The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The strength of weak learnability
Abstract
The problem of improving the accuracy of a hypothesis output by a learning algorithm in the distribution-free learning model is considered. A concept class is learnable (or strongly learnable) if, given access to a source of examples from the unknown concept, the learner with high probability is able to output a hypothesis that is correct on all but an arbitrarily small fraction of the instances. The concept class is weakly learnable if the learner can produce a hypothesis that forms only slightly better than random guessing. It is shown that these two notions of learnability are equivalent. An explicit method is described for directly converting a weak learning algorithm into one that achieves arbitrarily high accuracy. This construction may have practical applications as a tool for efficiently converting a mediocre learning algorithm into one that performs extremely well. In addition, the construction has some interesting theoretical consequences.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Valiant, L. G. (1984) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1968.1972 · Cited by 3,279
Cited by
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570
Popular Ensemble Methods: An Empirical Study
Opitz, D., & Maclin, R. (1999) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.614 · Cited by 2,953
Solving Multiclass Learning Problems via Error-Correcting Output Codes
Dietterich, T. G., & Bakiri, G. (1995) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.105 · Cited by 2,739
An Empirical Comparison of Voting Classification Algorithms: Bagging, Boosting, and Variants
Bauer, E., & Kohavi, R. (1999) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007515423169 · Cited by 2,638
Ensembles of Deep LSTM Learners for Activity Recognition using Wearables
Guan, Y., & Plötz, T. (2017) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3090076 · Cited by 511
Metadata
- Authors
- Schapire, R. E.
- Venue
- 30th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 1989
- Pages
- 28-33
- ISSN
- 0272-5428 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046995465
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The strength of weak learnability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/sfcs.1989.63451
- The paper
- Schapire, R. E. (1989). The strength of weak learnability. 30th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1109/sfcs.1989.63451
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.