The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MVP Explained: A Systematic Mapping Study on the Definitions of Minimal Viable Product
Abstract
Context: One of the most important steps of the Lean Startup methodology is the definition of Minimum Viable Product (MVP), needed to start the learning process by integrating the early adopters' feedbacks as soon as possible. Objective: This study aims at identifying the common definitions of MVP proposed and the key factors identified to help entrepreneurs efficiently define their MVP, reducing errors due to unconsidered unknown factors. Method: We identified the MVP definitions and key factors by means of a systematic mapping study, defining the research questions and the protocol to be used. We selected the bibliographic sources, the keywords, and the selection criteria for searching the relevant papers. Results: We found 97 articles and, through inclusion and exclusion criteria, removed 75 articles, which reduced the total to 22 at the end of the process. The results are a classification schema for characterizing the definition of Minimum Viable Product in Lean Startups and a set of common key factors identified in the MVP definitions. Conclusion: The identified key factors are related to technical characteristics of the product as well as market and customer aspects. We found a positive improvement of the state of the art of MVP and the definition of Minimum.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only one related literature review of prototyping concerning the definition of MVP exists.
“and only one related literature review of prototyping concerning the definition of MVP (Lenarduzzi et al. 2016).”
From An empirically based model of software prototyping: a mapping study and a multi-case study (2023) · cites this paper as Lenarduzzi et al. 2016
There is a lack of theory on prototyping.
“Even so, there is a lack of theory on prototyping.”
From An empirically based model of software prototyping: a mapping study and a multi-case study (2023) · cites this paper as Lenarduzzi et al. 2016
Citations
Cites
Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering
Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., & Mattsson, M. (2008) · Electronic Workshops in Computing · doi:10.14236/ewic/ease2008.8 · Cited by 3,239 · cited 1×
“In this step of the systematic mapping process, we defined the bibliographic sources, the keywords used, and the selection criteria for identifying the relevant papers.”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital innovation ecosystems in agri-food: design principles and organizational framework
Wolfert, S., Verdouw, C., van Wassenaer, L., Dolfsma, W., & Klerkx, L. (2023) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103558 · Cited by 137
An empirically based model of software prototyping: a mapping study and a multi-case study
Bjarnason, E., Lang, F., & Mjöberg, A. (2023) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-023-10331-w · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Lenarduzzi, V., & Taibi, D.
- Affiliations
- Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT)
- Venue
- 2016 42th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-08
- Pages
- 112-119
- OpenAlex
- W2539177311
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 36.93
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Keywords
- minimum viable product, lean startup, product development, classification schema
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review