The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A composite classifier system design: Concepts and methodology
Abstract
This study explores the scope for achieving enhanced recognition system performance through deployment of a composite classifier system consisting of two or more component classifiers which belong to different categories. The domains of deployment of these individual components (classifiers) are determined by optimal partitioning of the problem space. The criterion for such optimal partitioning is determined in each case by the characteristics of the classifier components. An example, in terms of partitioning the feature space for optimal deployment of a composite system consisting of the linear and nearest neighbor (NN) classifiers as its components, is presented to illustrate the concepts, the associated methodology, and the possible benefits one could expect through such composite classifier system design. Here, the optimality of the partitioning is dictated by the linear class separability limitation of the linear classifier and the computational demand characteristics of the NN classifier. Accordingly, the criterion for the optimal feature space partitioning is set to be the minimization of the domain of application of the NN classifier, subject to the constraint that the linear classifier is to be deployed only in regions satisfying the underlying assumption of linear separability of classes. While many alternatives are available for the solution of the resulting constrained optimization problem, a specific technique-Sequential Weight Increasing Factor Technique (SWIFT)- was employed here for convenience in view of previous successful experience with this technique in other application areas. Numerical results derived using the well-known IRIS data set are furnished to demonstrate the effectiveness of the new concepts and methodology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nearest neighbor pattern classification
Cover, T., & Hart, P. (1967) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1967.1053964 · Cited by 16,936
Cited by
Sagi, O., & Rokach, L. (2018) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1249 · Cited by 3,103
Rokach, L. (2010) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-009-9124-7 · Cited by 2,657
Dong, X., Yu, Z., Cao, W., Shi, Y., & Ma, Q. (2020) · Frontiers of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s11704-019-8208-z · Cited by 1,928
An improved boosting based on feature selection for corporate bankruptcy prediction
Wang, G., Ma, J., & Yang, S. (2014) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.09.033 · Cited by 187
EDLA-EFDS: A Novel Ensemble Deep Learning Approach For Electrical Fault Detection Systems
Elmasry, W., & Wadi, M. (2022) · Electric Power Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2022.107834 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Dasarathy, B. V., & Sheela, B. V.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the IEEE
- Published
- 1979
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 708-713
- ISSN
- 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169139688
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A composite classifier system design: Concepts and methodology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/proc.1979.11321
- The paper
- Dasarathy, B. V., & Sheela, B. V. (1979). A composite classifier system design: Concepts and methodology. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/proc.1979.11321
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.