Cited by 20Opportunistic and Delay-Tolerant NetworksNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G

Smart Congestion Control for Delay- and Disruption Tolerant Networks

Silva, Aloizio P., Obraczka, Katia, Burleigh, Scott, Hirata, Celso M.·2016·2016 13th Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON)

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a novel congestion control framework for delay- and disruption tolerant networks (DTNs). The proposed framework, called Smart-DTN-CC, adjusts its operation automatically as a function of the dynamics of the underlying net- work. It employs reinforcement learning, a machine learning technique known to be well suited to problems in which the environment, in this case the network, plays a crucial role; yet, no prior knowledge about the target environment can be assumed, i.e., the only way to acquire information about the environment is to interact with it through continuous online learning. Smart-DTN-CC nodes get input from the environment (e.g., its buffer occupancy, set of neighbors, etc), and, based on that information, choose an action to take from a set of possible actions. Depending on an action's effectiveness in controlling congestion, it will be given a reward. Smart-DTN-CC's goal is to maximize the over- all reward which translates to minimizing congestion. To our knowledge, Smart-DTN-CC is the first DTN congestion control framework that has the ability to automatically and continuously adapt to the dynamics of the target environment. As demonstrated by our experimental evaluation, Smart-DTN- CC is able to consistently outperform existing DTN congestion control mechanisms under a wide range of network conditions and characteristics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/sahcn.2016.7733018

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Silva, A. P., Obraczka, K., Burleigh, S., & Hirata, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
2016 13th Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-06
Pages
1-9
OpenAlex
W2548859221
Cited by
20
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.13
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Opportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Traffic and Congestion Control
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
Keywords
congestion control, delay tolerant networks, reinforcement learning, adaptive network control, online learning, buffer occupancy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review