Cited by 844Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Ethics and Social Impacts of AISoftware Testing and Debugging Techniques

Explainable artificial intelligence: an analytical review

Open access
Angelov, Plamen P., Soares, Eduardo A., Jiang, Richard, Arnold, Nicholas I., Atkinson, Peter M.·2021·WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery

Abstract

This paper provides a brief analytical review of the current state‐of‐the‐art in relation to the explainability of artificial intelligence in the context of recent advances in machine learning and deep learning. The paper starts with a brief historical introduction and a taxonomy, and formulates the main challenges in terms of explainability building on the recently formulated National Institute of Standards four principles of explainability. Recently published methods related to the topic are then critically reviewed and analyzed. Finally, future directions for research are suggested. This article is categorized under: Technologies > Artificial Intelligence Fundamental Concepts of Data and Knowledge > Explainable AI

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/widm.1424

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Angelov et al. provides an analytical review of explainable artificial intelligence methods with a focus on developing AI models that are transparent and interpretable to humans.

    “An early survey on the matter by Angelov et al. [68] provides an analytical review of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods with a focus on developing AI models that are transparent and interpretable to humans.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Robinson A. J., 2001, Handbook of automated reasoning
  2. Soares E. Angelov P. Biaso S. Froes M. H. &Abe D. K.(2020).SARS‐Cov‐2 CT‐scan dataset: A large dataset of real patients CT scans for SARS‐Cov‐2 identification.medRxiv.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Angelov, P. P., Soares, E. A., Jiang, R., Arnold, N. I., & Atkinson, P. M.
Affiliations
Lancaster University (GB)
Corresponding author
Angelov, Plamen P.
Venue
WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-07-12
Volume
11
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 1942-4787 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-4795
OpenAlex
W3182546273
Cited by
843
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 139 · 2025: 226 · 2024: 216 · 2023: 167 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 11
FWCI
42.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/P009727/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
Keywords
explainable AI, explainability, machine learning, deep learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review