Cited by 6Advanced Wireless Communication TechniquesPAPR reduction in OFDMPower Line Communications and Noise

A Low Complexity ICFO Estimator and Compensator for IEEE 802.15.4g MR-OFDM PHY: Algorithm Proposal and Hardware Implementation

Alves-Tamagno, Denise C., de Lima, Eduardo, Lopes, Renato R.·2018·2018 IEEE 29th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC)

Abstract

This work proposes a novel algorithm and a hardware implementation for frequency-domain Integer Carrier Frequency Offset (ICFO) estimation and compensation, targeting the Multi-Rate and Multi-Regional Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (MR-OFDM) physical layer (PHY) of IEEE 802.15.4g, which is an amendment to IEEE 802.15.4 standard for supporting Smart Metering Utility Networks (SUN). The paper derives a simple closed-form for both ICFO estimation and compensation processes, by considering not only the shift in subcarrier indices as an effect of the ICFO, which is commonly seen in the literature, but also a phase accumulation resulting from the combined effect of the ICFO and the presence of a Cyclic Prefix (CP). We present an estimation method robust to both multipath channel and time offset, as well as a simple compensation scheme in the frequency domain, which makes uses only of shift and sign operations. We also detail the implemented architecture and present results of performance simulation and RTL synthesis. The simulation results show the algorithm is robust to symbol boundary error and to channel with exponential power delay profile, with good performance under low SNR, achieving a failure rate of 0.1% at -3dB for one of the studied cases. The synthesis targeting Altera Cyclone IV GX FPGA resulted in 8% of resource usage. This ICFO estimator/compensator is part of a project that aims to implement in ASIC the three PHYs defined in the standard and integrate them to build a system fully compliant to IEEE 802.15.4g.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/pimrc.2018.8580837

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 2011, IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks-Part 15 4 Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs), 1
  2. 2012, IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks-Part 15 4 Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs) Amendment 3 Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Low-Data-Rate Wireless Smart Metering Utility Networks, 1

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Alves-Tamagno, D. C., de Lima, E., & Lopes, R. R.
Affiliations
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
Venue
2018 IEEE 29th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-09
Pages
1-7
OpenAlex
W2906732388
Cited by
6
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.61
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › PAPR reduction in OFDM
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power Line Communications and Noise
Keywords
frequency-domain compensation, IEEE 802.15.4g, smart metering, cyclic prefix, closed-form estimation, low-complexity hardware, FPGA implementation, timing offset, power delay profile

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review