The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A semantic model for authentication protocols
Abstract
The authors specify authentication protocols as formal objects with precise syntax and semantics, and define a semantic model that characterizes protocol executions. They have identified two basic types of correctness properties, namely, correspondence and secrecy; that underlie the correctness concerns of authentication protocols. Assertions for specifying these properties, and a formal semantics for their satisfaction in the semantic model are defined. The Otway-Rees protocol is used to illustrate the semantic model and the basic correctness properties.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the security of public key protocols
Dolev, D., & Yao, A. (1983) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1983.1056650 · Cited by 5,833
Burrows, M., Abadi, M., & Needham, R. (1990) · ACM Transactions on Computer Systems · doi:10.1145/77648.77649 · Cited by 2,523
Belief, awareness, and limited reasoning
Fagin, R., & Halpern, J. Y. (1987) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(87)90003-8 · Cited by 885
Timestamps in key distribution protocols
Denning, D. E., & Sacco, G. M. (1981) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358722.358740 · Cited by 682
Burrows, M., Abadi, M., & Needham, R. (1989) · Proceedings of the twelfth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles · doi:10.1145/74850.74852 · Cited by 641
Reasoning about belief in cryptographic protocols
Gong, L., Needham, R., & Yahalom, R. (1990) · Proceedings. 1990 IEEE Computer Society Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/risp.1990.63854 · Cited by 628
A logic of implicit and explicit belief
Levesque, H. J. (1984) · Cited by 560
Authentication in distributed systems: a bibliography
Liebl, A. (1993) · ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review · doi:10.1145/163640.163643 · Cited by 534
Efficient and timely mutual authentication
Otway, D., & Rees, O. (1987) · ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review · doi:10.1145/24592.24594 · Cited by 335
A semantics for a logic of authentication (extended abstract)
Abadi, M., & Tuttle, M. R. (1991) · Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing - PODC '91 · doi:10.1145/112600.112618 · Cited by 219
Cited by
Entity Authentication and Key Distribution
Bellare, M., & Rogaway, P. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48329-2_21 · Cited by 1,752
A secure way of exchanging the secret keys in advanced metering infrastructure
Thomas, M. S., Ali, I., & Gupta, N. (2012) · 2012 IEEE International Conference on Power System Technology (POWERCON) · doi:10.1109/powercon.2012.6401418 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Woo, T. Y. C., & Lam, S. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings 1993 IEEE Computer Society Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc. Press
- Published
- 2002-12-31
- Pages
- 178-194
- OpenAlex
- W2104130981
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 17.05
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A semantic model for authentication protocols. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/risp.1993.287633
- The paper
- Woo, T. Y. C., & Lam, S. S. (2002). A semantic model for authentication protocols. Proceedings 1993 IEEE Computer Society Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy. https://doi.org/10.1109/risp.1993.287633
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
