Geometrical and Statistical Properties of Systems of Linear Inequalities with Applications in Pattern Recognition
Abstract
This paper develops the separating capacities of families of nonlinear decision surfaces by a direct application of a theorem in classical combinatorial geometry. It is shown that a family of surfaces having d degrees of freedom has a natural separating capacity of 2d pattern vectors, thus extending and unifying results of Winder and others on the pattern-separating capacity of hyperplanes. Applying these ideas to the vertices of a binary n-cube yields bounds on the number of spherically, quadratically, and, in general, nonlinearly separable Boolean functions of n variables. It is shown that the set of all surfaces which separate a dichotomy of an infinite, random, separable set of pattern vectors can be characterized, on the average, by a subset of only 2d extreme pattern vectors. In addition, the problem of generalizing the classifications on a labeled set of pattern points to the classification of a new point is defined, and it is found that the probability of ambiguous generalization is large unless the number of training patterns exceeds the capacity of the set of separating surfaces.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Early theoretical works established that even simple network architectures can memorize a significant number of input-output mappings, with capacity often related to the number of network parameters and the input dimensionality.
“Early theoretical works established that even simple network architectures can memorize a significant number of inputoutput mappings, with capacity often related to the number of network parameters (e.g., weights and biases) and the input dimensionality Baum (1988), Cover (1965), and Huang (2003).”
From ATLAS: Learning to Optimally Memorize the Context at Test Time (2025) · cites this paper as Cover (1965)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping
Kriegeskorte, N., Simmons, W. K., Bellgowan, P. S. F., & Baker, C. I. (2009) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2303 · Cited by 2,696 · see citing works
Brain Computer Interfaces, a Review
Nicolas-Alonso, L. F., & Gomez-Gil, J. (2012) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s120201211 · Cited by 2,143 · see citing works
Neural syntax: cell assemblies, synapsembles, and readers
Buzsáki, G. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.023 · Cited by 1,289 · see citing works
On the capabilities of multilayer perceptrons
Baum, E. B. (1988) · Journal of Complexity · doi:10.1016/0885-064x(88)90020-9 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Automated Diagnosis of Neurological Disorders
Raghavendra, U., Acharya, U. R., & Adeli, H. (2019) · European Neurology · doi:10.1159/000504292 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Towards Quantum-Enhanced Machine Learning for Network Intrusion Detection
Gouveia, A., & Correia, M. (2020) · 2020 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA) · doi:10.1109/nca51143.2020.9306691 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Calibration of medical diagnostic classifier scores to the probability of disease
Chen, W., Sahiner, B., Samuelson, F., Pezeshk, A., & Petrick, N. (2018) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280216661371 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
A coherent perceptron for all-optical learning
Tezak, N., & Mabuchi, H. (2015) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-015-0023-3 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
ATLAS: Learning to Optimally Memorize the Context at Test Time
Behrouz, A., Li, Z., Kacham, P., Daliri, M., Deng, Y., Zhong, P., Razaviyayn, M., & Mirrokni, V. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.23735
- Authors
- Cover, T. M.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cover, Thomas M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Electronic Computers
- Published
- 1965-06
- Volume
- EC-14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 326-334
- ISSN
- 0367-7508 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161278885
- Cited by
- 2,044
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 101 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 51
- FWCI
- 8.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Electronic Computers (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- linear inequalities, combinatorial geometry, hyperplanes, Boolean functions, extreme points, generalization, pattern recognition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review