“Application of machine learning to curriculum design analysis,”
Abstract
Curriculum re-design typically involves a review of the relative strengths and weaknesses of an academic programme particularly with respect to the suitability pre- and co-requisites of courses. Courses that are identified as requisite sometimes provide little conceptual scaffolding, with the result being a curriculum design whose sequence does not correlate with the progression routes adopted by students. An application of Identification Trees is proposed here to determine the sensitivity of a course to the anticipated requisites independently of human bias and based entirely on the available data. Among the various Machine Learning approaches considered, Identification Trees is one of the few which generates results can be interpreted in terms of a priority of courses that determine course outcome sensitivity to requisites. A secondary approach is also through cross-correlation using the Pearson r-coefficient. Both approaches were applied to academic programmes in the School of Engineering and a predictive accuracy of 72% was demonstrated even at long correlation capacity of 32%. Overall, the method gave reliable results and is hereby proposed as a potentially useful analysis technique in the design of curricula.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the last decade, several works have used AI-informed curriculum design approaches.
“however the last decade saw several works using AI-informed curriculum design approaches.”
From Proactive and reactive engagement of artificial intelligence methods for education: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Rawatlal, 2017
Cites
VII. Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents
Pearson, K. (1895) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London · doi:10.1098/rspl.1895.0041 · Cited by 3,473 · see citing works
Significance and Challenges of Big Data Research
Jin, X., Wah, B. W.-S., Cheng, X., & Wang, Y. (2015) · Big Data Research · doi:10.1016/j.bdr.2015.01.006 · Cited by 779 · see citing works
Cur r iculum Resear ch : Tow ar d a Fr amew or k for "Resear ch -based Cur r icula"
Clements, D. H. (2007) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.2307/30034927 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Reflections on Learning Progressions
Shavelson, R. J., & Kurpius, A. (2012) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6091-824-7_2 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
A Relational Approach to Curriculum Design
Kessels, J. (1999) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4255-7_5 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
A systematic and relational approach to obtaining curriculum consistency in corporate education
Kessels, J., & Plomp, T. (1999) · Journal of Curriculum Studies · doi:10.1080/002202799182945 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Proactive and reactive engagement of artificial intelligence methods for education: a review
Mallik, S., & Gangopadhyay, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2023.1151391 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rawatlal, R.
- Affiliations
- University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Rawatlal, Randhir
- ORCID
- Rawatlal, Randhir
- Venue
- 2017 Computing Conference
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 12
- Pages
- 1143-1151
- OpenAlex
- W2782775794
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- 2017 Computing Conference (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- curriculum development, course prerequisites, Pearson correlation, course sequencing, engineering education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review