Cited by 1Online Learning and AnalyticsEngineering Education and Curriculum DevelopmentData Mining and Machine Learning Applications

“Application of machine learning to curriculum design analysis,”

Rawatlal, Randhir·2017·2017 Computing Conference

Abstract

Curriculum re-design typically involves a review of the relative strengths and weaknesses of an academic programme particularly with respect to the suitability pre- and co-requisites of courses. Courses that are identified as requisite sometimes provide little conceptual scaffolding, with the result being a curriculum design whose sequence does not correlate with the progression routes adopted by students. An application of Identification Trees is proposed here to determine the sensitivity of a course to the anticipated requisites independently of human bias and based entirely on the available data. Among the various Machine Learning approaches considered, Identification Trees is one of the few which generates results can be interpreted in terms of a priority of courses that determine course outcome sensitivity to requisites. A secondary approach is also through cross-correlation using the Pearson r-coefficient. Both approaches were applied to academic programmes in the School of Engineering and a predictive accuracy of 72% was demonstrated even at long correlation capacity of 32%. Overall, the method gave reliable results and is hereby proposed as a potentially useful analysis technique in the design of curricula.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/sai.2017.8252234

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rawatlal, R.
Affiliations
University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Corresponding author
Rawatlal, Randhir
Venue
2017 Computing Conference
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-07
Volume
12
Pages
1143-1151
OpenAlex
W2782775794
Cited by
1
References
6
Citations by year
2023: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
2017 Computing Conference (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
curriculum development, course prerequisites, Pearson correlation, course sequencing, engineering education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review