Cited by 2,044Neural Networks and ApplicationsMachine Learning and AlgorithmsStatistical Methods and Applications

Geometrical and Statistical Properties of Systems of Linear Inequalities with Applications in Pattern Recognition

Cover, Thomas M.·1965·IEEE Transactions on Electronic Computers

Abstract

This paper develops the separating capacities of families of nonlinear decision surfaces by a direct application of a theorem in classical combinatorial geometry. It is shown that a family of surfaces having d degrees of freedom has a natural separating capacity of 2d pattern vectors, thus extending and unifying results of Winder and others on the pattern-separating capacity of hyperplanes. Applying these ideas to the vertices of a binary n-cube yields bounds on the number of spherically, quadratically, and, in general, nonlinearly separable Boolean functions of n variables. It is shown that the set of all surfaces which separate a dichotomy of an infinite, random, separable set of pattern vectors can be characterized, on the average, by a subset of only 2d extreme pattern vectors. In addition, the problem of generalizing the classifications on a labeled set of pattern points to the classification of a new point is defined, and it is found that the probability of ambiguous generalization is large unless the number of training patterns exceeds the capacity of the set of separating surfaces.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/pgec.1965.264137

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early theoretical works established that even simple network architectures can memorize a significant number of input-output mappings, with capacity often related to the number of network parameters and the input dimensionality.

    “Early theoretical works established that even simple network architectures can memorize a significant number of inputoutput mappings, with capacity often related to the number of network parameters (e.g., weights and biases) and the input dimensionality Baum (1988), Cover (1965), and Huang (2003).”

    From ATLAS: Learning to Optimally Memorize the Context at Test Time (2025) · cites this paper as Cover (1965)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cover, T. M.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Cover, Thomas M.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Electronic Computers
Published
1965-06
Volume
EC-14
Issue
3
Pages
326-334
ISSN
0367-7508 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161278885
Cited by
2,044
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 101 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 51
FWCI
8.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Electronic Computers (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
Keywords
linear inequalities, combinatorial geometry, hyperplanes, Boolean functions, extreme points, generalization, pattern recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review