The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep learning detecting fraud in credit card transactions
Abstract
Credit card fraud resulted in the loss of $3 billion to North American financial institutions in 2017. The rise of digital payments systems such as Apple Pay, Android Pay, and Venmo has meant that loss due to fraudulent activity is expected to increase. Deep Learning presents a promising solution to the problem of credit card fraud detection by enabling institutions to make optimal use of their historic customer data as well as real-time transaction details that are recorded at the time of the transaction. In 2017, a study found that a Deep Learning approach provided comparable results to prevailing fraud detection methods such as Gradient Boosted Trees and Logistic Regression. However, Deep Learning encompasses a number of topologies. Additionally, the various parameters used to construct the model (e.g. the number of neurons in the hidden layer of a neural network) also influence its results. In this paper, we evaluate a subsection of Deep Learning topologies — from the general artificial neural network to topologies with built-in time and memory components such as Long Short-term memory — and different parameters with regard to their efficacy in fraud detection on a dataset of nearly 80 million credit card transactions that have been pre-labeled as fraudulent and legitimate. We utilize a high performance, distributed cloud computing environment to navigate past common fraud detection problems such as class imbalance and scalability. Our analysis provides a comprehensive guide to sensitivity analysis of model parameters with regard to performance in fraud detection. We also present a framework for parameter tuning of Deep Learning topologies for credit card fraud detection to enable financial institutions to reduce losses by preventing fraudulent activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Self-citationDeep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570
Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling
Chung, J., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.3555 · Cited by 11,008
Hinton, G., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G., Mohamed, A.-R., Jaitly, N., Senior, A., Vanhoucke, V., Nguyen, P., Sainath, T., et al. (2012) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2012.2205597 · Cited by 10,260
Greff, K., Srivastava, R. K., Koutnik, J., Steunebrink, B. R., & Schmidhuber, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2016.2582924 · Cited by 6,955
A unified architecture for natural language processing: deep neural networks with multitask learning
Collobert, R., & Weston, J. (2008) · Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning - ICML '08 · doi:10.1145/1390156.1390177 · Cited by 5,058
Collaborative Deep Learning for Recommender Systems
Wang, H., Wang, N., & Yeung, D.-Y. (2015) · Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2783258.2783273 · Cited by 1,657
Ngai, E. W. T., Xiu, L., & Chau, D. C. K. (2009) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.02.021 · Cited by 1,266
Data mining for credit card fraud: a comparative study
Bhattacharyya, S., Jha, S., Tharakunnel, K., & Westland, J. C. (2011) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.08.008 · Cited by 1,108 · cited 1×
“used Support Vector Machine and Random Forest in detecting credit card detection and benchmarked the two methods against results obtained from Logistic Regression [21].”
MethodPredicting Parameters in Deep Learning
Denil, M., Shakibi, B., Dinh, L., Ranzato, M., & de Freitas, N. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1306.0543 · Cited by 853
Metadata
- Authors
- Roy, A., Sun, J., Mahoney, R., Alonzi, L., Adams, S., & Beling, P.
- Venue
- 2018 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-04
- Pages
- 129-134
- OpenAlex
- W2805595195
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 10.92
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep learning detecting fraud in credit card transactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/sieds.2018.8374722
- The paper
- Roy, A., Sun, J., Mahoney, R., Alonzi, L., Adams, S., & Beling, P. (2018). Deep learning detecting fraud in credit card transactions. 2018 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS). https://doi.org/10.1109/sieds.2018.8374722
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.