Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep learning detecting fraud in credit card transactions

Roy, Abhimanyu, Sun, Jingyi, Mahoney, Robert, Alonzi, Loreto, Adams, Stephen, Beling, Peter·2018·2018 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)

Abstract

Credit card fraud resulted in the loss of $3 billion to North American financial institutions in 2017. The rise of digital payments systems such as Apple Pay, Android Pay, and Venmo has meant that loss due to fraudulent activity is expected to increase. Deep Learning presents a promising solution to the problem of credit card fraud detection by enabling institutions to make optimal use of their historic customer data as well as real-time transaction details that are recorded at the time of the transaction. In 2017, a study found that a Deep Learning approach provided comparable results to prevailing fraud detection methods such as Gradient Boosted Trees and Logistic Regression. However, Deep Learning encompasses a number of topologies. Additionally, the various parameters used to construct the model (e.g. the number of neurons in the hidden layer of a neural network) also influence its results. In this paper, we evaluate a subsection of Deep Learning topologies — from the general artificial neural network to topologies with built-in time and memory components such as Long Short-term memory — and different parameters with regard to their efficacy in fraud detection on a dataset of nearly 80 million credit card transactions that have been pre-labeled as fraudulent and legitimate. We utilize a high performance, distributed cloud computing environment to navigate past common fraud detection problems such as class imbalance and scalability. Our analysis provides a comprehensive guide to sensitivity analysis of model parameters with regard to performance in fraud detection. We also present a framework for parameter tuning of Deep Learning topologies for credit card fraud detection to enable financial institutions to reduce losses by preventing fraudulent activity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/sieds.2018.8374722

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Metadata

Authors
Roy, A., Sun, J., Mahoney, R., Alonzi, L., Adams, S., & Beling, P.
Venue
2018 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-04
Pages
129-134
OpenAlex
W2805595195
Cited by
300
References
26
FWCI
10.92
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep learning detecting fraud in credit card transactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/sieds.2018.8374722
The paper
Roy, A., Sun, J., Mahoney, R., Alonzi, L., Adams, S., & Beling, P. (2018). Deep learning detecting fraud in credit card transactions. 2018 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS). https://doi.org/10.1109/sieds.2018.8374722

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.