Group-in-a-Box Layout for Multi-faceted Analysis of Communities
Abstract
Communities in social networks emerge from interactions among individuals and can be analyzed through a combination of clustering and graph layout algorithms. These approaches result in 2D or 3D visualizations of clustered graphs, with groups of vertices representing individuals that form a community. However, in many instances the vertices have attributes that divide individuals into distinct categories such as gender, profession, geographic location, and similar. It is often important to investigate what categories of individuals comprise each community and vice-versa, how the community structures associate the individuals from the same category. Currently, there are no effective methods for analyzing both the community structure and the category-based partitions of social graphs. We propose Group-In-a-Box (GIB), a meta-layout for clustered graphs that enables multi-faceted analysis of networks. It uses the tree map space filling technique to display each graph cluster or category group within its own box, sized according to the number of vertices therein. GIB optimizes visualization of the network sub-graphs, providing a semantic substrate for category-based and cluster-based partitions of social graphs. We illustrate the application of GIB to multi-faceted analysis of real social networks and discuss desirable properties of GIB using synthetic datasets.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
El algoritmo Clauset-Newman-Moore busca grupos de vértices que estén conectados densamente entre ellos y que posean pocas conexiones con otros grupos.
“Dicho algoritmo busca grupos de vértices que estén conectados densamente entre ellos y que posean pocas conexiones con otros grupos (Clauset et al., 2004;Mendes Rodrigues et al., 2011).”
From “Vital testimonio confirm󔦔: Polarización de fuentes y redes en el Caso Catrillanca en Twitter (2021) · cites this paper as Mendes Rodrigues et al., 2011
En el campo del análisis de redes sociales no existe una metodología única y establecida, por lo que la mayor parte de las investigaciones, como esta, tienen un carácter exploratorio y experimental.
“En el campo del análisis de redes sociales no existe una metodología única y establecida, por lo que la mayor parte de las investigaciones, como esta, tienen un carácter exploratorio y experimental (Himelboim, et al., 2017;Mendes Rodrigues et al., 2011).”
From “Vital testimonio confirm󔦔: Polarización de fuentes y redes en el Caso Catrillanca en Twitter (2021) · cites this paper as Mendes Rodrigues et al., 2011
Cited by
Sorted by citations
“Vital testimonio confirm󔦔: Polarización de fuentes y redes en el Caso Catrillanca en Twitter
Santos, M. L. B., Jaramillo Castro, O., & Aguirre, D. (2021) · Cuadernos.info · doi:10.7764/cdi.49.27509 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“En el campo del análisis de redes sociales no existe una metodología única y establecida, por lo que la mayor parte de las investigaciones, como esta, tienen un carácter exploratorio y experimental (Himelboim, et al., 2017; Mendes Rodrigues et al., 2011).”
Background
- Authors
- Rodrigues, E. M., Milic-Frayling, N., Smith, M., Shneiderman, B., & Hansen, D.
- Affiliations
- Universidade do Porto (PT)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Venue
- 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2011-10
- Pages
- 354-361
- OpenAlex
- W2538898197
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.34
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Social Computing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Graph Theory and Algorithms
- Keywords
- graph layout, social network visualization, community structure, treemaps, space-filling curves, clustered graphs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review