The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
A Review of Current-Limiting Control of Grid-Forming Inverters Under Symmetrical Disturbances
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Grid-forming (GFM) inverters are recognized as a viable solution to increase the penetration of renewable energy in bulk power systems. However, GFM inverters are physically different from synchronous generators (SGs) in terms of fault current level. To protect the GFM inverters and support the power grid under faults or severe disturbances, various current-limiting control methods are developed. In this paper, an overview of these methods is presented, which can be classified as direct, indirect, and hybrid ones. An overall control diagram of GFM inverters is developed to demonstrate the implementation of different current-limiting controls. The advantages and disadvantages of different methods are also illustrated. Finally, open issues of current-limiting control methods for GFM inverters, including control stability, fault recovery, and fault current injection, are summarized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 82 · Cited by 371
Research works printed but not linked: 74
- 10.1109/JESTPE.2019.2959271 · DOI
- 10.1109/OJIA.2021.3074028 · DOI
- 10.2172/1721727 · DOI
- 10.1109/MPE.2019.2933072 · DOI
- Lasseter, 2002, Microgrids, 1, 305
- 10.1109/JPROC.2017.2669342 · DOI
- 2019, Requirements for grid connection under requirements for generators (RFG), Regulations
- 10.1109/IEEESTD.2022.9762253 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2032231 · DOI
- 10.1109/JESTPE.2019.2931477 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TPEL.2013.2279162 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIA.2014.2345877 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3221209 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3135693 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIE.2021.3082055 · DOI
- 10.23919/IPEC-Himeji2022-ECCE53331.2022.9807235 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3122744 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/JESTPE.2019.2942491 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.rser.2012.05.043 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.rser.2007.06.004 · DOI
- 10.1109/SYSOSE.2007.4304253 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPEL.2004.836685 · DOI
- 10.1109/PESW.2002.985115 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPEL.2006.876844 · DOI
- 10.1109/ISGTEUROPE.2010.5638965 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIE.2006.882006 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRD.2012.2198497 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPEL.2020.3000522 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPEL.2019.2898165 · DOI
- 10.1109/JESTPE.2020.3013230 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRD.2012.2205713 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.seta.2017.02.004 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSG.2016.2517201 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSTE.2018.2887149 · DOI
- 10.1109/JESTPE.2017.2740424 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3107959 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIE.2012.2229680 · DOI
- 10.2172/1899301 · DOI
- 10.17775/CSEEJPES.2019.02660 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRD.2014.2330518 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPEL.2019.2937942 · DOI
- 10.1049/rpg2.12149 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106093 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIE.2018.2803765 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3173160 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIA.2011.2168592 · DOI
- 10.1049/iet-rpg.2017.0369 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIA.2021.3104269 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSG.2016.2594811 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.epsr.2021.107339 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPEL.2014.2382565 · DOI
- 10.1109/ECCE44975.2020.9236314 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIA.2021.3095025 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TIE.2008.918607 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106726 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRD.2018.2844082 · DOI
- 10.1109/JESTPE.2019.2959085 · DOI
- 10.1109/PESGM41954.2020.9281712 · DOI
- 10.1109/JESTPE.2021.3133806 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.766 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIE.2017.2733481 · DOI
- 10.1109/ALLERTON.2019.8919856 · DOI
- 10.1109/JESTPE.2019.2942943 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIE.2020.3007105 · DOI
- Schll, Instability phenomena in interconnected power systems caused by current limitation of grid-forming converters, 1
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3053142 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSG.2020.3030015 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSG.2017.2749259 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2521325 · DOI
- 10.23919/IPEC-Himeji2022-ECCE53331.2022.9807120 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPEL.2022.3208800 · DOI
- 10.1109/JESTPE.2020.2983726 · DOI
- 10.1109/ECCE47101.2021.9595742 · DOI
- 10.1109/TEC.2022.3208060 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, B., Liu, T., Zhao, F., Wu, H., & Wang, X.
- Affiliations
- Aalborg University (DK)
- KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
- Venue
- IEEE Open Journal of Power Electronics
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 3
- Pages
- 955-969
- ISSN
- 2644-1314 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4312939821
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 82
- Citations by year
- 2026: 92 · 2025: 149 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 36
- FWCI
- 28.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Open Journal of Power Electronics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- European Commission (HORIZON2020, 101031512)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Multilevel Inverters and Converters
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wind Turbine Control Systems
- Keywords
- grid-forming inverters, current limiting control, virtual impedance, voltage limiter, current limiter, fault current contribution, fault recovery, overcurrent protection, transient overvoltage, phase jumps, grid voltage drop, renewable energy integration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review