the emerging concept of clustered federated learning (CFL) for an automatic COVID-19 diagnosis. We evaluate the performance of the proposed framework under different experimental setups on two benchmark datasets. Promising results are obtained on both datasets resulting in comparable results against the central baseline where the specialized models (i.e., each on a specific image modality) are trained with central data, and improvements of 16% and 11% in overall F1-Scores have been achieved over the trained model trained (using multi-modal COVID-19 data) in the CFL setup on X-ray and Ultrasound datasets, respectively. We also discussed the associated challenges, technologies, and techniques available for deploying ML at the edge in such privacy and delay-sensitive applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ojcs.2022.3206407

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 73 · Cited by 345

Authors
Qayyum, A., Ahmad, K., Ahsan, M. A., Al-Fuqaha, A., & Qadir, J.
Affiliations
  • Information Technology University (PK)
  • Munster Technological University (IE)
  • Information and Computing Technology Division, College of Science and Engineering (CSE), Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar
  • Qatar University (QA)
Venue
IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society
Published
2022
Volume
3
Pages
172-184
ISSN
2644-1268 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3122794187
Cited by
345
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 13
FWCI
21.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • NPRP (13S-0206-200273)
  • Qatar National Research Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
federated learning, clustered federated learning, edge computing, COVID-19 diagnosis, X-ray images, ultrasound images, privacy-preserving machine learning, medical data processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review