The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Autonomous helicopter control using reinforcement learning policy search methods
Open accessAbstract
Many control problems in the robotics field can be cast as partially observed Markovian decision problems (POMDPs), an optimal control formalism. Finding optimal solutions to such problems in general, however is known to be intractable. It has often been observed that in practice, simple structured controllers suffice for good sub-optimal control, and recent research in the artificial intelligence community has focused on policy search methods as techniques for finding sub-optimal controllers when such structured controllers do exist. Traditional model-based reinforcement learning algorithms make a certainty equivalence assumption on their learned models and calculate optimal policies for a maximum-likelihood Markovian model. We consider algorithms that evaluate and synthesize controllers under distributions of Markovian models. Previous work has demonstrated that algorithms that maximize mean reward with respect to model uncertainty leads to safer and more robust controllers. We consider briefly other performance criterion that emphasize robustness and exploration in the search for controllers, and note the relation with experiment design and active learning. To validate the power of the approach on a robotic application we demonstrate the presented learning control algorithm by flying an autonomous helicopter. We show that the controller learned is robust and delivers good performance in this real-world domain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.1998.712192 · Cited by 27,225
Bellman, R. E. (2010) · doi:10.1515/9781400835386 · Cited by 14,588
Cited by
A survey of robot learning from demonstration
Argall, B. D., Chernova, S., Veloso, M., & Browning, B. (2009) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2008.10.024 · Cited by 3,227
Reinforcement learning in robotics: A survey
Kober, J., Bagnell, J. A., & Peters, J. (2013) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364913495721 · Cited by 3,160
Self-citationOffline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problems
Levine, S., Kumar, A., Tucker, G., & Fu, J. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.01643 · Cited by 824
Miikkulainen, R., Liang, J., Meyerson, E., Rawal, A., Fink, D., Francon, O., Raju, B., Shahrzad, H., Navruzyan, A., Duffy, N., et al. (2019) · Artificial Intelligence in the Age of Neural Networks and Brain Computing · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-815480-9.00015-3 · Cited by 760
Autonomous Inverted Helicopter Flight via Reinforcement Learning
Ng, A. Y., Coates, A., Diel, M., Ganapathi, V., Schulte, J., Tse, B., Berger, E., & Liang, E. (2006) · Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics · doi:10.1007/11552246_35 · Cited by 553
Metadata
- Authors
- Bagnell, J. A., & Schneider, J. G.
- Venue
- Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2002-11-13
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 1615-1620
- ISSN
- 1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2130105540
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.07
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Autonomous helicopter control using reinforcement learning policy search methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/robot.2001.932842
- The paper
- Bagnell, J. A., & Schneider, J. G. (2002). Autonomous helicopter control using reinforcement learning policy search methods. Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164). https://doi.org/10.1109/robot.2001.932842
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.