The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The role of expressiveness and attention in human-robot interaction
Abstract
This paper presents the results of an experiment in human-robot social interaction. Its purpose was to measure the impact of certain features and behaviors on people's willingness to engage in a short interaction with a robot. The behaviors tested were the ability to convey expression with a humanoid face and the ability to indicate attention by turning towards the person that the robot is addressing. We hypothesized that these features were minimal requirements for effective social interaction between a human and a robot. We will discuss the results of the experiment and their implications for the design of socially interactive robots.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A survey of socially interactive robots
Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K. (2003) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/s0921-8890(02)00372-x · Cited by 3,162
Self-citationEmotion and sociable humanoid robots
Breazeal, C. (2003) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00018-1 · Cited by 1,279
Wang, B., Rau, P.-L. P., & Yuan, T. (2023) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2022.2072768 · Cited by 1,036
What Makes a Good Conversation?: Challenges in Designing Truly Conversational Agents
Clark, L., Pantidi, N., Cooney, O., Doyle, P., Garaialde, D., Edwards, J., Spillane, B., Gilmartin, E., Murad, C., Munteanu, C., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300705 · Cited by 461
Expressing thought: Improving robot readability with animation principles
Takayama, L., Dooley, D., & Ju, W. (2011) · Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction · doi:10.1145/1957656.1957674 · Cited by 289
The State of Speech in HCI: Trends, Themes and Challenges
Clark, L., Doyle, P., Garaialde, D., Gilmartin, E., Schlögl, S., Edlund, J., Aylett, M., Cabral, J., Munteanu, C., Edwards, J., et al. (2019) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1093/iwc/iwz016 · Cited by 193
Mapping Perceptions of Humanness in Intelligent Personal Assistant Interaction
Doyle, P. R., Edwards, J., Dumbleton, O., Clark, L., & Cowan, B. R. (2019) · Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services · doi:10.1145/3338286.3340116 · Cited by 100
The Impact of Personalisation on Human-Robot Interaction in Learning Scenarios
Churamani, N., Anton, P., Brügger, M., Fließwasser, E., Hummel, T., Mayer, J., Mustafa, W., Ng, H. G., Nguyen, T. L. C., Nguyen, Q., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction · doi:10.1145/3125739.3125756 · Cited by 67
Emotive response to a hybrid-face robot and translation to consumer social robots
Wairagkar, M., Lima, M. R., Bazo, D., Craig, R., Weissbart, H., Etoundi, A. C., Reichenbach, T., Iyengar, P., Vaswani, S., James, C., et al. (2022) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2021.3097592 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Bruce, A., Nourbakhsh, I., & Simmons, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2003-06-25
- Volume
- 4
- Pages
- 4138-4142
- ISSN
- 1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160434794
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.05
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
