Cited by 61Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Safety Systems Engineering in AutonomyAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies

Software transparency as a key requirement for self-driving cars

Cysneiros, Luiz Marcio, Raffi, Majid, Sampaio do Prado Leite, Julio Cesar·2018·2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)

Abstract

Self-Driving cars is a fast-growing area of study both in academia and industry. It is part of a broader domain which involves the development of software for Highly Automated Vehicles (HAV) and notions extracted from Artificial Intelligence/Autonomous Systems (AI/AS). There are many challenges that must be overcome to deliver self-driving cars in a manner that is readily accepted by consumers and society. Studies have shown that although many people are comfortable with the idea of AI helping them to operate their houses or schedule appointments, not many people are comfortable with the idea of cars being driven by AI algorithms. At the same time, insurance companies are concerned about vehicle liability issues and how to demonstrate who/what caused an accident. We believe that self-driving cars that demonstrate transparency in their operations will increase consumer trust which is pivotal to its acceptance and will pave the way for its commercialization and daily use. In this work, we investigate how to pursue the elicitation and modeling of transparency as a Non-Functional Requirement (NFR) to produce self-driving cars that are more robust.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/re.2018.00-21

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transparency serves as a basic requirement to build the public's trust in AI systems.

    “On the whole, transparency serves as a basic requirement to build the public's trust in AI systems [178, 21, 189].”

    From Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices (2023) · cites this paper as [21]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cysneiros, L. M., Raffi, M., & Sampaio do Prado Leite, J. C.
Affiliations
York University (CA)
Venue
2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-08
Pages
382-387
OpenAlex
W2897892437
Cited by
61
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6
FWCI
1.83
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Keywords
autonomous vehicles, program transparency, non-functional requirements, highly automated vehicles, consumer trust, autonomous systems, accident causes, robustness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review