The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Predictive models for severe sepsis in adult ICU patients
Abstract
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients have significant morbidity and mortality, often from complications that arise during the hospital stay. Severe sepsis is one of the leading causes of death among these patients. Predictive models have the potential to allow for earlier detection of severe sepsis and ultimately earlier intervention. However, current methods for identifying and predicting severe sepsis are biased and inadequate. The goal of this work is to identify a new framework for the prediction of severe sepsis and identify early predictors utilizing clinical laboratory values and vital signs collected in adult ICU patients. We explore models with logistic regression (LR), support vector machines (SVM), and logistic model trees (LMT) utilizing vital signs, laboratory values, or a combination of vital and laboratory values. When applied to a retrospective cohort of ICU patients, the SVM model using laboratory and vital signs as predictors identified 339 (65%) of the 3,446 patients as developing severe sepsis correctly. Based on this new framework and developed models, we provide a recommendation for the use in clinical decision support in ICU and non-ICU environments.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Numerous models were tested on the freely accessible MIMIC database.
“numerous models were tested on the freely accessible MIMIC database [27, 33, 52–59]”
From Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (2020) · cites this paper as [58]
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 31 · Cited by 23
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- 10.1097/00003246-199804000-00032 · DOI
- 10.1016/0021-9681(84)90029-8 · DOI
- 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346171 · DOI
- 10.1097/00003246-198108000-00008 · DOI
- 10.1378/chest.100.6.1619 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.surg.2013.05.025 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0933-3657(98)00047-5 · DOI
- 10.1097/00003246-198510000-00009 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10877-013-9530-x · DOI
- 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001854 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.CCM.0000060867.17556.A0 · DOI
- 10.1186/2110-5820-3-6 · DOI
- kraut, 2014, Lactic Acidosis, New England Journal of Medicine, 371, 2309, 10.1056/NEJMra1309483 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.054 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.8.061505.095842 · DOI
- 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001815 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMoa1415236 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0011-3840(97)80011-1 · DOI
- 10.1164/rccm.200208-785OC · DOI
- 10.1097/01.CCM.0000094223.92746.56 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4419-5913-3_9 · DOI
- 10.1088/0967-3334/31/6/004 · DOI
- 0, MIMIC II Database
- 10.1002/jhm.530 · DOI
- gareth, 2013, An Introduction to Statistical Learning with Applications in R
Metadata
- Authors
- Guillén, J., Liu, J., Furr, M., Wang, T., Strong, S., Moore, C. C., Flower, A., & Barnes, L. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Venue
- 2015 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2015-04-24
- Pages
- 182-187
- OpenAlex
- W1488990065
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 18.43
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Northrop Grumman
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- severe sepsis, sepsis prediction, intensive care unit patients, early detection, laboratory parameters, vital signs, support vector machine, logistic model tree, logistic regression, clinical decision support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review