The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Collaborative filtering with privacy
Abstract
Server-based collaborative filtering systems have been very successful in e-commerce and in direct recommendation applications. In future, they have many potential applications in ubiquitous computing settings. But today's schemes have problems such as loss of privacy, favoring retail monopolies, and with hampering diffusion of innovations. We propose an alternative model in which users control all of their log data. We describe an algorithm whereby a community of users can compute a public "aggregate" of their data that does not expose individual users' data. The aggregate allows personalized recommendations to be computed by members of the community, or by outsiders. The numerical algorithm is fast, robust and accurate. Our method reduces the collaborative filtering task to an iterative calculation of the aggregate requiring only addition of vectors of user data. Then we use homomorphic encryption to allow sums of encrypted vectors to be computed and decrypted without exposing individual data. We give verification schemes for all parties in the computation. Our system can be implemented with untrusted servers, or with additional infrastructure, as a fully peer-to-peer (P2P) system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Introduction to Recommender Systems Handbook
Ricci, F., Rokach, L., & Shapira, B. (2011) · Recommender Systems Handbook · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_1 · Cited by 2,378
Information Privacy Research: an Interdisciplinary Review1
Smith, H. J., Dinev, T., & Xu, H. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41409970 · Cited by 2,013
"You Might Also Like:" Privacy Risks of Collaborative Filtering
Calandrino, J. A., Kilzer, A., Narayanan, A., Felten, E. W., & Shmatikov, V. (2011) · 2011 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.2011.40 · Cited by 311
Privacy-preserving collaborative recommendations based on random perturbations
Polatidis, N., Georgiadis, C. K., Pimenidis, E., & Mouratidis, H. (2017) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.11.018 · Cited by 80
Kim, J., Koo, D., Kim, Y., Yoon, H., Shin, J., & Kim, S. (2018) · ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security · doi:10.1145/3212509 · Cited by 74
Wang, Y., Gao, M., Ran, X., Ma, J., & Zhang, L. Y. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119457 · Cited by 42
Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Filtering Using Fully Homomorphic Encryption
Jumonji, S., Sakai, K., Sun, M.-T., & Ku, W.-S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2021.3115776 · Cited by 19
Can user privacy and recommendation performance be preserved simultaneously?
Feng, T., Guo, Y., & Chen, Y. (2015) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2015.06.013 · Cited by 9
CryptoRec: Novel Collaborative Filtering Recommender Made Privacy-Preserving Easy
Wang, J., Jin, C., Tang, Q., Liu, Z., & Aung, K. M. M. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2021.3065752 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Canny, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings 2002 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2005-08-24
- Pages
- 45-57
- ISSN
- 1081-6011 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169101582
- Cited by
- 442
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.56
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.