The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection of magnet demagnetization in five-phase surface-mounted permanent magnet generators
Abstract
Multiphase generators are attractive particularly for medium and high power applications, because this technology allows reducing the current per phase and consequently the requirements of the inverter switches. The interest in multiphase machines is motivated also by their greater number of degrees of freedom compared to three-phase machines. This characteristic is often used to improve the machine performance, to increase the power density or for diagnostic purposes. In particular, the condition monitoring of the status of the magnets in permanent magnet synchronous generators is critical and is receiving an increasing attention. In this paper, the demagnetization of the rotor magnet trailing edges due to abnormal stator currents in five-phase surface-mounted permanent magnet synchronous generators is analyzed. A new non-invasive on-line detection method, which emphasizes the emf variation due to the demagnetization, exploiting the additional degrees of freedom of a multiphase generator, is presented. The proposed approach is validated by means of finite element analysis and numerical simulations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PI controller outputs have been used as diagnostic signals when decoupling signals are applied in control paths or when the control structure is extended with additional PI regulators to compensate for damage.
“-PI controller outputs in the case that the decoupling signals are applied in the control paths, e.g.[179] or when the control structure is extended with some additional PI regulators to compensate for the damage [180];”
From Fault Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Control of PMSM Drives–State of the Art and Future Challenges (2022) · cites this paper as [180]
Citations
Cites
Multiphase induction motor drives – a technology status review
LEVI, E., Bojoi, R. I., Profumo, F., Toliyat, H. A., & Williamson, S. (2007) · IET Electric Power Applications · doi:10.1049/iet-epa:20060342 · Cited by 1,620
Five-Phase Permanent-Magnet Motor Drives
Parsa, L., & Toliyat, H. A. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · doi:10.1109/tia.2004.841021 · Cited by 462
On advantages of multi-phase machines
Parsa, L. (2005) · Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON) · doi:10.1109/iecon.2005.1569139 · Cited by 298
Detecting Rotor Faults in Low Power Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines
le Roux, W., Harley, R. G., & Habetler, T. G. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2006.886620 · Cited by 274
Sensorless Direct Torque Control of Five-Phase Interior Permanent-Magnet Motor Drives
Parsa, L., & Toliyat, H. A. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · doi:10.1109/tia.2007.900444 · Cited by 189
Rajagopalan, S., Roux, W. L., Habetler, T. G., & Harley, R. G. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2007.904183 · Cited by 164
Magnets faults characterization for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors
Casadei, D., Filippetti, F., Rossi, C., & Stefani, A. (2009) · IEEE International Symposium on Diagnostics for Electrical Machines, Power Electronics and Drives (SDEMPED) · doi:10.1109/demped.2009.5292770 · Cited by 75
Self-citationSix-phase PMSG wind energy conversion system based on medium-voltage multilevel converter
Duran, M. J., Kouro, S., Wu, B., et al. (2011) · European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications · Cited by 72
García, J. R., Romeral, L., Ortega, J. A., & Urresty, J.-C. (2008) · IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE) · doi:10.1109/isie.2008.4677217 · Cited by 61
Field Weakening Operation of High Torque Density Five-Phase Permanent Magnet Motor Drives
Parsa, L., Kim, N. H., & Toliyat, H. A. (2005) · doi:10.1109/iemdc.2005.195920 · Cited by 55
Sensorless control of five-phase brushless DC motors
Olivieri, C., Fabri, G., & Tursini, M. (2010) · IEEE International Symposium on Sensorless Control for Electrical Drives (SLED) · doi:10.1109/sled.2010.5542805 · Cited by 20
Five-phase permanent magnet machines, advantages and applications
Mohammad, M. T., & Fletcher, J. (2010) · IET International Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives (PEMD) · doi:10.1049/cp.2010.0092 · Cited by 20
Behavior of a five-phase surface-mounted permanent magnet motor under magnet demagnetization
Casadei, D., Mengoni, M., Serra, G., et al. (2011) · doi:10.1109/demped.2011.6063634 · Cited by 18
Self-citationPredicting and preventing demagnetisation in permanent magnet motor drives
Haylock, J. A., Hoefer, U. M., & Jack, A. G. (2006) · IET International Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives (PEMD) · doi:10.1049/cp:20060154 · Cited by 15
Abdel-Khalik, A. S., & Ahmed, K. H. (2011) · IEEE International Electric Machines & Drives Conference (IEMDC) · doi:10.1109/iemdc.2011.5994758 · Cited by 11
Performance of three- and five-phase PM-based wind generators under rectifier diode failures
Fletcher, J. (2011) · Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society · doi:10.1109/iecon.2011.6119900 · Cited by 7
Franquelo, L. G. (2005) · Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers eBooks · Cited by 5
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fault Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Control of PMSM Drives–State of the Art and Future Challenges
Orlowska-Kowalska, T., Wolkiewicz, M., Pietrzak, P., Skowron, M., Ewert, P., Tarchala, G., Krzysztofiak, M., & Kowalski, C. T. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3180153 · Cited by 328
“[179] or when the control structure is extended with some additional PI regulators to compensate for the damage [180]; – voltage decoupling signals, not applied in the diagnostics so far.”
BackgroundChoi, S., Haque, M. S., Tarek, M. T. B., Mulpuri, V., Duan, Y., Das, S., Garg, V., Ionel, D. M., Masrur, M. A., Mirafzal, B., et al. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification · doi:10.1109/tte.2018.2819627 · Cited by 192
Metadata
- Authors
- Casadei, D., Filippetti, F., Mengoni, M., Gritli, Y., Serra, G., Tani, A., & Zarri, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Bologna (IT)
- Venue
- 2012 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Power Electronics for Distributed Generation Systems (PEDG)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2012-06
- Pages
- 841-848
- OpenAlex
- W2024550125
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Symposium on Power Electronics for Distributed Generation Systems (PEDG) (publishedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Motor Design and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Sensorless Control of Electric Motors
- Keywords
- permanent magnet demagnetization, permanent magnet synchronous generator, multiphase generator, condition monitoring, non-invasive fault detection, online detection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
