Cited by 127Technostress in Professional SettingsInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationStress and Burnout Research

Technostress Research: A Nurturing Ground for Measurement Pluralism?

Open access
University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Fischer, Thomas, Riedl, René, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria and University of Linz·2017·Communications of the Association for Information Systems

Abstract

Because technostress research is multidisciplinary in nature and, therefore, benefits from insights gained from various research disciplines, we expected a high degree of measurement pluralism in technostress studies published in the information systems (IS) literature. However, because IS research mostly relies on self-report measures in general, reasons exist to also assume that technostress research has largely neglected multi-method research designs. To assess the status quo of technostress research with respect to the application of multi-method approaches, we analyzed 103 empirical studies. Specifically, we analyzed the types of data-collection methods used and the investigated components of the technostress process (person, environment, stressors, strains, and coping). The results indicate that multi-method research is more prevalent in the IS technostress literature (approximately 37% of reviewed studies) than in the general IS literature (approximately 20% as reported in previous reviews). However, our findings also show that IS technostress studies significantly rely on self-report measures. We argue that technostress research constitutes a nurturing ground for the application of multi-method approaches and multidisciplinary collaboration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17705/1cais.04017

Cites

158 of 158 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Leadership is ascribed an increasingly important role in the context of technostress.

    “and technostress (Fischer and Riedl 2017;Salazar-Concha et al. 2021)”

    From Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Fischer and Riedl 2017

    The Introduction describes technostress as an increasingly important research topic, but does not assign an increasingly important role to leadership. The Organization section discusses organizational culture and technical support; searches for leadership, supervisors, and management did not find a passage making the claimed point. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Berg, M., & Arnetz, B. B. (1996). An occupational study of employees with VDU-associated symptoms: The importance of stress. Stress Medicine, 12(1), 51-54.
  2. Kahn, R. L., & Byosiere, P. (1992). Stress in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2 nd ed., pp. 571-650). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  3. Kasl, S. V. (1978). Epidemiological contributions to the study of work stress. In C. L. Cooper & R. Payne (Eds.), Stress at work (pp. 3-48). Chichester: Wiley.
  4. McGrath, J. E. (1976). Stress and behavior in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1351-1395). Chicago: Rand McNally College Pub.
  5. 0092-0703) Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science http://www.springer.com/business+%26+management/journal/ 11747 (1533-4406) New England Journal of Medicine http://www.nejm.org/ (1526-5455) Organization Science http://pubsonline.informs.org/journal/orsc (0018-9219) Proceedings of the IEEE http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=5 (1094-9054) Reference and User Services Quarterly https://journals.ala.org/rusq (0090-7324) Reference Services Review http://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/rsr.htm (1795-990X) Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health https://www.jstor.org/journal/scanjworkenvihea (1533-8525) Sociological Quarterly http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1533- 8525 (1532-2998) Stress and Health http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1532- 2998 (0040-1625) Technological Forecasting and Social Change http://www.journals.elsevier.com/technological-forecasting- and-social-change (0736-5853) Telematics and Informatics http://www.journals.elsevier.com/telematics-and-informatics (1464-5335) Work and Stress http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/twst20/current · DOI
  6. Berg, M., Arnetz, B. B., Lidén, S., Eneroth, P., & Kallner, A. (1992). Techno-stress: A psychophysiological study of employees with VDU-associated skin complaints. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 34(7), 698-701.
  7. Emurian, H. H. (1993). Cardiovascular and electromyograph effects of low and high density work on an interactive information system. Computers in Human Behavior, 9(4), 353-370.
  8. Arnetz, B. B. (1996). Techno-stress: A prospective psychophysiological study of the impact of a controlled stress-reduction program in advanced telecommunication systems design work. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 38(1), 53-65.
  9. Berg, M., & Arnetz, B. B. (1996). An occupational study of employees with VDU-associated symptoms: The importance of stress. Stress Medicine, 12(1), 51-54.
  10. Korunka, C., Huemer, K., Litschauer, B., Karetta, B., & Kafka-Lützow, A. (1996). Working with new technologies: Hormone excretion as an indicator for sustained arousal. A pilot study. Biological Psychology, 42(3), 439-452.
  11. Wastell, D., & Newman, M. (1996). Information system design, stress and organisational change in the ambulance services: A tale of two cities. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 6(4), 283-300.
  12. Wastell, D. G., & Newman, M. (1996). Stress, control and computer system design: A psychophysiological field study. Behaviour & Information Technology, 15(3), 183-192.
  13. Arnetz, B. B., Berg, M., & Arnetz, J. (1997). Mental strain and physical symptoms among employees in modern offices. Archives of Environmental Health, 52(1), 63-67.
  14. Birdi, K. S., & Zapf, D. (1997). Age differences in reactions to errors in computer-based work. Behaviour & Information Technology, 16(6), 309-319.
  15. Boucsein, W., & Thum, M. (1997). Design of work/rest schedules for computer work based on psychophysiological recovery measures. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 20, 51-57.
  16. Wiholm, C., & Arnetz, B. B. (1997). Musculoskeletal symptoms and headaches in VDU users-a psychophysiological study. Work & Stress, 11(3), 239-250.
  17. Kaluzniacky, E. (2000). Work stress among information systems professionals in Manitoba. In Proceedings of the Information Resources Management Association International Conference.
  18. Gallivan, M. (2003). Examining gender differences in IT professionals' perceptions of job stress in response to technological change. In M. Mandviwalla & E. Trauth (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGMIS Conference on Computer Personnel Research (pp. 10-23).
  19. Voakes, P. S., Beam, R. A., & Ogan, C. (2003). The impact of technological change on journalism education: A survey of faculty and administrators. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 57(4), 318-334.
  20. Bailey, B. P., & Konstan, J. A. (2006). On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(4), 685-708.
  21. Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B., & Ragu-Nathan, T. (2007). The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301-328.
  22. Ye, Z., Abe, Y., Kusano, Y., Takamura, N., Eida, K., Takemoto, T.-I., & Aoyagi, K. (2007). The influence of visual display terminal use on the physical and mental conditions of administrative staff in Japan. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 26(2), 69-73.
  23. Al-Fudail, M., & Mellar, H. (2008). Investigating teacher stress when using technology. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1103-1110.
  24. Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417-433.
  25. Wang, K., Shu, Q., & Tu, Q. (2008). Technostress under different organizational environments: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 3002-3013.
  26. Ahmad, U. N. U., Amin, S. M., & Ismail, W. K. W. (2009). The impact of technostress on organisational commitment among Malaysian academic librarians. Singapore Journal of Library & Information Management, 38, 103-123.
  27. Barley, S. R., Meyerson, D. E., & Grodal, S. (2011). E-mail as a source and symbol of stress. Organization Science, 22(4), 887-906.
  28. Chen, A. J., & Karahanna, E. (2011). Personal life interrupted: Understanding the effects of technology- mediated interruptions from work to personal life. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems.
  29. Shu, Q., Tu, Q., & Wang, K. (2011). The impact of computer self-efficacy and technology dependence on computer-related technostress: A social cognitive theory perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27(10), 923-939.
  30. Eckhardt, A., Maier, C., & Buettner, R. (2012). The influence of pressure to perform and experience on changing perceptions and user performance: A multi-method experimental analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems.
  31. Maier, C., Laumer, S., Eckhardt, A., & Weitzel, T. (2012). When social networking turns to social overload: Explaining the stress, emotional exhaustion, and quitting behavior from social network sites' users. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems.
  32. Riedl, R., Kindermann, H., Auinger, A., & Javor, A. (2013). Computer breakdown as a stress factor during task completion under time pressure: Identifying gender differences based on skin conductance. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2013(1), 1-8.
  33. Yan, Z., Guo, X., Lee, M. K., & Vogel, D. R. (2013). A conceptual model of technology features and technostress in telemedicine communication. Information Technology & People, 26(3), 283-297.
  34. D'Arcy, J., Herath, T., & Shoss, M. K. (2014). Understanding employee responses to stressful information security requirements: A coping perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31(2), 285-318.
  35. Maier, C., Laumer, S., Eckhardt, A., & Weitzel, T. (2014). Giving too much social support: Social overload on social networking sites. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(5), 447-464
  36. Sellberg, C., & Susi, T. (2014). Technostress in the office: A distributed cognition perspective on human- technology interaction. Cognition, Technology & Work, 16(2), 187-201.
  37. Tams, S., Hill, K., Ortiz de Guinea, Ana, Thatcher, J., & Grover, V. (2014). NeuroIS-alternative or complement to existing methods? Illustrating the holistic effects of neuroscience and self-reported data in the context of technostress research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15(10), 723-753.
  38. Tarafdar, M., Pullins, E. B., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2014). Examining impacts of technostress on the professional salesperson's behavioural performance. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 34(1), 51-69.
  39. Wang, X., Ye, S., & Teo, H.-H. (2014). Effects of interruptions on creative thinking. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems.
  40. Galluch, P., Grover, V., & Thatcher, J. B. (2015). Interrupting the workplace: Examining stressors in an information technology context. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16(1), 1-47.
  41. Maier, C., Laumer, S., Weinert, C., & Weitzel, T. (2015). The effects of technostress and switching stress on discontinued use of social networking services: A study of Facebook use. Information Systems Journal, 25(3), 275-308.
  42. Moody, G. D., & Galletta, D. F. (2015). Lost in cyberspace: The impact of information scent and time constraints on stress, performance, and attitudes online. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(1), 192-224.
  43. Nastjuk, I., & Kolbe, L. (2015). On the duality of stress in information systems research-the case of electric vehicles. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems.
  44. Neben, T., & Schneider, C. (2015). Ad intrusiveness, loss of control, and stress: A psychophysiological study. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems.
  45. Salo, M., Makkonen, M., & Hekkala, R. (2015). "I just cursed and opened a beer": Explaining mobile users' non-complaining behavior through coping. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems.
  46. Srivastava, S. C., Chandra, S., & Shirish, A. (2015). Technostress creators and job outcomes: Theorising the moderating influence of personality traits. Information Systems Journal, 25(4), 355-401.
  47. Tarafdar, M., Pullins, E. B., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2015). Technostress: Negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. Information Systems Journal, 25(2), 103-132.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Fischer, T., Riedl, R., & University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria and University of Linz
Affiliations
Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
Corresponding author
Fischer, Thomas
Venue
Communications of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2017
Volume
40
Pages
375-401
ISSN
1529-3181 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2618549554
Cited by
127
References
157
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
12.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications of the Association for Information Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of the Association for Information Systems (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
technostress, multi-method research, self-report measures, multidisciplinary collaboration, coping, information systems research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review