The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CryptoRec: Novel Collaborative Filtering Recommender Made Privacy-Preserving Easy
Abstract
With the explosive growth of user data, recommenders have become increasingly complicated. State-of-the-art algorithms often have high computational complexity and heavily use non-linear transformations. This fact makes the privacy-preserving problem more challenging, despite the significant advances in cryptography. To alleviate this problem, we propose a privacy-friendly recommender, CryptoRec. It only relies on additions and multiplications, which are efficiently supported by most cryptographic primitives. Different from others, in CryptoRec, the parameter space only contains item features (user features can be directly computed from the item features). This property allows CryptoRec to, (1) naturally achieve transferability if two datasets share the same item entries, which can benefit differential privacy protection; (2) directly estimate the preference of new users whose data is not included in the training set, drastically improving recommendation efficiency. We first evaluate CryptoRec on three real-world datasets. The evaluation results show that the accuracy is competitive with state-of-the-art. Then, we build differential privacy into CryptoRec and leverage its transferability property to reduce the overall privacy loss. Lastly, we demonstrate the simplicity and efficiency of using CryptoRec to construct secure recommendation protocols based on homomorphic encryption schemes. Our results show that CryptoRec outperforms existing solutions in terms of both accuracy a…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Additionally, users' feedback data is closely linked to their private attributes like gender and age, which also requires protection from inference attacks [121].”
From A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research (2024) · cites this paper as [121]
In the citing paper
“Wang et al. [121] also proposed a hybrid privacy preservation approach by considering three problems that are user attribute inference, data leakage from recommendation lists, and privacy breach from knowledge sharing between datasets with the same items profiles.”
From A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research (2024) · cites this paper as [121]
Citations
Cites
SecureML: A System for Scalable Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning
Mohassel, P., & Zhang, Y. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2017.12 · Cited by 1,936
Prechelt, L. (1998) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-49430-8_3 · Cited by 1,649
The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networks
Frankle, J., & Carbin, M. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.03635 · Cited by 1,529
Research works printed but not linked: 55
- 10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_4 · DOI
- 10.1109/MC.2009.263 · DOI
- 10.1145/3285029 · DOI
- 10.1109/4236.968832 · DOI
- Calandrino, “you might also like:, 231
- 10.1109/SECPRI.2002.1004361 · DOI
- 10.1109/SP.2015.30 · DOI
- 10.1145/1557019.1557090 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-70694-8_15 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2508859.2516751 · DOI
- 10.1145/2897845.2897875 · DOI
- 10.1561/0400000042 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-3-642-38348-9_3 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-70278-0_1 · DOI
- Zhu, Poission subsampled rényi differential privacy, 7634
- Gilad-Bachrach, Cryptonets: Applying neural networks to encrypted data with high throughput and accuracy, 201
- 10.1145/3133956.3134056 · DOI
- 10.1145/3133956.3134061 · DOI
- 10.1109/CSF.2017.11 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2976749.2978318 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/3-540-48910-x_16 · DOI · Paper page
- Krizhevsky, Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks, 1097
- 10.1007/978-3-642-35289-8_25 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-540-79228-4_1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TKDE.2005.99 · DOI
- 10.24963/ijcai.2019/668 · DOI
- 10.1145/1536414.1536440 · DOI · Paper page
- 2010, Grouplens Moivelens
- 2010, R4-Yahoo! Movies
- 2010, Netflix Prize Dataset
- 10.1155/2009/421425 · DOI
- 10.1145/2740908.2742726 · DOI
- 10.1007/11681878_14 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1553374.1553454 · DOI
- 10.1609/aaai.v24i1.7578 · DOI
- Geumlek, Renyi differential privacy mechanisms for posterior sampling, 5289
- 10.1145/2792838.2800173 · DOI
- 10.1145/2792838.2800191 · DOI
- 10.1137/090756090 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-3-642-11799-2_26 · DOI
- 2018, Python-Paillier
- Bethencourt, 2010, Libpaillier
- Fan, 2012, Somewhat practical fully homomorphic encryption, IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, 2012
- 10.1007/978-3-662-39778-7_10 · DOI
- 10.1145/2508859.2516751 · DOI
- Huang, Faster secure two-party computation using garbled circuits, 331
- 10.1145/3109859.3109881 · DOI
- 10.24963/ijcai.2018/547 · DOI
- 10.1145/3195970.3196023 · DOI
- Juvekar, GAZELLE: A low latency framework for secure neural network inference, 1651
- 10.1145/1557019.1557090 · DOI
- 10.1145/2792838.2800173 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11257-016-9177-7 · DOI
- 10.1145/2810103.2813687 · DOI · Paper page
- Wang, Privacy for free: Posterior sampling and stochastic gradient monte carlo, 2493
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Roy, F., Ding, X., Choo, K. K. R., & Zhou, P. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.12651 · Cited by 7
“• There is an inherent trade-off between privacy and utility • Properly calibrating the amount of noise to add for privacy • Sophisticated adversaries can use background knowledge and • Anonymization techniques, such as k-anonymity can be”
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, J., Jin, C., Tang, Q., Liu, Z., & Aung, K. M. M.
- Affiliations
- International Electronics & Engineering, Bissen, Luxembourg
- Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
- Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LU)
- Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
- Published
- 2022-07-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2622-2634
- ISSN
- 1545-5971 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0018
- 2160-9209
- OpenAlex
- W3138567363
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Agency for Science, Technology and Research
- RIE2020 Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
- Keywords
- collaborative filtering, privacy-preserving recommendation, differential privacy, homomorphic encryption, transferability, item characteristics, user preference prediction, secure multi-party computation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CryptoRec: Novel Collaborative Filtering Recommender Made Privacy-Preserving Easy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tdsc.2021.3065752
- The paper
- Wang, J., Jin, C., Tang, Q., Liu, Z., & Aung, K. M. M. (2022). CryptoRec: Novel Collaborative Filtering Recommender Made Privacy-Preserving Easy. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tdsc.2021.3065752