The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SWATT: software-based attestation for embedded devices
Abstract
We expect a future where we are surrounded by embedded devices, ranging from Java-enabled cell phones to sensor networks and smart appliances. An adversary can compromise our privacy and safety by maliciously modifying the memory contents of these embedded devices. In this paper, we propose a softWare-based attestation technique (SWATT) to verify the memory contents of embedded devices and establish the absence of malicious changes to the memory contents. SWATT does not need physical access to the device's memory, yet provides memory content attestation similar to TCG or NGSCB without requiring secure hardware. SWATT can detect any change in memory contents with high probability, thus detecting viruses, unexpected configuration settings, and Trojan Horses. To circumvent SWATT, we expect that an attacker needs to change the hardware to hide memory content changes. We present an implementation of SWATT in off-the-shelf sensor network devices, which enables us to verify the contents of the program memory even while the sensor node is running.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A secure and reliable bootstrap architecture
Arbaugh, W. A., Farber, D. J., & Smith, J. M. (2002) · Proceedings. 1997 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (Cat. No.97CB36097) · doi:10.1109/secpri.1997.601317 · Cited by 562
Cited by
Lin, J., Yu, W., Zhang, N., Yang, X., Zhang, H., & Zhao, W. (2017) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2017.2683200 · Cited by 2,793
Security and privacy challenges in industrial internet of things
Sadeghi, A.-R., Wachsmann, C., & Waidner, M. (2015) · Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Design Automation Conference · doi:10.1145/2744769.2747942 · Cited by 916
Wireless Sensor Network Security: A Survey
Walters, J. P., Liang, Z., Shi, W., & Chaudhary, V. (2007) · Security in Distributed, Grid, Mobile, and Pervasive Computing · doi:10.1201/9780849379253-20 · Cited by 389
Iqbal, W., Abbas, H., Daneshmand, M., Rauf, B., & Bangash, Y. A. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.2997651 · Cited by 356
A Survey on Wireless Sensor Network Security
Sen, J. (2010) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1011.1529 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Seshadri, A., Perrig, A., van Doorn, L., & Khosla, P.
- Venue
- IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2004. Proceedings. 2004
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2004-06-10
- Pages
- 272-282
- ISSN
- 1081-6011 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099613071
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.35
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SWATT: software-based attestation for embedded devices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/secpri.2004.1301329
- The paper
- Seshadri, A., Perrig, A., van Doorn, L., & Khosla, P. (2004). SWATT: software-based attestation for embedded devices. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2004. Proceedings. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1109/secpri.2004.1301329
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.