Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 815

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Robust techniques for signal processing: A survey

Kassam, S.A., Poor, H.V.·1985·Proceedings of the IEEE

Abstract

In recent years there has been much interest in robustness issues in general and in robust signal processing schemes in particular. Robust schemes are useful in situations where imprecise a priori knowledge of input characteristics makes the sensitivity of performance to deviations from assumed conditions an important factor in the design of good signal processing schemes. In this survey we discuss the minimax approach for the design of robust methods for signal processing. This has proven to be a very useful approach because it leads to constructive procedures for designing robust schemes. Our emphasis is on the contributions which have been made in robust signal processing, although key results of other robust statistical procedures are also considered. Most of the results we survey have been obtained in the past fifteen years, although some interesting earlier ideas for minimax signal processing are also mentioned. This survey is organized into five main parts, which deal separately with robust linear filters for signal estimation, robust linear filters for signal detection and related applications, nonlinear methods for robust signal detection, nonlinear methods for robust estimation, and robust data quantization. The interrelationships among many of these results are also discussed in the survey.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/proc.1985.13167

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 815

Metadata

Authors
Kassam, S. A., & Poor, H. V.
Venue
Proceedings of the IEEE
Published
1985
Volume
73
Issue
3
Pages
433-481
ISSN
0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045021643
Cited by
815
References
48
FWCI
15.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.