The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Including Human Factors and Ergonomics in Requirements Engineering for Digital Work Environments
Abstract
Digital technology plays an important role in our work places, and much time is spent in the virtual environments that technology provides. However, today's digital work environments are often cumbersome and hard to use, and contribute to stress and ill-health with subsequent cost to the individual, to their employers and to society. Our long-term aim is to facilitate the development of IT systems that provide a healthy digital work environment by including a human factors and ergonomics (HFE) perspective in the requirements engineering (RE) process. IT systems can then be better adapted to professional users, rather than forcing them to adapt work processes to the tools provided. As a first step, we performed an exploratory case study of a recently implemented IT system at a major Nordic bank to identify relevant aspects of HFE to consider within RE. The study consisted of a literature review, observations and interviews. We present eight factors covering user support such as documentation and training, and system characteristics such as understandability, ease of learning, ease of remembering, user satisfaction, system interplay and work-process interplay. These initial results may support non-HFE experts in including these aspects in RE for digital work environments. The results are also a starting point for further research into incorporating HFE in RE.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In our previous research on digital work environments, we have identified systems interplay and work interplay as two important factors to consider in RE for systems and tools intended to be used in the work place, i.e. the interaction with other systems and with current work practices.
“In our previous research on digital work environments, we have identified systems interplay and work interplay as two important factors to consider in RE for systems and tools intended to be used in the work place, i.e. the interaction with other systems and with current work practices (Håkansson and Bjarnason 2020).”
From An empirically based model of software prototyping: a mapping study and a multi-case study (2023) · cites this paper as Håkansson and Bjarnason 2020
Citations
Cites
Human factors and usability for health information technology: old and new challenges
Carayon, P., & Hoonakker, P. (2019) · Yearbook of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0039-1677907 · Cited by 179
Technostress Research: A Nurturing Ground for Measurement Pluralism?
University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Fischer, T., Riedl, R., & University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria and University of Linz (2017) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.04017 · Cited by 127
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 52
- 10.1109/ICSITech.2017.8257134 · DOI
- 10.1080/01449290500196963 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.01.010 · DOI
- 10.7861/futurehosp.15.015 · DOI
- håkansson, 2019, MSC
- 10.1016/j.jss.2006.07.009 · DOI · Paper page
- preece, 2001, Interaction Design Beyond Human–Computer Interaction
- 10.1007/s10916-008-9180-6 · DOI
- 10.1145/1995376.1995403 · DOI · Paper page
- sonde, 2008, Is your ERP system still falling short?, Financial Exec, 24, 52
- 10.1007/978-3-319-45916-5_9 · DOI
- 10.1109/RE.2009.16 · DOI
- 10.1002/9781118181034 · DOI
- sandblad, 2018, Digitaliseringen och arbetsmiljön, Studentlitteratur
- schaefer, 2018, Working and Organizing in the Digital Age, The Pufendorf Inst for Adv Studies
- 10.1007/978-3-642-02050-6_19 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.infsof.2019.01.009 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00259.x · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-45916-5_4 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-45916-5_1 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-45916-5_3 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-45916-5_2 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1389-1286(99)00044-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1386-5056(01)00203-9 · DOI
- yin, 2017, Case study research and applications Design and methods
- lauesen, 1998, Six Styles for Usability Requirements, presented at the Requirements Engineering Foundation for Software Quality, 98, 155
- 10.1109/MIS.2002.1039830 · DOI
- 10.1080/00140138408963539 · DOI
- 10.1109/DEST.2013.6611328 · DOI
- 10.1109/IEEM.2017.8290059 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-391063-9.00049-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-391063-9.00050-X · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.07.007 · DOI
- 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000536 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jss.2016.01.024 · DOI
- 10.1109/RE.2011.6051639 · DOI
- lauesen, 2002, Software Requirements Styles and Techniques
- brod, 1984, Technostress The Human Cost of the Computer Revolution
- 10.1080/01449290310001624356 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10926-007-9108-x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.07.001 · DOI
- brambilla, 2014, Interaction Flow Modeling Language Model-Driven UI Engineering of Web and Mobile Apps with IFML
- 10.1109/CHASE.2019.00030 · DOI
- 10.1080/00140139.2012.661087 · DOI
- 10.1111/ijpp.12296 · DOI
- lundin, 2020, Shaping thought through action: A study of the use and design of technical information, PhD thesis
- paternò, 2002, CiteSeerX — ConcurTaskTrees: An Engineered Approach to Model-based Design of Interactive Systems, The Handbook of Analysis for Human-Computer Interaction, 483
- garcía, 2008, Model-Driven Approach to Design User Interfaces for Workflow Information Systems, J Univers Comput Sci, 14, 14
- 10.1080/13594329608414866 · DOI
- 10.1177/1460458215592915 · DOI
- 10.1145/2503859.2503866 · DOI
- 10.1145/1166324.1166346 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An empirically based model of software prototyping: a mapping study and a multi-case study
Bjarnason, E., Lang, F., & Mjöberg, A. (2023) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-023-10331-w · Cited by 75
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hakansson, E., & Bjarnason, E.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- ORCID
- Bjarnason, Elizabeth
- Venue
- 2020 IEEE First International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Well-Being, Aging, and Health (REWBAH)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2020-08
- Pages
- 57-66
- OpenAlex
- W3092469660
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Ergonomics and Human Factors
- Keywords
- human factors and ergonomics, requirements engineering, digital workplace, user support, ease of learning, user satisfaction, occupational stress, user-centered design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review