Cited by 6solar cell performance optimizationSilicon and Solar Cell TechnologiesAdvanced Energy Technologies and Civil Engineering Innovations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Qualification of 32% BOL and 28% EOL Efficient XTE Solar Cells

Chiu, Philip T., Law, Daniel C., Fetzer, Chris M., Haddad, Moran, Mesropian, Shoghig, Cravens, Rob, Hebert, Pete H., Ermer, James H., Krogen, Jeffrey P.·2019·2019 IEEE 46th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC)

Abstract

An advanced version of the XTJ family of space solar cells called XTJ Targeted Environment (XTE) has passed AIAA S-111 cell level qualification at Spectrolab. The XTE SF (standard fluence) and HF (high fluence) variants have demonstrated an average AM0 efficiencies of 32.2% and 32.0% at standard test conditions respectively in the qualification build. The EOL efficiency post 1e15 e-/cm2, 1 MeV irradiation for the XTE-SF and HF are at 28%. The XTE LILT cells have also achieved a JPL validated BOL efficiency of 36% under AM0 9.5 AU, -165°C, Saturn conditions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/pvsc40753.2019.8981370

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The MPP calculation depends on parameters including relative positioning to the Sun, PV cell type, operating temperature, and total solar irradiation.

    “The MPP calculation depends on the number of parameters such as relative positioning to the Sun, PV cell type, operating temperature, and total solar irradiation [117], [118].”

    From A Comprehensive Review on Small Satellite Microgrids (2022) · cites this paper as [117]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 6 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 2014, AIAA S-111A-2014 Standard, Qualification and Quality Requirements for Space Solar Cells
  2. 2012, Space engineering, Photovoltaic assemblies and components, ECSS-E-ST-20-08C Rev 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chiu, P. T., Law, D. C., Fetzer, C. M., Haddad, M., Mesropian, S., Cravens, R., Hebert, P. H., Ermer, J. H., & Krogen, J. P.
Affiliations
  • Boeing (United States) (US)
  • Spectrolab Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Boeing Company,Sylmar,CA,USA,91342
Venue
2019 IEEE 46th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-06
Pages
1506-1509
ISSN
0160-8371 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3004695779
Cited by
6
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.19
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Conference record of the IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › solar cell performance optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Nuclear Energy and Engineering › Advanced Energy Technologies and Civil Engineering Innovations
Keywords
space solar cells, high fluence irradiation, low-temperature irradiation, high-temperature irradiation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review