Planning of electric vehicle charging infrastructure
Abstract
The Electric Vehicle (EV) has become the sustainable alternative to fossil fuel driven automobiles. As a result, a new type of load is being seen on power systems. Hence, provision of an EV charging infrastructure has become a new challenge for power system engineers worldwide. It has been identified that the voltage dependent nature of EV load may lead to voltage instabilities in the system. Furthermore, significant load integration into the distribution system may overload the system components, increase power system losses and may violate system constraints. Despite these factors EV consumers should be provided with convenient and reliable charging facilities. Hence, the identification of a charging infrastructure which satisfies requirements of both the EV customer and the power system is of primary importance. A particle swarm optimization (PSO) based approach is considered here for planning of EV charging infrastructure.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Uncontrolled charging of EV load has the potential to severely affect the normal operation of the grid.
“It is evident from the literature [59][60][61][62] that the uncontrolled charging of EV load has the potential to severely affect the normal operation of the grid.”
From Voltage Regulation in Rooftop PV-Rich Distribution Networks: A Review and Detailed Case Study (2026) · cites this paper as [62]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Voltage Regulation in Rooftop PV-Rich Distribution Networks: A Review and Detailed Case Study
Rahman, O., Elphick, S., & Robinson, D. A. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15051074 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dharmakeerthi, C. H., Mithulananthan, N., & Saha, T. K.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Venue
- 2013 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2013
- Pages
- 1-5
- ISSN
- 1932-5517 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2129591744
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.03
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
- Keywords
- electric vehicle charging infrastructure, charging station siting and sizing, particle swarm optimization, voltage instability, power system losses, power system planning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
