CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 61

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the Relation of Trust and Explainability: Why to Engineer for Trustworthiness

Kastner, Lena, Langer, Markus, Lazar, Veronika, Schomacker, Astrid, Speith, Timo, Sterz, Sarah·2021·2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW)
DOI 10.1109/rew53955.2021.00031
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/rew53955.2021.00031

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 90

  1. gilpin, 2018, Explaining explanations to society, NIPS Workshop on Ethical Social and Governance Issues in AI, 1
  2. 10.1145/2594473.2594475 · DOI
  3. baum, 2018, Towards a framework combining machine ethics and machine explainability, Proceedings 3rd Workshop on formal reasoning about Causation Responsibility and Explanations in Science and Technology (CREST), 286, 34
  4. baum, 2018, From machine ethics to machine explainability and back, International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics, 1
  5. 10.1145/3331184.3331211 · DOI
  6. 10.1145/3027063.3053114 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.artint.2021.103503 · DOI
  8. clos, 2017, Towards explainable text classification by jointly learning lexicon and modifier terms, Proceedings of the IJCAI 2017 Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), 19
  9. 10.1145/3173574.3174156 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.18653/v1/W19-8404 · DOI
  11. 10.1145/3183399.3183424 · DOI
  12. 10.18653/v1/W19-8403 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/978-3-030-22868-2_90 · DOI
  14. 10.1177/1541931218621047 · DOI
  15. 10.1145/3287560.3287574 · DOI · Paper page
  16. de graaf, 2017, How people explain action (and autonomous intelligent systems should too), AAAI Fall Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Human-Robot Interaction, 19
  17. 10.1145/3290605.3300831 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1007/978-3-642-39265-8_7 · DOI · Paper page
  19. olson, 2019, Counterfactual states for atari agents via generative deep learning, Proceedings of the IJCAI 2019 Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), 87
  20. sheh, 2017, ‘Why did you do that?’ Explainable intelligent robots, 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 628
  21. sevastjanova, 2018, Going beyond visualization: Verbalization as complementary medium to explain machine learning models, Workshop on Visualization for AI Explainability at IEEE VIS
  22. schneider, 2019, Personalized explanation for machine learning: A conceptualization, 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS)
  23. 10.2197/ipsjjip.27.720 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/s10458-019-09408-y · DOI
  25. 10.1002/hbe2.117 · DOI
  26. 10.1145/2939672.2939778 · DOI · Paper page
  27. ras, 2018, Explanation methods in deep learning: Users, values, concerns and challenges, Explainable and Interpretable Models in Computer Vision and Machine Learning, 19, 10.1007/978-3-319-98131-4_2 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1145/1378773.1378804 · DOI
  29. 10.1145/3290605.3300233 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 2018, Systems and software engineering - Life cycle processes - Requirements engineering, International Organization for Standardization Standard ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148
  31. chazette, 2021, Exploring explainability: A definition, a model, and a knowledge catalogue, IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), 10.1109/RE51729.2021.00025 · DOI
  32. langer, 2021, What do we want from explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)? - A stakeholder perspective on XAI and a conceptual model guiding interdisciplinary XAI research, Articificial Intelligence, 296
  33. 10.1109/RE.2019.00046 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/s00766-020-00333-1 · DOI
  35. 10.1109/DSAA.2018.00018 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.24963/ijcai.2019/194 · DOI
  37. michael, 2019, Machine coaching, Proceedings of the IJCAI 2019 Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), 80
  38. madumal, 2019, A grounded interaction protocol for explainable artificial intelligence, Proc of International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 1033
  39. 10.1145/3236009 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1145/1639714.1639768 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/widm.1312 · DOI · Paper page
  42. henin, 2019, Towards a generic framework for blackbox explanation methods, Proceedings of the IJCAI 2019 Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), 28
  43. 10.1145/3282878 · DOI
  44. weber, 2019, Explaining citation recommendations: Abstracts or full texts?, Proceedings of the IJCAI 2019 Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), 136
  45. watts, 2019, Local score dependent model explanation for time dependent covariates, Proceedings of the IJCAI 2019 Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), 129
  46. 10.1145/3209978.3210010 · DOI
  47. papenmeier, 2019, How model accuracy and explanation fidelity influence user trust in AI, Proceedings of the IJCAI 2019 Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), 94
  48. chakraborti, 2019, Plan explanations as model reconciliation, ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction, 258
  49. 10.1007/s10796-015-9577-y · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.036 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1007/s13218-018-0559-3 · DOI
  52. 10.1145/3351095.3372870 · DOI
  53. 10.24963/ijcai.2018/836 · DOI
  54. sreedharan, 2018, Handling model uncertainty and multiplicity in explanations via model reconciliation, Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, 28, 518, 10.1609/icaps.v28i1.13930 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/S0004-3702(83)80014-9 · DOI
  56. 10.1145/1297231.1297275 · DOI
  57. 10.1145/1297231.1297259 · DOI
  58. 10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_15 · DOI
  59. ter hoeve, 2017, Do news consumers want explanations for personalized news rankings?, Workshop on Responsible Recommendation
  60. 2016, Systems and software engineering - Systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE) - Measurement of quality in use, International Organization for Standardization Standard ISO/IEC 24745
  61. 10.1145/1502650.1502661 · DOI
  62. 10.1007/978-1-4842-3799-1_6 · DOI
  63. 10.1177/0018720811406725 · DOI
  64. 10.1080/14639220500535301 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1145/3240323.3240354 · DOI
  67. 10.1145/3442188.3445923 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.13189/ujca.2013.010204 · DOI
  69. 10.18653/v1/W17-3701 · DOI
  70. polley, 2021, Towards trustworthiness in the context of explainable search, Proceedings of ACM SIGIR International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 2580
  71. 10.1007/s11023-019-09509-3 · DOI
  72. pierrard, 2019, A new approach for explainable multiple organ annotation with few data, Proceedings of the IJCAI 2019 Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), 101
  73. 10.1609/aimag.v32i3.2365 · DOI
  74. richardson, 2018, A survey of interpretability and explainability in human-agent systems, Proceedings of the IJCAI/ECAI Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), 137
  75. anjomshoae, 2019, Explainable agents and robots: Results from a systematic literature review, Proc of International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 1078
  76. fox, 2017, Explainable planning, Proceedings of the IJCAI 2017 Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), 24
  77. 10.1007/978-3-030-30391-4_6 · DOI
  78. nalepa, 2018, From context mediation to declarative values and explainability, Proceedings of the IJCAI/ECAI 2018 Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), 109
  79. atzmueller, 2019, Towards socio-technical design of explicative systems: Transparent, interpretable and explainable analytics and its perspectives in social interaction contexts information, Proceedings of the 2019 Workshop on Affective Computing and Context Awareness in Ambient Intelligence (AfCAI), 1
  80. 10.1007/s11023-019-09502-w · DOI
  81. 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106837 · DOI · Paper page
  82. 10.2307/249487 · DOI · Paper page
  83. 10.1007/978-3-030-23528-4_25 · DOI · Paper page
  84. 10.5465/amj.2007.0572 · DOI
  85. 10.1111/ijsa.12325 · DOI
  86. pappas, 2017, Internalist vs. Externalist Conceptions of Epistemic Justification, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  87. mcleod, 2020, Trust, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  88. hardin, 2002, Trust and trustworthiness, Russell Sage Foundation
  89. 10.1093/oso/9780198843900.001.0001 · DOI
  90. 10.1086/667838 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kastner, L., Langer, M., Lazar, V., Schomacker, A., Speith, T., & Sterz, S.
Venue
2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-09
Pages
169-175
DOI
10.1109/rew53955.2021.00031
Cited by
61
References
15
Licence
Funders
Volkswagen Foundation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review