Collaborative Federated Learning for Healthcare: Multi-Modal COVID-19 Diagnosis at the Edge
Open accessAbstract
Despite significant improvements over the last few years, cloud-based healthcare applications continue to suffer from poor adoption due to their limitations in meeting stringent security, privacy, and quality of service requirements (such as low latency). The edge computing trend, along with techniques for distributed machine learning such as federated learning, has gained popularity as a viable solution in such settings. In this paper, we leverage the capabilities of edge computing in medicine by evaluating the potential of intelligent processing of clinical data at the edge. We utilized the emerging concept of clustered federated learning (CFL) for an automatic COVID-19 diagnosis. We evaluate the performance of the proposed framework under different experimental setups on two benchmark datasets. Promising results are obtained on both datasets resulting in comparable results against the central baseline where the specialized models (i.e., each on a specific image modality) are trained with central data, and improvements of 16% and 11% in overall F1-Scores have been achieved over the trained model trained (using multi-modal COVID-19 data) in the CFL setup on X-ray and Ultrasound datasets, respectively. We also discussed the associated challenges, technologies, and techniques available for deploying ML at the edge in such privacy and delay-sensitive applications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Six out of 17 reviewed articles used chest X-ray images.
“According to our investigation, six articles [18], [23], [25], [27], [29], [32] have used chest X-ray images out of 17.”
From A systematic review on federated learning in medical image analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [25]
Seven reviewed papers [21], [24], [25], [27], [28], [31], [32] used data samples between 2,109 and 6,284.
“Next, within the 10,000 sample range, seven papers [21], [24], [25], [27], [28], [31] and [32] used data samples between 2,109 and 6,284 and this number is quite good.”
From A systematic review on federated learning in medical image analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [25]
[25] used X-ray and ultrasound images for their federated models.
“In [25], the authors used X-ray and ultrasound images for their federated models.”
From A systematic review on federated learning in medical image analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [25]
Only two reviewed articles were defined as VFL: [24] and [25].
“Only two articles we defined as VFL; [24] have taken three datasets, two X-ray and one CT image based.”
From A systematic review on federated learning in medical image analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [25]
The accuracy scores of [30], [25], and [24] were not clear, but they discussed accuracy between 90-95%.
“Score of [30], [25] and [24] is not clear, they discussed the accuracy between 90-95%.”
From A systematic review on federated learning in medical image analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [25]
Qayyum et al. [25] presented a vertical FL based multi-modal COVID-19 diagnosis approach with sufficient experimental details.
“A vertical FL based multi-modal COVID-”
From A systematic review on federated learning in medical image analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [25]
In Qayyum et al. [25], non-IID data is not considered.
“Non-IID data is not considered.”
From A systematic review on federated learning in medical image analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [25]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 73 · Cited by 345
- Authors
- Qayyum, A., Ahmad, K., Ahsan, M. A., Al-Fuqaha, A., & Qadir, J.
- Affiliations
- Information Technology University (PK)
- Munster Technological University (IE)
- Information and Computing Technology Division, College of Science and Engineering (CSE), Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar
- Qatar University (QA)
- Venue
- IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 3
- Pages
- 172-184
- ISSN
- 2644-1268 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3122794187
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 65 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 13
- FWCI
- 21.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- NPRP (13S-0206-200273)
- Qatar National Research Fund
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Keywords
- federated learning, clustered federated learning, edge computing, COVID-19 diagnosis, X-ray images, ultrasound images, privacy-preserving machine learning, medical data processing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review