Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 644

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Recurrent neural networks for remaining useful life estimation

Heimes, Felix O.·2008·2008 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management

Abstract

This paper presents an approach and solution to the IEEE 2008 Prognostics and Health Management conference challenge problem. The solution utilizes an advanced recurrent neural network architecture to estimate the remaining useful life of the system. The recurrent neural network is trained with back-propagation through time gradient calculations, an Extended Kalman Filter training method, and evolutionary algorithms to generate an accurate and compact algorithm. This solution placed second overall in the competition with a very small margin between the first and second place finishers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/phm.2008.4711422

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 644

Metadata

Authors
Heimes, F. O.
Venue
2008 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2008-10
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W2110787940
Cited by
644
References
0
FWCI
6.82
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recurrent neural networks for remaining useful life estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/phm.2008.4711422
The paper
Heimes, F. O. (2008). Recurrent neural networks for remaining useful life estimation. 2008 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/phm.2008.4711422

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.