Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A composite classifier system design: Concepts and methodology

Dasarathy, B.V., Sheela, B.V.·1979·Proceedings of the IEEE

Abstract

This study explores the scope for achieving enhanced recognition system performance through deployment of a composite classifier system consisting of two or more component classifiers which belong to different categories. The domains of deployment of these individual components (classifiers) are determined by optimal partitioning of the problem space. The criterion for such optimal partitioning is determined in each case by the characteristics of the classifier components. An example, in terms of partitioning the feature space for optimal deployment of a composite system consisting of the linear and nearest neighbor (NN) classifiers as its components, is presented to illustrate the concepts, the associated methodology, and the possible benefits one could expect through such composite classifier system design. Here, the optimality of the partitioning is dictated by the linear class separability limitation of the linear classifier and the computational demand characteristics of the NN classifier. Accordingly, the criterion for the optimal feature space partitioning is set to be the minimization of the domain of application of the NN classifier, subject to the constraint that the linear classifier is to be deployed only in regions satisfying the underlying assumption of linear separability of classes. While many alternatives are available for the solution of the resulting constrained optimization problem, a specific technique-Sequential Weight Increasing Factor Technique (SWIFT)- was employed here for convenience in view of previous successful experience with this technique in other application areas. Numerical results derived using the well-known IRIS data set are furnished to demonstrate the effectiveness of the new concepts and methodology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/proc.1979.11321

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 340

Metadata

Authors
Dasarathy, B. V., & Sheela, B. V.
Venue
Proceedings of the IEEE
Published
1979
Volume
67
Issue
5
Pages
708-713
ISSN
0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169139688
Cited by
340
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A composite classifier system design: Concepts and methodology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/proc.1979.11321
The paper
Dasarathy, B. V., & Sheela, B. V. (1979). A composite classifier system design: Concepts and methodology. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/proc.1979.11321

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.