Cited by 13Smart Grid Security and ResilienceAdvanced Authentication Protocols SecuritySecurity in Wireless Sensor Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A secure way of exchanging the secret keys in advanced metering infrastructure

Thomas, M. S., Ali, I., Gupta, N.·2012·2012 IEEE International Conference on Power System Technology (POWERCON)

Abstract

Advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) security has become a challenging issue now days because of its integration with the external networks, remote system, and internet world. Today's metering infrastructure employs computer based monitoring and control operations to enable application of one network to exchange data with other application of different network. Communication protocol, network topologies, and computerization plays crucial roles to make the metering infrastructure advanced and further make a grid smarter. On the other hand, cyber attacks already associated with such computer networks and communication protocol can easily affect the communication of AMI applications. Therefore, from trespasser point of view, in this paper, we explore the various possible types of undesirable security threats followed by desirable security attributes required for the AMI. The paper further describes and implements a signature based station-to-station protocol for exchanging the secret shared keys among the AMI applications to get rid from undesirable security threats.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/powercon.2012.6401418

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A malicious node in a wireless mesh network can tamper with messages sensitive to flooding attacks, resulting in saturation of the AMI network; DoS attack comes from malicious node(s) sending excessive unnecessary data packets and issuing excessive requests, congesting the mesh network and increasing latency.

    “A malicious node in a wireless mesh network can tamper with messages that are sensitive to flooding attacks, resulting in a saturation of the AMI network. The DoS attack will come from a malicious node or nodes in the mesh network, sending excessive unnecessary data packets throughout the network and issuing excessive requests for communication. This traffic congests the mesh network and forms the”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. lenzini, 2009, Trust, security and privacy for advanced metering infrastructure, Technical Report
  2. 2010, Google Powermeter Web

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Thomas, M. S., Ali, I., & Gupta, N.
Affiliations
Jamia Millia Islamia (IN)
Venue
2012 IEEE International Conference on Power System Technology (POWERCON)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2012-10
Pages
1-7
OpenAlex
W2537682469
Cited by
13
References
20
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
3.08
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Power System Technology (POWERCON) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Security in Wireless Sensor Networks
Keywords
advanced metering infrastructure, secret key exchange, digital signatures, cyberattacks, security threats, smart grid security, protocol security, network security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review