Cited by 47Optimal Power Flow DistributionMicrogrid Control and OptimizationSmart Grid Energy Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Smart inverter impacts on california distribution feeders with increasing pv penetration: A case study

Open access
Pecenak, Zachary K., Kleissl, Jan, Disfani, Vahid R.·2017·2017 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting

Abstract

The impacts of high PV penetration on distribution feeders have been well documented within the last decade. To mitigate these impacts, interconnection standards have been amended to allow PV inverters to regulate voltage locally. However, there is a deficiency of literature discussing how these inverters will behave on real feeders under increasing PV penetration. In this paper, we simulate several deployment scenarios of these inverters on a real California distribution feeder. We show that minimum and maximum voltage, tap operations, and voltage variability are improved due to the inverters. Line losses were shown to increase at high PV penetrations as a side effect. Furthermore, we find inverter sizing was shown to be important as PV penetration increased. Finally we show that increasing the number of inverters and removing the deadband from the Volt/VAr control curve improves the effectiveness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/pesgm.2017.8274538

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1016/j.solener.2016.03.019 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/PESGM.2015.7286560 · DOI
  3. seal, 2013, Common Functions for Smart Inverters Version 3
  4. 10.1109/PSC.2015.7101709 · DOI
  5. 0, Generating facility interconnections, California Electric Rule 21
  6. lave, 2015, Characterizing local high-frequency solar variability and its impact to distribution studies, Solar Energy, 118, 327, 10.1016/j.solener.2015.05.028 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/PVSC.2013.6745125 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/PSCE.2011.5772598 · DOI
  9. standard, 0, C84. 1-1982, American National Standard Voltage Ratings for Electric Power Systems and Equipment (60Hz)
  10. 10.1109/PESGM.2015.7286523 · DOI
  11. 10.1063/1.4808264 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 47

Metadata

Authors
Pecenak, Z. K., Kleissl, J., & Disfani, V. R.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
2017 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-07
Pages
1-5
ISSN
1932-5517 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2594033903
Cited by
47
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
10.45
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
Keywords
smart inverters, photovoltaic penetration, distribution feeders, volt/var control, dead band, line losses, inverter sizing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review