Stochastic Approach for Increasing the PV Hosting Capacity of a Low-Voltage Distribution Network
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, the emerging fear of an energy crisis in central Europe has caused an increased demand for distributed energy resources (DER), especially small photovoltaic rooftop installations up to 10 kWp. From a technical point of view, distributed PV in low-voltage networks is associated with the risk of power quality violation, overvoltage, voltage unbalance, harmonics, and violation of the thermal limit of phase conductors, neutral conductors, and transformers. Distribution system operators (DSO) are currently in a position to determine the amount of installed PV power for which reliable and safe network operation is ensured, also known as the photovoltaic hosting capacity (PVHC). The presented study describes a stochastic methodology for PVHC estimation and uses it to analyze a typical LV rural network in the Slovak Republic. Detailed and precise calculations are performed on the 4-wire LV model with accurate results. In this study, we, thus, profoundly analyze the problems with voltage violation, unbalanced voltage energy losses, and the thermal loading effect of increasing PV penetration. The results show that overvoltage events are the main factor limiting the PVHC in LV systems. This conclusion is in accordance with the experience of the DSO in the Slovak and Czech Republic. Subsequently, the study focuses on the possibilities of increasing PVHC using those tools typically available for DSO, such as changes in PV inverter power factors and no-load tap changer transformers. The results are compared with those derived from similar analyses, but we ultimately find that the proposed solution is problematic due to the high variability of approaches and boundary conditions. In conclusion, the paper discusses the issue of the acceptable risk of overvoltage violation in the context of PVHC and lowering losses in LV networks.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This paper develops a stochastic PV hosting capacity (PVHC) methodology for a real rural Slovak low-voltage 4-wire network and finds overvoltage is the limiting factor. It estimates base PVHC at 13.6% (79.9 kW) under 1% overvoltage risk, rising to 21.4% with PV power factor 0.95 or 31.5% with a −2.5% DETC tap.
Key findings
- Overvoltage was the main PVHC limitation. In the basic scenario V0, PVHC with 1% overvoltage tolerance was 13.6%, equal to 79.9 kW of small PV systems, and implementing this PV reduced line and transformer losses by 8.2% on average. Thermal limits and other quantities did not reach their limits; voltage-unbalance violation probability was below 0.1%.
- Absorbing reactive power increased PVHC: PF 0.95 gave 21.4% PVHC (127.7 kW, +57.35% over V0), PF 0.9 gave 26.4% (155 kW), PF 0.85 gave 33.3% (195.7 kW), and PF 0.8 gave 43.2% (253.4 kW, +217.65%). At DPI 0.3, losses decreased by 9.04% on average for PF 0.95 versus 15.6% in V0, while PF 0.80 increased losses by 1.9% on average.
- Changing the DETC tap from −5% to −2.5% increased PVHC to 31.5% (185.1 kW, +131.62% over V0) and reduced losses by 15.5% on average. Tap 0% gave PVHC 0 due to undervoltages below 0.85 Un. With a 5% overvoltage tolerance, PVHC values were higher, e.g., 24.4% for PF 1 and 50.6% for tap −2.5%.
- Increasing DPI did not significantly influence voltage unbalance αVUF; the probability of limit violation was below 0.1%, and increasing DPI even lowered αVUF due to random single-phase PV placement.
Methods
- Stochastic PVHC model: probabilistic power flow for increasing DER penetration index (DPI), defined as the energy ratio of PV production to PoC consumption, varied from 0 to 0.5 in steps of 0.1. Each DPI used multiple model variations generated by Monte Carlo for PV position, size, type, and phase; calculations used OpenDSS with a COM interface and Python, with steady-state time-series calculations for one year at 1-h steps.
- Case study: real rural LV 0.4 kV Slovak network, 4-wire, with 139 PoC in eight tariff categories, 163 overhead lines plus two cable lines, and a 22/0.4 kV 250 kVA DETC transformer with ±5% tap regulation in 2.5% steps and default tap −5%. Loads had yearly shapes, Pmax split among phases at 2:3:5, and random lagging PF 0.9–1; PV systems ranged from 0.2 to 10 kW per PoC, with meteorological measurements, maximum measured irradiation 906 W/m², and calculated yearly production of 1080 kWh per 1 kWp.
- PVHC was calculated by comparing cumulative distribution functions of voltage violation from probabilistic power flow against EN-50160-based limits: max phase-neutral voltage 253 V with 1% overvoltage probability, min −207 V with 5% probability, −195.5 V with 0% probability, and voltage unbalance 2% with 5% probability. Thermal limits were deterministic and not violated; harmonics were excluded.
Limitations
- The paper states that harmonics are not included due to lack of information; the methodology’s limitation is only the quality of the data on which the model is based; comparison with other studies is problematic due to high variability of approaches and boundary conditions; there is no consensus on acceptable risk; DSOs often do not control inverter PF and cannot order small customers to change PF; DETC tap cannot be changed while energized, so it remains static most of the year; further tap increase causes permanent undervoltages below 0.85 Un.
- The paper states future improvements: include all deterministic parameters as probabilities defined by mean and standard deviation for specific time steps, use a smaller time step such as 10 min, increase the number of model variations per probabilistic power flow, and implement parallel processing due to current computational ability and code effectiveness.
- Evident from the text: results are for one rural Slovak LV network and one year of hourly simulation; scenario V3 for BESS is listed but no results are reported; harmonics and supraharmonics are not modeled, and supraharmonic distortion limits have not yet been established.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
11 of 45 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Traditional deterministic models are not reliable for modeling systems with a high level of unpredictability.
“Traditional deterministic models are not reliable for modeling systems with a high level of unpredictability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Zain ul Abideen, M., Ellabban, O., and Al-Fagih, L. (2020). A Review of the Tools and Methods for Distribution Networks’ Hosting Capacity Calculation. Energies, 13. source
Section 3.1.1 (Constant Generation Method; page unavailable) says that this method is simplistic, can only estimate hosting capacity, and may underestimate it under worst-case assumptions. Section 3.2 (Stochastic Method; page unavailable) explains that stochastic techniques account for unknown variables in DER integration. These passages support limitations of one deterministic approach in distribution-network analysis, but not the broader assertion that traditional deterministic models are unreliable for all highly unpredictable systems. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The probability limitations chosen for analysis are significantly more conservative than the commonly used limit.
“The probability limitations chosen for analysis are significantly more conservative than the commonly used limit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 4 sources checked- cites [41] Klonari, V., Toubeau, J.F., Lobry, J., and Vallee, F. (2022, January 27–29). Photovoltaic Integration in Smart City Power Distribution— A Probabilistic Photovoltaic Hosting Capacity Assessment based on Smart Metering Data. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems-SMARTGREENS, Rome, Italy.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [42] Koirala, 2022, Hosting capacity of photovoltaic systems in low voltage distribution systems: A benchmark of deterministic and stochastic approaches, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. source
- cites [60] Dubey, 2017, On Estimation and Sensitivity Analysis of Distribution Circuit’s Photovoltaic Hosting Capacity, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. source
- cites [61] Navarro, A., Ochoa, L.F., and Randles, D. (2013, January 21–25). Monte Carlo-based assessment of PV impacts on real UK low voltage networks. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canada. source
Section C (Impact Assessment; page not provided) describes the EN50160 voltage criterion, including its 95% requirement, and Section IV reports probabilities of voltage problems. Neither section says that the probability limits chosen for the analysis are more conservative than a commonly used limit. Searches for conservative probability thresholds and a comparison with the 95% criterion found no such statement in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Stochastic approaches combining probabilistic definitions of unpredictable parameters and the Monte Carlo method on unknown parameters must be applied to problems with a high level of unpredictability.
“Zain et al. have shown that stochastic approaches combining the probabilistic definitions of unpredictable parameters and the Monte Carlo method on unknown parameters must be applied to these problems [26].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Zain ul Abideen, M., Ellabban, O., and Al-Fagih, L. (2020). A Review of the Tools and Methods for Distribution Networks’ Hosting Capacity Calculation. Energies, 13. source
Section 3.2, “Stochastic Method” (page not provided), describes using probabilistic power flow to account for unknown variables in distribution-network hosting-capacity calculations and identifies Monte Carlo simulation as the most common way to generate random scenarios. It says using stochastic techniques is reasonable, not that combining them with Monte Carlo is mandatory for all highly unpredictable problems; it also lists other methods. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
In all examined studies, the permissible violation probability was 5% or more.
“In the criteria of all examined studies, the permissible violation probability was 5% or more [41,42,60,61].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 4 sources checked- cites [41] Klonari, V., Toubeau, J.F., Lobry, J., and Vallee, F. (2022, January 27–29). Photovoltaic Integration in Smart City Power Distribution— A Probabilistic Photovoltaic Hosting Capacity Assessment based on Smart Metering Data. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems-SMARTGREENS, Rome, Italy.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [42] Koirala, 2022, Hosting capacity of photovoltaic systems in low voltage distribution systems: A benchmark of deterministic and stochastic approaches, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. source
- cites [60] Dubey, 2017, On Estimation and Sensitivity Analysis of Distribution Circuit’s Photovoltaic Hosting Capacity, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. source
- cites [61] Navarro, A., Ochoa, L.F., and Randles, D. (2013, January 21–25). Monte Carlo-based assessment of PV impacts on real UK low voltage networks. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canada. source
The Impact Assessment section states that EN50160 requires voltage to remain within 0.9–1.1 p.u. for at least 95% of weekly measurements, allowing up to 5% outside that range. That is a tolerance for measurements over time, not an explicit permissible probability of violations across Monte Carlo simulations; the section also specifies limits that must never be exceeded. This paper cannot establish the criterion used by the other cited studies. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingreasoning
In all cases, increasing PV penetration does not significantly influence voltage unbalance α VUF in the analyzed system.
“In all cases, increasing PV penetration does not significantly influence voltage to unbalance α VUF in the analyzed system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Our results, for 5% tolerance, allow connecting 1.2 kWp per PoC on average.
“Our results, for 5% tolerance, allow connecting 1.2 kWp per PoC on average.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All other quantities did not reach their limits.
“All other quantities did not reach their limits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The main problem in the analyzed network is overvoltage.
“It was confirmed that the main problem in the analyzed network is overvoltage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The resulting PVHC is highly dependent on permissible power quality limit violations.
“It is shown that the resulting PVHC is highly dependent on permissible power quality limit violations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Further tap increase will cause permanent undervoltages lower than 0.85 U n.
“Further tap increase will cause permanent undervoltages lower than 0.85 U n , and this is not allowed by DSO.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The downside of the tap change solution is an increase in undervoltages, mostly at the end of the feeders.
“The downside of this solution is an increase in undervoltages, mostly at the end of the feeders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For PF 0.9, PVHC is 26.4%.
“| 0.9 | 26.4 | 155 | 94.12 | overvoltage |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The calculated PVHC values are significantly different if a permissible violation probability of only 5% is used.
“As can be seen from the results of the comparison, Table 4, the calculated PVHC values are significantly different if a permissible violation probability of only 5% is used.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Although there has been a significant increase in current, the values are still below the maximum current carrying capacity of the lines.
“Although there has been a significant increase in current, the values are still below the maximum current carrying capacity of the lines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Undervoltages below 0.85 U n occurred for tap 0% even without any PV integration.
“Undervoltages below 0.85 U n occurred for tap 0% even without any PV integration, Figure 14.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
An average decrease of 15.6% in losses was calculated for DPI 0.3.
“An average decrease of 15.6% in losses was calculated for DPI 0.3.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
If PV represents up to 30% of consumed energy, a positive effect in lowering power losses is observed.
“If PV represents up to 30% of consumed energy, a positive effect in lowering power losses is observed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Implementing this size of distributed PV will reduce losses (lines and TR) by 8.2% on average.
“Implementing this size of distributed PV will reduce losses (lines and TR) by 8.2% on average.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Changing a single tap from -5% to -2.5% will increase PVHC to 31.5%.
“In our study, we estimated that changing a single tap from -5% to -2.5% will increase PVHC to 31.5% and reduce losses (lines and TR) by 15.5% on average.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
In the case with no PV in the system, all values are within the voltage limit range.
“In the case with no PV in the system, all values are within the voltage limit range.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
In the analyzed system, the only limitations are voltage violations.
“To summarize, in our study, the only limitations of the analyzed system are voltage violations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
As a result of PF 0.95, losses would be reduced by approximately 10% on average.
“As a result, losses would be reduced by approximately 10% on average.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The calculated yearly production from 1 kWp of installed PV is 1080 kWh.
“The calculated yearly production from 1 kWp of installed PV is 1080 kWh.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Due to the randomness of single-phase PV placement in the system, increasing the distributed energy resources penetration index resulted in a lower α VUF.
“Due to the randomness of single-phase PV placement in the system, increasing the distributed energy resources penetration index resulted in a lower α VUF .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Implementing a mandatory condition for the PF of PV to be 0.95 lagging (absorbing reactive power) would increase PVHC up to 21.4%.
“This would increase PVHC up to 21.4%.”
- Also stated in: § 6. Conclusions · plain
“| 0.95 | 21.4 | 127.7 | 57.35 | overvoltage |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 6. Conclusions · plain
- Findingown data
The probability of these undervoltages is well below 0.1%.
“However, their probability is well below 0.1%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Increasing DPI does not cause undervoltages.
“Increasing DPI does not cause undervoltages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Increasing DPI does not significantly influence voltage unbalance α VUF in scenario V0.
“Increasing DPI does not significantly influence α VUF .This is due to the model's equal distribution of single-phase PV systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The probability of limit violation was below 0.1% for all cases and models.
“The probability of limit violation was below 0.1% for all cases and models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For PF 0.8, PVHC is 43.2%.
“| 0.8 | 43.2 | 253.4 | 217.65 | overvoltage |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Changing a single tap from -5% to -2.5% will reduce losses (lines and TR) by 15.5% on average.
“In our study, we estimated that changing a single tap from -5% to -2.5% will increase PVHC to 31.5% and reduce losses (lines and TR) by 15.5% on average.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For PF 0.85, PVHC is 33.3%.
“| 0.85 | 33.3 | 195.7 | 144.85 | overvoltage |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The PVHC in the basic model, with conservative limitations of 1% overvoltage tolerance, was estimated to be 13.6%.
“The PVHC in the basic model, with conservative limitations of 1% overvoltage tolerance, was estimated to be 13.6%.”
- Also stated in: § 6. Conclusions · plain
“PVHC defined by 1% probability of overvoltage is 13.6%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 6. Conclusions · plain
- Premisecitation
The deterministic analysis is valid only for the worst-case situation regardless of the probability of its occurrence.
“The deterministic analysis is valid only for the worst-case situation regardless of the probability of its occurrence [42].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] Koirala, 2022, Hosting capacity of photovoltaic systems in low voltage distribution systems: A benchmark of deterministic and stochastic approaches, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. source
- Interpretationreasoning
Using tap -2.5% is the only possibility for increasing PVHC to 31.5%.
“This leaves only the possibility of using tap -2.5% for increasing PVHC to 31.5%,Table 3.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Total COP between 60 and 100 VR is less than 0.1%.
“Total COP between 60 and 100 VR is less than 0.1%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Overvoltage events are the main factor limiting the PVHC in LV systems.
“The results show that overvoltage events are the main factor limiting the PVHC in LV systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
A change in the tap position of 22/04 TR is the simplest solution to increase the PVHC of the network.
“It was shown that a change in the tap position of 22/04 TR is the simplest solution to increase the PVHC of the network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The COP calculated for DPI 0.5 is stable (absolute change between interactions was less than 0.1%) for VR larger than 60.
“The COP calculated for DPI 0.5 is stable (absolute change between interactions was less than 0.1%) for VR larger than 60.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
DSO can allow the installation of 79.9 kW of small PV systems (maximum size of 10 kW for a single installation).
“This means that DSO can allow the installation of 79.9 kW of small PV systems (maximum size of 10 kW for a single installation).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A 2019 stochastic study on an IEEE 123-bus system with rooftop PV calculated 16.48% PVHC with PV inverter PF 1 and 5% tolerance for overvoltage.
“A stochastic study in 2019 [68] performed on an IEEE 123-bus system with rooftop PV installations with a calculation of 16.48% PVHC with PV inverter PF 1 and 5% tolerance for overvoltage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [68] Atmaja, W.Y., Lesnanto, M.P., and Pramono, E.Y. (2019, January 12–14). Hosting Capacity Improvement Using Reactive Power Control Strategy of Rooftop PV Inverters. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 7th International Conference on Smart Energy Grid Engineering (SEGE), Oshawa, ON, Canada. source
- Premisecitation
PVHC can vary drastically from almost 0% up to several hundred.
“The PVHC can vary drastically from almost 0% up to several hundred, e.g., 30% PVHC was calculated for a typical United Kingdom urban medium voltage distribution network in [57] and 100% PVHC for an MV network in the United States (only 2.5 kW PV per PoC was considered) [63].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
In stochastic studies, voltage unbalance has an acceptable violation probability, typically 5%.
“In the case of stochastic studies, voltage unbalance has an acceptable violation probability, typically 5% [41,42].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [41] Klonari, V., Toubeau, J.F., Lobry, J., and Vallee, F. (2022, January 27–29). Photovoltaic Integration in Smart City Power Distribution— A Probabilistic Photovoltaic Hosting Capacity Assessment based on Smart Metering Data. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems-SMARTGREENS, Rome, Italy.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [42] Koirala, 2022, Hosting capacity of photovoltaic systems in low voltage distribution systems: A benchmark of deterministic and stochastic approaches, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. source
- Study design and conductown data
The distribution of P max 3p among phases at a ratio of 2:3:5 was determined from voltage unbalance measurements at PoC and transformer buses provided by DSO.
“This distribution was determined from the results of voltage unbalance measurements at PoC and transformer buses provided by DSO.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The presented model is based on a real rural LV network (230 V) in the Slovak Republic.
“The presented model is based on a real rural LV network (230 V) in the Slovak Republic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The load shape curves are the result of IMS analyses of over 1000 individual PoC load curves.
“The load shape curves are the result of IMS analyses of over 1000 individual PoC load curves.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Ampacity is the second major factor limiting PVHC.
“Overall, it is estimated that ampacity is the second major factor limiting PVHC [31].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Fatima, S., Püvi, V., and Lehtonen, M. (2020). Review on the PV Hosting Capacity in Distribution Networks. Energies, 13. source
- Interpretationcitation
The estimated PVHC values vary dramatically.
“As can be seen from these examples, the estimated PVHC values vary dramatically.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Tap control of MV/LV transformers can increase PVHC.
“Another possible solution identified from the analysis to increase PVHC is tap control of MV/LV transformers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Meteorological data are from real measurements at the network location.
“Meteorological data are from real measurements at the network location, Figure 6.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
An additional increase in PV systems would violate the overvoltage conditions.
“An additional increase in PV systems would violate the overvoltage conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Three main factors determine the limits of the PVHC: power quality standards, thermal limits of conductors and TR, and element fault current.
“Three main factors determine the limits of the PVHC [36]:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Martin, W., Stauffer, Y., Ballif, C., Hutter, A., and Alet, P.J. (2018, January 21–25). Automated Quantification of PV Hosting Capacity In Distribution Networks Under User-Defined Control and Optimisation Procedures. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT-Europe), Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. source
- Interpretationreasoning
The proposed solution is problematic due to the high variability of approaches and boundary conditions.
“The results are compared with those derived from similar analyses, but we ultimately find that the proposed solution is problematic due to the high variability of approaches and boundary conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In stochastic studies, the voltage limit has an acceptable violation probability of typically 5%.
“In the case of stochastic studies, such as this one, the voltage limit has an acceptable violation probability of typically 5% [41,42].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [41] Klonari, V., Toubeau, J.F., Lobry, J., and Vallee, F. (2022, January 27–29). Photovoltaic Integration in Smart City Power Distribution— A Probabilistic Photovoltaic Hosting Capacity Assessment based on Smart Metering Data. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems-SMARTGREENS, Rome, Italy.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [42] Koirala, 2022, Hosting capacity of photovoltaic systems in low voltage distribution systems: A benchmark of deterministic and stochastic approaches, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. source
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 27
- May combine two claims. 20
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPVHC is extremely variable and depends not only on the aforementioned factors but also on the definitions and limiting factors.
“These extensive reviews concluded that PVHC is extremely variable and depends not only on the aforementioned factors but also on the definitions and limiting factors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [31] Fatima, S., Püvi, V., and Lehtonen, M. (2020). Review on the PV Hosting Capacity in Distribution Networks. Energies, 13. source
- cites [42] Koirala, 2022, Hosting capacity of photovoltaic systems in low voltage distribution systems: A benchmark of deterministic and stochastic approaches, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. source
- cites [62] Fatima, S., Püvi, V., Arshad, A., Pourakbari-Kasmaei, M., and Lehtonen, M. (2021). Comparison of Economical and Technical Photovoltaic Hosting Capacity Limits in Distribution Networks. Energies, 14. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationImprovement of the PVHC has a regional character and cannot be solved with a set of universal precautions; a detailed simulation should be carried out for each case.
“Improvement of the PHVC has always had a regional character and, therefore, cannot be solved with a set of universal precautions.Instead, a detailed simulation should be carried out for each case [50,51].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [50] Hashemi, 2017, Methods and strategies for overvoltage prevention in low voltage distribution systems with PV, IET Renew. Power Gener. source
The indexed Abstract discusses methods for increasing PV hosting capacity, but does not say that improvements are region-specific, that universal precautions cannot work, or that each case requires detailed simulation. Searches for those terms and for case-specific network analysis found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [51] Zhang, D., Jiang, S., Liu, J., Wang, L., Chen, Y., Xiao, Y., Jiao, S., Xie, Y., Zhang, Y., and Li, M. (2022). Stochastic Optimization Operation of the Integrated Energy System Based on a Novel Scenario Generation Method. Processes, 10. source
Section 4.3 describes simulations of stochastic operation in an integrated energy microgrid, and Section 4 identifies the particular microgrid studied. Neither passage addresses whether improving photovoltaic hosting capacity is region-specific, whether universal precautions are inadequate, or whether every case requires detailed simulation. Searches for hosting capacity and region-specific simulation found no passage making those points. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA 2016 study on an LV network in Denmark estimated 40% PVHC.
“A study in 2016 [67] performed on an LV network in Denmark with estimation of 40% PVHC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [67] Hu, 2016, Coordinated voltage control of a decoupled three-phase on-load tap changer transformer and photovoltaic inverters for managing unbalanced networks, Electr. Power Syst. Res. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationReactive power control by PV is a cost-effective solution, but it has limited potential for increasing the PVHC.
“Reactive power control by PV is a cost-effective solution, but it has limited potential for increasing the PVHC [53,54].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [53] Pecenak, Z.K., Kleissl, J., and Disfani, V.R. (2017, January 16–20). Smart inverter impacts on california distribution feeders with increasing pv penetration: A case study. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting, Chicago, IL, USA. source
The Maximum Voltage section reports that Volt/VAr control mitigated overvoltage at 150% PV penetration on the studied feeder, but violations remained at higher penetration because the inverters lacked sufficient reactive-power capacity. This supports a limit on increasing hosting capacity in that setting. The paper does not establish that reactive-power control is cost-effective; its Introduction instead notes the high cost of retrofitting existing systems. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [54] Dvoracek, J., Klusacek, J., Drapela, J., and Topolánek, D. (2022, January 8–10). Dispatch Reactive Power Sharing Concept for Power Generating Plants in Medium Voltage Distribution Systems. Proceedings of the 2022 22nd International Scientific Conference on Electric Power Engineering (EPE), Kouty nad Desnou, Czech Republic. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIncreasing PV in LV networks does not always lead to increased conductor currents and TR loading; if the PoC consumes most of the generated power, line and transformer losses decrease.
“Increasing PV in LV networks does not always lead to increased conductor currents and TR loading.If the PoC is capable of consuming most of the generated power, then the opposite is true, and line and transformer losses decrease [30,47].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [30] Ismael, 2019, State-of-the-art of hosting capacity in modern power systems with distributed generation, Renew. Energy source
Section 3.2, “Overloading and power loss problems” (page unavailable), says DG connected close to the load can reduce feeder losses and the loading of feeding transformers. It supports the claim that more local generation need not increase loading, but does not specifically establish that transformer losses decrease when the point of connection consumes most of the PV output. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [47] Bendík, J., Cenký, M., Eleschová, Z., Beláň, A., Cintula, B., and Janiga, P. (2022, January 8–10). Stochastic Concept for Modeling Distributed Energy Resources in Power Systems. Proceedings of the 2022 22nd International Scientific Conference on Electric Power Engineering (EPE), Kouty nad Desnou, Czech Republic. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCentralized BESS are an efficient means to improve the PVHC in remote areas.
“At the same time, centralized BESS are an efficient means to improve the PVHC in remote areas [55].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] Gong, Q., Fang, J., Qiao, H., Liu, D., Tan, S., Zhang, H., and He, H. (2019). Optimal Allocation of Energy Storage System Considering Price-Based Demand Response and Dynamic Characteristics of VRB in Wind-PV-ES Hybrid Microgrid. Processes, 7. source
The Introduction says energy storage can improve clean-energy consumption, and the Abstract describes a BESS configuration intended to maximize absorption of photovoltaic and wind power. The paper does not establish improved photovoltaic hosting capacity specifically, nor does it assess centralized BESS in remote areas. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThermal limits of conductors and TR were considered in the analysis; their values are strictly deterministic and have no violation of line ratings, and the TR power limit (250 kVA) is permissible.
“Thermal limits of conductors and TR were also considered in the analysis.However, their values are strictly deterministic and have no violation of line ratings, Table 1, and the TR power limit (250 kVA) is permissible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn scenario V2, increasing DPI does not significantly influence α VUF, the probability of limit violation was below 0.1%, and currents in lines and TR loading did not reach their limits.
“Similarly, as in the V0 scenario, increasing the DPI does not significantly influence α VUF .The probability of limit violation was below 0.1%.Currents in lines and TR loading did not reach their limits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn scenario V1, the biggest problem is overvoltage; the lower voltage limit was not exceeded, increased DPI does not significantly influence α VUF, the probability of limit violation was below 0.1%, and currents and TR loading did not reach their limitations.
“From the results, we can state that the biggest problem in scenario V1 is overvoltage, Figure 11.The lower voltage limit was not exceeded in any calculation.Similarly, as in the V0 scenario, increased DPI does not significantly influence α VUF .The probability of limit violation was below 0.1%.The currents in lines and TR loading did not reach their limitations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn scenario V2, the limitations are overvoltage and undervoltage below 0.85 U n.
“From the results, we can state that the limitations in scenario V2 are overvoltage, Figure 13, and undervoltage below 0.85 U n , Table 3.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe 2% voltage unbalance limit was violated in every case in scenario V0, but the probability of limit violation was below 0.1%, and increasing DPI even lowers the probability.
“The 2% limit was violated in every case, but this is a result of load distribution.The probability of limit violation was below 0.1%, and increasing DPI even lowers the probability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe tap position had negligible influence on total power loss compared with V0; the reduction in power losses remains at 15.5% on average for DPI 0.3.
“The tap position had negligible influence on the total power loss compared with the V0 scenario.The reduction in power losses remains at 15.5% on average for DPI 0.3.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the particular network of scenario V0, the biggest problem is overvoltage; all other quantities did not reach their limits, and currents remained below the maximum current carrying capacity of the lines.
“From the results, we can state that the biggest problem in this particular network is overvoltage.All other quantities did not reach their limits.Although there has been a significant increase in currents, the values are still below the maximum current carrying capacity of the lines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIncreasing PV penetration causes significant reverse power flow, but the TR power limit was not violated even for high DPI.
“Increasing PV penetration causes significant reverse power flow.However, the TR power limit was not violated even for high DPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn scenario V1, PF helps to increase PVHC significantly, at the price of decreased PV efficiency and increased losses.
“In our study, PF helps to increase PVHC (Table 2), significantly.The price for this increase is a decrease in PV efficiency and increased losses, Figure 12.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn tap position -2.5%, there are significant undervoltages below 1.1 U n, but their probability was lower than 0.01%.
“In this tap position, there are significant undervoltages below 1.1 U n .However, their probability was lower than 0.01%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompared with V0 at DPI 0.3, power losses decreased on average by 9.04% for PF 0.95 instead of 15.6%; for PF 0.80, there was an even increase in losses, by 1.9% on average.
“Compared with V0 at DPI, 0.3 power losses decreased on average by 9.04% for PF 0.95 instead of 15.6%.For PF 0.80, there was an even increase in losses, by 1.9% on average.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIn most studies, the 5% probability of exceeding limit values is the benchmark and standard.
“In most of the studies, the 5% probability of exceeding the limit values is the benchmark and standard [42] from which we deviated in the first step.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] Koirala, 2022, Hosting capacity of photovoltaic systems in low voltage distribution systems: A benchmark of deterministic and stochastic approaches, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe model is built on real topology, grid parameters, PoC characteristics, and meteorological data measured at the location of the network and small source PV probability distribution characteristics provided by DSO.
“The model is built on real topology, grid parameters, PoC characteristics, and meteorological data measured at the location of the network and small source PV probability distribution characteristics provided by DSO.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningUsing the stochastic approach, PVHC limits can be expressed with probabilities of violation.
“Using the stochastic approach, PVHC limits can also be expressed with probabilities of violation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOvervoltages were the PVHC limitation identified in the 2010 rural European study.
“Overvoltages were also the PVHC limitation identified in this study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] Stetz, T., Yan, W., and Braun, M. (2010, January 6–10). Voltage control in distribution systems with high level PV-penetration. Proceedings of the 25th European PV Solar Energy Conference, Valencia, Spain.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe limit for voltage unbalance is 2% according to EN-50160:2010 and 3% for ANSI C84.1.
“The limit for voltage unbalance is 2% according to EN-50160:2010 [39], and 3% for ANSI C84.1 [40].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [39] (2010). Voltage Characteristics of Electricity Supplied by Public Electricity Networks. Standard No. EN 50160:2010.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [40] (2011). American National Standard for Electric Power Systems and Equipment—Voltage Ratings (60 Hertz). Standard No. ANSI C84.1-2011.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA 2007 study calculated 30% PVHC, with voltage limitation, in an LV of a United Kingdom network.
“A study in 2007 [57] in which 30% PVHC was calculated, with voltage limitation, in an LV of a United Kingdom network.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] Thomson, 2007, Impact of widespread photovoltaics generation on distribution systems, IET Renew. Power Gener. source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPower quality standards and thermal limits are crucial for LV networks.
“Hereafter, we focus only on power quality standards and thermal limits, which are crucial for LV networks [36].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Martin, W., Stauffer, Y., Ballif, C., Hutter, A., and Alet, P.J. (2018, January 21–25). Automated Quantification of PV Hosting Capacity In Distribution Networks Under User-Defined Control and Optimisation Procedures. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT-Europe), Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn the 2019 study, changing PF to 0.895 increased PVHC up to 32.3%.
“By changing PF to 0.895, the PVHC was increased up to 32.3%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [68] Atmaja, W.Y., Lesnanto, M.P., and Pramono, E.Y. (2019, January 12–14). Hosting Capacity Improvement Using Reactive Power Control Strategy of Rooftop PV Inverters. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 7th International Conference on Smart Energy Grid Engineering (SEGE), Oshawa, ON, Canada. source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe number of generated and calculated VR for each DPI is an essential calculation parameter; more VR analyzed means more grid configurations examined and more realistic results.
“The number of generated and calculated VR for each DPI is an essential calculation parameter.The more VR that have been analyzed, the larger the number of possible grid configurations examined and the more realistic the results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThis approach can be applied to any level of model detail.
“This approach can be applied to any level of model detail.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenFrom the point of view of the safety and functionality of the devices, overvoltage conditions are much riskier than undervoltage conditions.
“From the point of view of the safety and functionality of the devices, overvoltage conditions are much riskier than undervoltage conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn 48% of all networks, the PVHC is limited by voltage violations, mostly overvoltages due to reverse power flow.
“According to [31], the PVHC in 48% of all networks is limited by voltage violations, mostly overvoltages due to reverse power flow in the network.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Fatima, S., Püvi, V., and Lehtonen, M. (2020). Review on the PV Hosting Capacity in Distribution Networks. Energies, 13. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn all CDF calculations, the residual sum of squares (RSS) is below 0.002.
“In all CDF calculations, the residual sum of squares (RSS) is below 0.002.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Study design and conductreasoningA sufficient number of VR represents the stabilization of defined global network parameters, such as overvoltage probability in each incremental step.
“A sufficient number of VR represents the stabilization of defined global network parameters, such as overvoltage probability in each incremental step.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningComparing the results of other studies with ours is problematic due to the large variance in PVHC.
“Comparing the results of other studies with ours is problematic due to this large variance, which is due to the large number of variables that are often specific to individual studies, such as:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningLimitations due to harmonics are not included in this study due to the lack of information.
“Limitations due to harmonics are not included in this proposed study due to the lack of information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThere are very few studies with which we can compare our results.
“Because of this, there are very few studies with which we can compare our results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenThe limitation of the presented methodology is only the quality of the data on which the model is based.
“The limitation of the presented methodology is only the quality of the data on which the model is based.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA 2016 study on a rural system with rooftop PV calculated 13% PVHC, with overvoltages estimated as the limitation source.
“A study in 2016 [66] performed on a rural system with rooftop PV installations with a calculation of 13% PVHC, with overvoltages estimated as the limitation source.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [66] Heinrich, C., Fortenbacher, P., Fuchs, A., and Andersson, G. (2016, January 4–8). PV-integration strategies for low voltage networks. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON), Leuven, Belgium. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThis stochastic approach has been widely adopted in recent years by several research groups.
“This approach has been widely adopted in recent years by several research groups [15,24,[27][28][29].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15,24,[27][28][29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEN-50160:2010 sets the limit for voltage total harmonic distortion (THD) at 8%.
“EN-50160:2010 sets the limit for voltage total harmonic distortion (THD), defined by IEEE-519 [44], at 8%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [39] (2010). Voltage Characteristics of Electricity Supplied by Public Electricity Networks. Standard No. EN 50160:2010.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [44] (2014). IEEE Recommended Practice and Requirements for Harmonic Control in Electric Power Systems. Standard No. IEEE Std 519-2014.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA 2010 study on a rural European network calculated a maximum installed power of 3.5 kWp per PoC.
“A study in 2010 [65] performed on a rural European network, with a calculated maximum installed power of 3.5 kWp per PoC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] Stetz, T., Yan, W., and Braun, M. (2010, January 6–10). Voltage control in distribution systems with high level PV-penetration. Proceedings of the 25th European PV Solar Energy Conference, Valencia, Spain.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenStochastic studies with highly specific and realistic input values for particular regions, such as the typical Slovak Republic, are rare.
“We found that stochastic studies with highly specific and realistic input values for particular regions, such as the typical Slovak Republic, are rare.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn a 2020 study in a suburban area of Finland, 233.5% PVHC was estimated.
“In another study conducted in 2020 in a suburban area of Finland, 233.5% PVHC was estimated [64].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [64] Ferdowsi, 2020, Assessing distribution network sensitivity to voltage rise and flicker under high penetration of behind-the-meter solar, Renew. Energy source
The paper relies on this without support.
In the Slovak Republic, stochastic methods for PVHC remain in the background.
“In the region of the Slovak Republic, however, stochastic methods remain in the background.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The default tap position of -5% is typical in LV networks to avoid undervoltage at the end of long feeders.
“This is the typical tap position used in LV networks to avoid undervoltage at the end of long feeders.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is currently no consensus on the permissible risk of limit violation, and it is up to DSO to define it.
“There is currently no consensus on the permissible risk, and it is up to DSO to define it.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The tap of a DETC transformer cannot be changed if energized.
“The problem with DETC TR is that its tap cannot be changed if energized.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Voltage unbalance in the LV network increases with the extent of unequal load and generation distributed among phases.
“Voltage unbalance in the LV network increases with the extent of unequal load and generation distributed among phases.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Overvoltage conditions are much riskier than undervoltage conditions from the point of safety and functionality of devices.
“From the point of the safety and functionality of devices, overvoltage conditions are much riskier than undervoltage conditions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
DSO often does not have control over the PF inverters, and in the current legislative setting, it cannot order small customers to change the PF.
“It is also important to mention that DSO often does not have control over the PF inverters, and in the current legislative setting, it cannot even order small customers to change the PF.”
The paper relies on this without support.
DSO does not allow permanent undervoltages lower than 0.85 U n.
“Further tap increase will cause permanent undervoltages lower than 0.85 U n , and this is not allowed by DSO.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Undervoltages are described as below the overvoltage threshold
MinorThe paper identifies 1.1 times nominal voltage as its overvoltage threshold, but calls voltages below that threshold "undervoltages" with a probability below 0.01%. These are not the same limit or event.
“In this tap position, there are significant undervoltages below 1.1 U n .However, their probability was lower than 0.01%.”
“P(U L-neutral > 1.1U n ) ≤ 0.01”
Conclusion gives power factor as 0.95% rather than 0.95
MinorThe conclusion attributes a PVHC of 21.4% to a power factor of 0.95%, whereas Table 2 attributes that result to a power factor of 0.95. Those power-factor values differ by a factor of 100.
“the PF of PV to be 0.95% lagging (absorbing reactive power).This would increase PVHC up to 21.4%.”
“| 0.95 | 21.4 | 127.7 | 57.35 | overvoltage |”
Scenario V1 includes a power factor outside its stated range
MinorScenario V1 says the PV power factor varies only down to 0.85, yet its results include PF 0.80.
“PF of PV systems varies from 1 to 0.85 (absorbing reactive power);”
“For PF 0.80, there was an even increase in losses, by 1.9% on average.”
Cites
Distributed generation: a definition
Ackermann, T., Andersson, G., & Söder, L. (2001) · Electric Power Systems Research · doi:10.1016/s0378-7796(01)00101-8 · Cited by 2,508 · see citing works
Review of energy storage technologies for sustainable power networks
Akinyele, D., & Rayudu, R. K. (2014) · Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments · doi:10.1016/j.seta.2014.07.004 · Cited by 716 · see citing works
State-of-the-art of hosting capacity in modern power systems with distributed generation
Ismael, S. M., Abdel Aleem, S. H. E., Abdelaziz, A. Y., & Zobaa, A. F. (2019) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.008 · Cited by 599 · see citing works
Impact of high PV penetration on voltage profiles in residential neighborhoods
Tonkoski, R., Turcotte, D., & El-Fouly, T. H. M. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy · doi:10.1109/tste.2012.2191425 · Cited by 557 · see citing works
An Overview of Parameter and Cost for Battery Electric Vehicles
König, A., Nicoletti, L., Schröder, D., Wolff, S., Waclaw, A., & Lienkamp, M. (2021) · World Electric Vehicle Journal · doi:10.3390/wevj12010021 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Impact of widespread photovoltaics generation on distribution systems
Thomson, M., & Infield, D. G. (2007) · IET Renewable Power Generation · doi:10.1049/iet-rpg:20060009 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Stochastic analyses of electric vehicle charging impacts on distribution network
Leou, R.-C., Su, C.-L., & Lu, C.-N. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2013.2291556 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Hasan, K. N., Preece, R., & Milanović, J. V. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.027 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Methods and strategies for overvoltage prevention in low voltage distribution systems with PV
Hashemi, S., & Østergaard, J. (2017) · IET Renewable Power Generation · doi:10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0277 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
PV Penetration Limits in Low Voltage Networks and Voltage Variations
Aziz, T., & Ketjoy, N. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2747086 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Power Quality in Microgrids Including Supraharmonics: Issues, Standards, and Mitigations
Alkahtani, A. A., Alfalahi, S. T. Y., Athamneh, A. A., Al-Shetwi, A. Q., Mansor, M., Hannan, M. A., & Agelidis, V. G. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3008042 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
A Review of the Tools and Methods for Distribution Networks’ Hosting Capacity Calculation
Zain ul Abideen, M., Ellabban, O., & Al-Fagih, L. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en13112758 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
On Estimation and Sensitivity Analysis of Distribution Circuit’s Photovoltaic Hosting Capacity
Dubey, A., & Santoso, S. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2016.2622286 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Review on the PV Hosting Capacity in Distribution Networks
Fatima, S., Püvi, V., & Lehtonen, M. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en13184756 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., Ren, S., Dong, Z. Y., Xu, Y. H., Meng, K., & Zheng, Y. J. (2017) · IET Generation Transmission & Distribution · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.0508 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Koirala, A., Van Acker, T., D’hulst, R., & Van Hertem, D. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111899 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Definitions of Voltage Unbalance
(2001) · IEEE Power Engineering Review · doi:10.1109/mper.2001.4311362 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Monte Carlo-based assessment of PV impacts on real UK low voltage networks
Navarro, A., Ochoa, L. F., & Randles, D. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting · doi:10.1109/pesmg.2013.6672620 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
American National Standard Electric Power Systems and Equipment- Voltage Ratings (60 Hertz
galdona, J. (2000) · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Hu, J., Marinelli, M., Coppo, M., Zecchino, A., & Bindner, H. W. (2016) · Electric Power Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2015.10.025 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Pecenak, Z. K., Kleissl, J., & Disfani, V. R. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting · doi:10.1109/pesgm.2017.8274538 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Feldman, D. G., Wu, K. C. ‐., & Margolis, R. (2021) · doi:10.2172/1808491 · Cited by 43
Ruf, H. (2017) · Solar Energy · doi:10.1016/j.solener.2017.10.072 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Arshad, A., Püvi, V., & Lehtonen, M. (2018) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en11061467 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Polat, Ö., Eyüboğlu, O. H., & Gül, Ö. (2020) · Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s00202-020-01093-5 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Ferdowsi, F., Mehraeen, S., & Upton, G. B. (2020) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.124 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Zhang, D., Jiang, S., Liu, J., Wang, L., Chen, Y., Xiao, Y., Jiao, S., Xie, Y., Zhang, Y., & Li, M. (2022) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr10020330 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Comparison of Economical and Technical Photovoltaic Hosting Capacity Limits in Distribution Networks
Fatima, S., Püvi, V., Arshad, A., Pourakbari-Kasmaei, M., & Lehtonen, M. (2021) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en14092405 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Unlocking the Potential of Distributed Energy Resources
International Energy Agency (2022) · OECD eBooks · doi:10.1787/a2ed7a25-en · Cited by 24 · see citing works
PV-integration strategies for low voltage networks
Heinrich, C., Fortenbacher, P., Fuchs, A., & Andersson, G. (2016) · 2016 IEEE International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON) · doi:10.1109/energycon.2016.7514141 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Klonari, V., Toubeau, J., Lobry, J., et al. (2016) · International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems · doi:10.5220/0005792001660178 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Gong, Q., Fang, J., Qiao, H., Liu, D., Tan, S., Zhang, H., & He, H. (2019) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr7080483 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Grabner, M., Souvent, A., Suljanović, N., Košir, A., & Blažič, B. (2019) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en12214086 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Analysis of Prosumer Behavior in the Electrical Network
Medveď, D., Kolcun, M., Pavlík, M., et al. (2021) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en14248212 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Hosting Capacity Improvement Using Reactive Power Control Strategy of Rooftop PV Inverters
Atmaja, W. Y., Sarjiya, Lesnanto, M. P., & Pramono, E. Y. (2019) · 2019 IEEE 7th International Conference on Smart Energy Grid Engineering (SEGE) · doi:10.1109/sege.2019.8859888 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Enhancing PV Hosting Capacity Using Voltage Control and Employing Dynamic Line Rating
Karunarathne, E., Wijethunge, A., & Ekanayake, J. B. (2021) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15010134 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Moon, J. H., Gwon, H. N., Jo, G. R., et al. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en13174404 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
An investigation into the technical impacts of microgeneration on uk-type LV distribution networks
Kitworawut, P., Azuatalam, D. T., Unigwe, O., & Collin, A. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications · doi:10.1109/aupec.2016.7749321 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Aydın, M. S., Alnaser, S. W., & Althaher, S. Z. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15134836 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Impact of electric vehicles and demand management systems on electrical distribution networks
Oliinyk, M., Džmura, J., Kolcun, M., et al. (2021) · Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s00202-021-01327-0 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Supraharmonic emission from a three-phase PV system connected to the LV grid
Menti, A., Barkas, D. A., Kaminaris, S., et al. (2021) · Energy Reports · doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.07.100 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Spring 2025 Solar Industry Update [Slides]
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Feldman, D. N., Zuboy, J., et al. (2025) · doi:10.2172/2583540 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Improving PV Hosting Capacity of Distribution Grids Considering Dynamic Voltage Characteristic
Astero, P., & Söder, L. (2018) · Power Systems Computation Conference · doi:10.23919/pscc.2018.8442517 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Kumar, P., Nikolovski, S., Ali, I., et al. (2022) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr10081593 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Singh, N. K., Wanik, M. Z. C., Jabbar, A. A., et al. (2019) · IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe · doi:10.1109/isgteurope.2019.8905545 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Martin, W., Stauffer, Y., Ballif, C., Hutter, A., & Alet, P.-J. (2018) · 2018 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT-Europe) · doi:10.1109/isgteurope.2018.8571427 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Battery Storage and Charging Systems Power Control Supporting Voltage in Charging Mode
Vrana, M., Drápela, J., Topolánek, D., et al. (2020) · International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power · doi:10.1109/ichqp46026.2020.9177889 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Stochastic Concept for Modeling Distributed Energy Resources in Power Systems
Bendik, J., Cenky, M., Eleschova, Z., Belan, A., Cintula, B., & Janiga, P. (2022) · 2022 22nd International Scientific Conference on Electric Power Engineering (EPE) · doi:10.1109/epe54603.2022.9814093 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationPeppanen, J., Taylor, J., Fonseca, D. S., et al. (2021) · IET conference proceedings. · doi:10.1049/icp.2021.1481 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Alanazi, A. M. M., Alanazi, M., Abdelaziz, A. Y., et al. (2022) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr10112179 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Empirical analysis for Distributed Energy Resources' impact on future distribution network
Han, X., Sandels, C., Zhu, K., et al. (2012) · IEEE International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON) · doi:10.1109/energycon.2012.6348247 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
A stochastic approach for the integration of distributed energy resources
Ichoua, S. (2014) · IEEE International Technology Management Conference · doi:10.1109/itmc.2014.6918611 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Dvoracek, J., Klusacek, J., Drapela, J., & Topolanek, D. (2022) · 2022 22nd International Scientific Conference on Electric Power Engineering (EPE) · doi:10.1109/epe54603.2022.9814135 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Solar Industry Update (Fall 2022) [Slides]
Feldman, D. N., Dummit, K., Zuboy, J., et al. (2022) · doi:10.2172/1900508 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- IEA (2021). Global Energy Review 2021, IEA.
- Rylander, M., and Smith, J. (2012, January 28–30). Stochastic approach for distribution planning with distributed energy resources. Proceedings of the CIGRE Grid of the Future Symposium, Kansas City, MO, USA.
- Rylander, M., and Smith, J. (2012, January 13–15). Comprehensive Approach for Determining Distribution Network Hosting Capacity for Solar PV. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Integration of Solar Power Into Power Systems, Lisbon, Portugal.
- Stetz, T., Yan, W., and Braun, M. (2010, January 6–10). Voltage control in distribution systems with high level PV-penetration. Proceedings of the 25th European PV Solar Energy Conference, Valencia, Spain.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mousa, H. H. H., Mahmoud, K., & Lehtonen, M. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3359431 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
“Many articles studied the OLTC transformer as an efficient HC improvement technique for emerging grids in [311], [312], and [313].”
BackgroundBalogun, O. A., Sun, Y., & Gbadega, P. A. (2024) · e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering Electronics and Energy · doi:10.1016/j.prime.2024.100800 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Qammar, N., Arshad, A., Miller, R. J., Mahmoud, K., & Lehtonen, M. (2024) · Electric Power Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2023.109940 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Cenký, M., Bendík, J., Janiga, P., et al. (2024) · Smart Cities · doi:10.3390/smartcities7060153 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“This paper is part of a continuous research effort on this topic from previous authors’ publications such as [20–22].”
Self-citationEnhancing Photovoltaic Farm Capacity Estimation: A Comprehensive Analysis with a Novel Approach
Dolatabadi, S. H. H., Soleimani, A., Maghanaki, M., et al. (2024) · Energy Technology · doi:10.1002/ente.202301294 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Aljafari, B., Pamshetti, V. B., & Thanikanti, S. B. (2023) · International Journal of Green Energy · doi:10.1080/15435075.2023.2245024 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“In (Bendík et al. 2022), a comprehensive study on increased PV penetration was explored in terms of the concerns surrounding voltage violation as well as unbalanced voltage energy losses under open source distribution system simulator (OpenDSS).”
Mahairi, M. G., Mohamed, B., Domínguez, X., et al. (2025) · Sustainable Energy Grids and Networks · doi:10.1016/j.segan.2025.102026 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Huaman-Rivera, A., Agustin, I.-R., & Ricardo, C.-H. (2025) · Energy Reports · doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2025.06.034 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Dandea, V., & Grigoraş, G. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13106158 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Romero, J. G. Y., Home-Ortiz, J. M., Pinto, T. D. O., et al. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3603855 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“In [22], a stochastic method to maximize PVHC is proposed and tested on a real system in the Czech Republic using OpenDSS software.”
Impact of Prosumers’ Operation on Selected Parameters of Low-Voltage Distribution Network Operation
Benesz, M., & Moskwa, S. (2024) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en17081872 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Testing, Analysis and Diagnostics of Chosen Faults of Photovoltaic Systems
Perný, M., Šály, V., Packa, J., et al. (2024) · International Scientific Conference on Electric Power Engineering · doi:10.1109/epe61521.2024.10559522 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“In addition to analyzes of the well-known negative effects on the grid [5] (deterioration of the power factor, higher harmonics, overvoltages and other) it is very important to focus on the safe and reliable operation of the PV system as well as the reliability of energy supply from PV source.”
BackgroundChen, X., Ge, Y., Zhang, Y., et al. (2024) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr12040779 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Dandea, V., & Grigoraş, G. (2023) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202304.0020.v1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Modelling Photovoltaic Cells under Variable Conditions of Temperature and Solar Insolation Intensity
Pavlík, M., & Mamchur, D. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Modern Electrical and Energy System (MEES) · doi:10.1109/mees61502.2023.10402476 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Random Network Topology Generator for Advanced Testing of Smart Grid Applications
Höger, M., Baherník, M., Braciník, P., et al. (2023) · International Scientific Conference on Electric Power Engineering · doi:10.1109/epe58302.2023.10149297 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“An example of possible application is testing of algorithms for voltage or power factor control, optimization of loses in low voltage networks or methods for increasing of RES hosting capacity [9].”
MethodImpact of Road Tunnel Consumption on the Power Quality, Power Factor and Reactive Power Flow
Stanko, P., Reguľa, M., & Otčenášová, A. (2023) · Transportation research procedia · doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2023.11.221 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Pavlík, M., & Melnykov, V. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Modern Electrical and Energy System (MEES) · doi:10.1109/mees61502.2023.10402421 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“They can ionize atoms and molecules, leading to DNA damage and potential health risks such as cancer [1-3].”
BackgroundMitigation of Overvoltages in Low Voltage Network by Distributed Battery Energy Storage System
Bendík, J., Cenký, M., Eleschová, Ž., et al. (2023) · International Scientific Conference on Electric Power Engineering · doi:10.1109/epe58302.2023.10149309
“Other types of limits, and solutions for PVHC improvement, have been analyzed in previous studies [5].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationComparison of Photovoltaic System Performance under Different Conditions
Pavlík, M., & Kalinov, A. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Modern Electrical and Energy System (MEES) · doi:10.1109/mees61502.2023.10402398
Comparison of Vertical and Horizontal Shading of a Photovoltaic Panel
Pavlík, M., Zbojovský, J., Štefko, R., et al. (2023) · IEEE International Conference and Workshop Óbuda on Electrical and Power Engineering (CANDO-EPE) · doi:10.1109/cando-epe60507.2023.10417993
Tian, X., Lou, F., Zhao, Y., et al. (2025) · Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering · doi:10.1177/14727978251326521
Huang, T., Yu, H., Chen, T., et al. (2025) · Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering · doi:10.1177/14727978251361520
Eid, A. (2025) · International Journal of Emerging Electric Power Systems · doi:10.1515/ijeeps-2025-0258
“Arecentstudy[22]investigatedatypicalLVruralgrid in Slovakia using a stochastic approach to predicting PV-HC.”
Boundary Analysis of the Limit Penetration Rate for Large-Scale Distributed Photovoltaic Systems
Zhou, S., Jiang, R., & Dong, M. (2026) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-1110-4_14
Jing, J., Liang, G., Xu, F., Yan, H., Yu, R., & Hao, L. (2026) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr14172767
- Authors
- Bendík, J., Cenký, M., Cintula, B., Beláń, A., Eleschová, Ž., & Janiga, P.
- Affiliations
- Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava (SK)
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Ilkovičova 3, 81 219 Bratislava, Slovakia
- Corresponding author
- Bendík, Jozef
- Venue
- Processes
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-12-21
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9
- ISSN
- 2227-9717 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4313502099
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11
- FWCI
- 1.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Processes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Operational Program Integrated Infra-structure (313021W404)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power Quality and Harmonics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Thermal Analysis in Power Transmission
- Keywords
- photovoltaic hosting capacity, low-voltage distribution networks, stochastic modeling, overvoltage, voltage unbalance, power quality, photovoltaic penetration, energy loss, rural distribution networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review