Cited by 30Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

Development of Defect Classification Algorithm for POSCO Rolling Strip Surface Inspection System

Choi, Keesug, Koo, Kyungmo, Lee, Jin·2006·2006 SICE-ICASE International Joint Conference

Abstract

Surface inspection system (SIS) is an integrated hardware-software system which automatically inspects the surface of the steel strip. It is equipped with several cameras and illumination over and under the steel strip roll and automatically detects and classifies defects on the surface. The performance of the inspection algorithm plays an important role in not only quality assurance of the rolled steel product, but also improvement of the strip production process control. Current implementation of POSCO SIS has good ability to detect defects, however, classification performance is not satisfactory. In this paper, we introduce POSCO SIS and suggest a new defect classification algorithm which is based on support vector machine technique. The suggested classification algorithm shows good classification ability and generalization performance

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/sice.2006.314681

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Six defect types from cold strips were correctly classified with 87% to 94% accuracy.

    “Six defect types from cold strips were correctly classified with 87% to 94% accuracy.”

    From Review of vision-based steel surface inspection systems (2014) · cites this paper as [83]

  • Multiclass problem solution using SVM has been reported in [25,70,81,83-85].

    “Multiclass problem solution using SVM has been reported in [25,70,81,83-85].”

    From Review of vision-based steel surface inspection systems (2014) · cites this paper as [83]

  • Gaussian radial basis function (RBF) kernel function was found to be routinely used for steel surface defect classification.

    “Gaussian radial basis function (RBF) kernel function was found to be routinely used for steel surface defect classification [2,83,85].”

    From Review of vision-based steel surface inspection systems (2014) · cites this paper as [83]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Choi, K., Koo, K., & Lee, J.
Affiliations
Pohang University of Science and Technology (KR)
Venue
2006 SICE-ICASE International Joint Conference
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2006
Pages
2499-2502
OpenAlex
W2029669066
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.84
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SICE-ICASE International Joint Conference (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Keywords
defect classification, steel strip, rolling mill, support vector machine, defect detection, image-based inspection, quality assurance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review