The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Space-efficient static trees and graphs
Abstract
Data structures that represent static unlabeled trees and planar graphs are developed. The structures are more space efficient than conventional pointer-based representations, but (to within a constant factor) they are just as time efficient for traversal operations. For trees, the data structures described are asymptotically optimal: there is no other structure that encodes n-node trees with fewer bits per node, as N grows without bound. For planar graphs (and for all graphs of bounded page number), the data structure described uses linear space: it is within a constant factor of the most succinct representation.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Navarro, G., & Mäkinen, V. (2007) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1216370.1216372 · Cited by 735
Compressed representations of sequences and full-text indexes
Ferragina, P., Manzini, G., Mäkinen, V., & Navarro, G. (2007) · ACM Transactions on Algorithms · doi:10.1145/1240233.1240243 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Jacobson, G.
- Venue
- 30th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 1989
- Pages
- 549-554
- ISSN
- 0272-5428 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2149243190
- Cited by
- 634
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Space-efficient static trees and graphs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/sfcs.1989.63533
- The paper
- Jacobson, G. (1989). Space-efficient static trees and graphs. 30th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1109/sfcs.1989.63533
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
