A Low Complexity ICFO Estimator and Compensator for IEEE 802.15.4g MR-OFDM PHY: Algorithm Proposal and Hardware Implementation
Abstract
This work proposes a novel algorithm and a hardware implementation for frequency-domain Integer Carrier Frequency Offset (ICFO) estimation and compensation, targeting the Multi-Rate and Multi-Regional Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (MR-OFDM) physical layer (PHY) of IEEE 802.15.4g, which is an amendment to IEEE 802.15.4 standard for supporting Smart Metering Utility Networks (SUN). The paper derives a simple closed-form for both ICFO estimation and compensation processes, by considering not only the shift in subcarrier indices as an effect of the ICFO, which is commonly seen in the literature, but also a phase accumulation resulting from the combined effect of the ICFO and the presence of a Cyclic Prefix (CP). We present an estimation method robust to both multipath channel and time offset, as well as a simple compensation scheme in the frequency domain, which makes uses only of shift and sign operations. We also detail the implemented architecture and present results of performance simulation and RTL synthesis. The simulation results show the algorithm is robust to symbol boundary error and to channel with exponential power delay profile, with good performance under low SNR, achieving a failure rate of 0.1% at -3dB for one of the studied cases. The synthesis targeting Altera Cyclone IV GX FPGA resulted in 8% of resource usage. This ICFO estimator/compensator is part of a project that aims to implement in ASIC the three PHYs defined in the standard and integrate them to build a system fully compliant to IEEE 802.15.4g.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Robust frequency and timing synchronization for OFDM
Schmidl, T. M., & Cox, D. C. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/26.650240 · Cited by 3,428 · see citing works
ML estimation of time and frequency offset in OFDM systems
van de Beek, J., Sandell, M., & Börjesson, P. O. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.599949 · Cited by 2,132 · see citing works
A robust timing and frequency synchronization for OFDM systems
Minn, H., Bhargava, V. K., & Letaief, K. B. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/twc.2003.814346 · Cited by 691 · see citing works
Robust Preamble Design for Synchronization, Signaling Transmission, and Channel Estimation
Gao, Z., Zhang, C., & Wang, Z. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting · doi:10.1109/tbc.2014.2376134 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Integer frequency offset recovery in OFDM transmissions over selective channels
Morelli, M., & Moretti, M. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/t-wc.2008.071144 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Efficient Integer Frequency Offset Estimation Architecture for Enhanced OFDM Synchronization
Pham, T. H., Fahmy, S. A., & McLoughlin, I. V. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems · doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2015.2453207 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Li, D., Li, Y., Zhang, H., et al. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2012.2195234 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
New Integer Normalized Carrier Frequency Offset Estimators
Zhan, Q., & Minn, H. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2015.2432743 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Robust integer frequency offset estimator with ambiguity of symbol timing offset for OFDM systems
Park, M., Cho, N., Cho, J., et al. (2003) · IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference · doi:10.1109/vetecf.2002.1040592 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Integer frequency offset recovery in OFDM systems
Abdzadeh-Ziabari, H., & Shayesteh, M. G. (2012) · Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications (APCC) · doi:10.1109/apcc.2012.6388273 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 2011, IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks-Part 15 4 Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs), 1
- 2012, IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks-Part 15 4 Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs) Amendment 3 Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Low-Data-Rate Wireless Smart Metering Utility Networks, 1
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Alves-Tamagno, D. C., de Lima, E., & Lopes, R. R.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
- ORCID
- Lopes, Renato R.
- Venue
- 2018 IEEE 29th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-09
- Pages
- 1-7
- OpenAlex
- W2906732388
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 1.61
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › PAPR reduction in OFDM
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power Line Communications and Noise
- Keywords
- frequency-domain compensation, IEEE 802.15.4g, smart metering, cyclic prefix, closed-form estimation, low-complexity hardware, FPGA implementation, timing offset, power delay profile
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review