Cited by 35Technostress in Professional SettingsCyberloafing and Workplace BehaviorJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Context Sensitive Technologies and Electronic Employee Monitoring: a Meta-Analytic Review

Backhaus, Nils·2019·2019 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII)

Abstract

Digitized, interconnected work environments become increasingly popular. It is assumed that these system support employees in their daily routine and reduce mental demand and stress at work. However, context-aware systems entail the potential for comprehensive electronic workplace monitoring. This contribution reviews the influence of electronic monitoring on outcome variables, such as performance, psychological stress and strain, work motivation, satisfaction and behavior. 85 studies have been identified and prepared both qualitatively and metaanalytically. There were heterogeneous findings for employee performance. Mild adverse effects of monitoring on perceived stress, mental demand, job motivation and satisfaction, as well as organizational trust and perceived control could be found. Significant design recommendations were made in order to increase acceptance and avoid adverse monitoring effects. Most of the studies were based on cross-sectional correlative or quasi-experimental survey designs. As a result, ascertained design knowledge requires more longitudinal studies and systematic interventions of electronic monitoring in the field.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/sii.2019.8700354

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A comprehensive announcement and rational explanation about a monitoring system can prevent its negative impact on employees' sense of control.

    “For instance, the review by Backhaus (2019) revealed that a comprehensive announcement and rational explanation about a monitoring system can prevent its negative impact on employees' sense of control.”
  • A participatory approach to monitoring has been observed as an important feature to maintain employees' sense of control.

    “A participatory approach of monitoring (e.g.,”
  • The possibility for employees to use their judgement when something goes wrong and to switch off the system for a short period likely makes an important difference in their reaction to an algorithmic monitoring system.

    “the possibility for employees to use their judgement when something goes wrong and to switch off the system for a short period is likely to make an important difference in their reaction to an algorithmic monitoring system, as observed in the Backhaus (2019) meta-analytical review.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Backhaus, N.
Affiliations
Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (DE)
Corresponding author
Backhaus, Nils
Venue
2019 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-01
Pages
548-553
OpenAlex
W2943683027
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.56
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
context-aware systems, workplace monitoring, employee performance, psychological stress, employee motivation, job satisfaction, perceived control, organizational trust, technology acceptance, mental demand, employee behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review