Software transparency as a key requirement for self-driving cars
Abstract
Self-Driving cars is a fast-growing area of study both in academia and industry. It is part of a broader domain which involves the development of software for Highly Automated Vehicles (HAV) and notions extracted from Artificial Intelligence/Autonomous Systems (AI/AS). There are many challenges that must be overcome to deliver self-driving cars in a manner that is readily accepted by consumers and society. Studies have shown that although many people are comfortable with the idea of AI helping them to operate their houses or schedule appointments, not many people are comfortable with the idea of cars being driven by AI algorithms. At the same time, insurance companies are concerned about vehicle liability issues and how to demonstrate who/what caused an accident. We believe that self-driving cars that demonstrate transparency in their operations will increase consumer trust which is pivotal to its acceptance and will pave the way for its commercialization and daily use. In this work, we investigate how to pursue the elicitation and modeling of transparency as a Non-Functional Requirement (NFR) to produce self-driving cars that are more robust.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Transparency serves as a basic requirement to build the public's trust in AI systems.
“On the whole, transparency serves as a basic requirement to build the public's trust in AI systems [178, 21, 189].”
From Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices (2023) · cites this paper as [21]
Cites
When human beings are like drunk robots: Driverless vehicles, ethics, and the future of transport
Sparrow, R., & Howard, M. (2017) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2017.04.014 · Cited by 182 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The decision will have to be considered under some ethical and moral code of conduct [21].”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Explainable artificial intelligence: an analytical review
Angelov, P. P., Soares, E. A., Jiang, R., Arnold, N. I., & Atkinson, P. M. (2021) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1424 · Cited by 843 · see citing works
Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices
Li, B., Qi, P., Liu, B., Di, S., Liu, J., Pei, J., Yi, J., & Zhou, B. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3555803 · Cited by 612 · see citing works
Transparency and explainability of AI systems: From ethical guidelines to requirements
Balasubramaniam, N., Kauppinen, M., Rannisto, A., Hiekkanen, K., & Kujala, S. (2023) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107197 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
A Survey of Data-driven and Knowledge-aware eXplainable AI
Li, X.-H., Cao, C. C., Shi, Y., Bai, W., Gao, H., Qiu, L., Wang, C., Gao, Y., Zhang, S., Xue, X., et al. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2020.2983930 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cysneiros, L. M., Raffi, M., & Sampaio do Prado Leite, J. C.
- Affiliations
- York University (CA)
- Venue
- 2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-08
- Pages
- 382-387
- OpenAlex
- W2897892437
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 1.83
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
- Keywords
- autonomous vehicles, program transparency, non-functional requirements, highly automated vehicles, consumer trust, autonomous systems, accident causes, robustness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review