The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient authentication and signing of multicast streams over lossy channels
Abstract
Multicast stream authentication and signing is an important and challenging problem. Applications include the continuous authentication of radio and TV Internet broadcasts, and authenticated data distribution by satellite. The main challenges are fourfold. First, authenticity must be guaranteed even when only the sender of the data is trusted. Second, the scheme needs to scale to potentially millions of receivers. Third, streamed media distribution can have high packet loss. Finally the system needs to be efficient to support fast packet rates. We propose two efficient schemes, TESLA and EMSS, for secure lossy multicast streams. TESLA (Timed Efficient Stream Loss-tolerant Authentication), offers sender authentication, strong loss robustness, high scalability and minimal overhead at the cost of loose initial time synchronization and slightly delayed authentication. EMSS (Efficient Multi-chained Stream Signature), provides nonrepudiation of origin, high loss resistance, and low overhead, at the cost of slightly delayed verification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems
Rivest, R. L., Shamir, A., & Adleman, L. (1978) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359340.359342 · Cited by 13,462
Protocols for Public Key Cryptosystems
Merkle, R. C. (1980) · 1980 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.1980.10006 · Cited by 1,418
Cited by
Packet leashes: a defense against wormhole attacks in wireless networks
Hu, Y.-C., Perrig, A., & Johnson, D. B. (2004) · IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428) · doi:10.1109/infcom.2003.1209219 · Cited by 1,513
Self-citationAriadne: a secure on-demand routing protocol for ad hoc networks
Hu, Y.-C., Perrig, A., & Johnson, D. B. (2002) · Proceedings of the 8th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking · doi:10.1145/570645.570648 · Cited by 1,298
Self-citationSecurity of the Internet of Things: perspectives and challenges
Jing, Q., Vasilakos, A. V., Wan, J., Lu, J., & Qiu, D. (2014) · Wireless Networks · doi:10.1007/s11276-014-0761-7 · Cited by 1,245
Cyber security in the Smart Grid: Survey and challenges
Wang, W., & Lu, Z. (2013) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2012.12.017 · Cited by 1,123
LEAP: efficient security mechanisms for large-scale distributed sensor networks
Zhu, S., Setia, S., & Jajodia, S. (2003) · Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/948109.948120 · Cited by 1,117
Metadata
- Authors
- Perrig, A., Canetti, R., Tygar, J. D., & Song, D.
- Venue
- Proceeding 2000 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. S&P 2000
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2002-11-07
- Pages
- 56-73
- OpenAlex
- W2130459259
- Cited by
- 946
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 49.48
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
