Intent classification of short-text on social media,
Open accessAbstract
Social media platforms facilitate the emergence of citizen communities that discuss real-world events. Their content reflects a variety of intent ranging from social good (e.g., volunteering to help) to commercial interest (e.g., criticizing product features). Hence, mining intent from social data can aid in filtering social media to support organizations, such as an emergency management unit for resource planning. However, effective intent mining is inherently challenging due to ambiguity in interpretation, and sparsity of relevant behaviors in social data. In this paper, we address the problem of multiclass classification of intent with a use-case of social data generated during crisis events. Our novel method exploits a hybrid feature representation created by combining top-down processing using knowledge-guided patterns with bottom-up processing using a bag-of-tokens model. We employ pattern-set creation from a variety of knowledge sources including psycholinguistics to tackle the ambiguity challenge, social behavior about conversations to enrich context, and contrast patterns to tackle the sparsity challenge. Our results show a significant absolute gain up to 7% in the F1 score relative to a baseline using bottom-up processing alone, within the popular multiclass frameworks of One-vs-One and One-vs-All. Intent mining can help design efficient cooperative information systems between citizens and organizations for serving organizational information needs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Purohit et al. (2015) showed that it is possible to extract intent when the channel is text-only and restricted in length.
“the work by Purohit et al. (2015), who applied intent classification to short messages on Twitter, showed that it is possible to extract intent when the channel is text-only and restricted in length.”
From Modeling Feedback in Interaction With Conversational Agents—A Review (2022) · cites this paper as Purohit et al., 2015
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587 · see citing works
Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques
Witten, I. H., Frank, E., & Hall, M. A. (2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-19715-5 · Cited by 25,493 · see citing works
(1998) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7287.001.0001 · Cited by 4,849 · see citing works
English verb classes and alternations : a preliminaryinvestigation
Levin, B. (1993) · Americanae (AECID Library) · Cited by 2,430 · see citing works
Tenny, C. L. (1995) · Language · doi:10.2307/415968 · Cited by 2,310 · see citing works
Broder, A. (2002) · ACM SIGIR Forum · doi:10.1145/792550.792552 · Cited by 1,944 · see citing works
SPADE: An Efficient Algorithm for Mining Frequent Sequences
Zaki, M. J. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007652502315 · Cited by 1,864 · see citing works
Cognitive constraints on information flow
Chafe, W. (1987) · Typological studies in language · doi:10.1075/tsl.11.03cha · Cited by 1,371 · see citing works
Efficient mining of emerging patterns
Dong, G., & Li, J. (1999) · ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/312129.312191 · Cited by 1,023 · see citing works
Self-citationConceptual dependency: A theory of natural language understanding
Schank, R. C. (1972) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(72)90022-9 · Cited by 989 · see citing works
Baselines and Bigrams: Simple, Good Sentiment and Topic Classification
Wang, S., & Manning, C. D. (2012) · Cited by 957 · see citing works
Part-of-Speech Tagging for Twitter: Annotation, Features, and Experiments
Gimpel, K., Schneider, N., O'Connor, B., Das, D., Mills, D. P., Eisenstein, J., Heilman, M., Yogatama, D., Flanigan, J., & Smith, N. A. (2018) · Figshare · doi:10.1184/r1/6473609.v1 · Cited by 800 · see citing works
Galar, M., Fernández, A., Barrenechea, E., Bustince, H., & Herrera, F. (2011) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2011.01.017 · Cited by 787 · see citing works
The Folk Concept of Intentionality
Malle, B. F., & Knobe, J. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.1996.1314 · Cited by 742 · see citing works
Part-of-Speech Tagging for Twitter: Annotation, Features, and Experiments
Gimpel, K., Schneider, N., O'Connor, B., Das, D., Mills, D. S., Eisenstein, J., Heilman, M., Yogatama, D., Flanigan, J., & Smith, N. A. (2010) · doi:10.21236/ada547371 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Identifying comparative sentences in text documents
Jindal, N., & Liu, B. (2006) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/1148170.1148215 · Cited by 448 · see citing works
Emergency-relief coordination on social media: Automatically matching resource requests and offers
Purohit, H., Castillo, C., Díaz, F., Sheth, A., & Meier, P. P. (2013) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v19i1.4848 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Self-citationIdentifying Seekers and Suppliers in Social Media Communities to Support Crisis Coordination
Purohit, H., Hampton, A. J., Bhatt, S., Shalin, V. L., Sheth, A., & Flach, J. M. (2014) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-014-9209-y · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citationAid is Out There: Looking for Help from Tweets during a Large Scale Disaster
Varga, I., Sano, M., Torisawa, K., Hashimoto, C., Ohtake, K., Kawai, T., Oh, J., & Saeger, S. D. (2013) · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Identifying Intention Posts in Discussion Forums
Chen, Z., Liu, B., Hsu, M., Castellanos, M., & Ghosh, R. (2013) · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Wishful Thinking - Finding suggestions and 'buy' wishes from product reviews
Ramanand, J., Bhavsar, K., & Pedanekar, N. (2010) · Cited by 82 · see citing works
An empirical study of binary classifier fusion methods for multiclass classification
García‐Pedrajas, N., & Ortíz-Boyer, D. (2010) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2010.06.010 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
What kind of #conversation is Twitter? Mining #psycholinguistic cues for emergency coordination
Purohit, H., Hampton, A. J., Shalin, V. L., Sheth, A., Flach, J. M., & Bhatt, S. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.007 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Self-citationMining User Intents in Twitter: A Semi-Supervised Approach to Inferring Intent Categories for Tweets
Wang, J., Cong, G., Zhao, X. W., & Li, X. (2015) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9196 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Classifying and Characterizing Query Intent
Ashkan, A., Clarke, C. L. A., Agichtein, E., & Guo, Q. (2009) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-00958-7_53 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Intention Analysis for Sales, Marketing and Customer Service
Carlos, C. S., & Yalamanchi, M. (2012) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Towards linking buyers and sellers
Hollerit, B., Kröll, M., & Strohmaier, M. (2013) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2487788.2488009 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Binarization With Boosting and Oversampling for Multiclass Classification
Sen, A., Islam, M. M., Murase, K., & Yao, X. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2015.2423295 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Sequential patterns for text categorization
Jaillet, S., Laurent, A., & Teisseire, M. (2006) · Intelligent Data Analysis · doi:10.3233/ida-2006-10302 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
A Causal Model of Intentionality Judgment
Sloman, S. A., Fernbach, P. M., & EWING, S. (2012) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2012.01439.x · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Analyzing human intentions in natural language text
Kröll, M., & Strohmaier, M. (2009) · International Conference on Knowledge Capture · doi:10.1145/1597735.1597780 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Using Highly Expressive Contrast Patterns for Classification - Is It Worthwhile?
Loekito, E., & Bailey, J. (2009) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01307-2_44 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of Joint Intent Detection and Slot Filling Models in Natural Language Understanding
Weld, H., Huang, X., Long, S., Poon, J., & Han, S. C. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3547138 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Dwarakanath, L., Kamsin, A., Rasheed, R. A., Anandhan, A., & Shuib, L. M. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3074819 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Myint, P. Y. W., Lo, S. L., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103695 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Twitris: A System for Collective Social Intelligence
Sheth, A., Purohit, H., Smith, G. A., Brunn, J., Jadhav, A., Kapanipathi, P., Chen, L., & Wang, W. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_345 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationIntent Classification Using Feature Sets for Domestic Violence Discourse on Social Media
Subramani, S., Vu, H. Q., & Wang, H. (2017) · Asia-Pacific World Congress on Computer Science and Engineering (APWC on CSE) · doi:10.1109/apwconcse.2017.00030 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Modeling Feedback in Interaction With Conversational Agents—A Review
Axelsson, A., Buschmeier, H., & Skantze, G. (2022) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2022.744574 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“A similar high-level approach for tagging user speech in modern ASR systems is intent classification , where speech of some length, typically sentence-length or longer, is classified to approximate the intention (Ajzen, 1991) of the user (Purohit et al., 2015; Larson et al., 2019).”
BackgroundAn Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach for Detecting Empathy in Textual Communication
Montiel-Vázquez, E. C., Uresti, J. A. R., & Loyola‐González, O. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12199407 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Mining Textual and Imagery Instagram Data during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Amanatidis, D., Mylona, I., Kamenidou, I. E., Mamalis, S. A., & Stavrianea, A. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11094281 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Distributional Semantics Approach to Detect Intent in Twitter Conversations on Sexual Assaults
Pandey, R., Purohit, H., Stabile, B. B., & Grant, A. (2018) · IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence · doi:10.1109/wi.2018.00-80 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationChan, J. L., & Purohit, H. (2019) · Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness · doi:10.1017/dmp.2019.92 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationIntent Mining for the Good, Bad, and Ugly Use of Social Web: Concepts, Methods, and Challenges
Purohit, H., & Pandey, R. (2018) · Lecture notes in social networks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94105-9_1 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationKursuncu, U., Gaur, M., Lokala, U., Illendula, A., Thirunarayan, K., Daniulaityte, R., Sheth, A., & Arpinar, I. B. (2018) · IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence · doi:10.1109/wi.2018.00-50 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationA Context-Aware Hierarchical BERT Fusion Network for Multi-Turn Dialog Act Detection
Wu, T.-W., Su, R., & Juang, B.-H. F. (2021) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2021-95 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
LIDSNet: A Lightweight on-device Intent Detection model using Deep Siamese Network
Agarwal, V., Shivnikar, S. D., Ghosh, S. K., Arora, H., & Saini, Y. (2021) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla52953.2021.00182 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Mining Help Intent on Twitter During Disasters via Transfer Learning with Sparse Coding
Pedrood, B., & Purohit, H. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93372-6_16 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationSocial Media Mining for Disaster Management and Community Resilience
Purohit, H., & Peterson, S. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48099-8_5 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationLiang, D., Wu, Y., & Duan, W. (2023) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2023.02.070 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Robot Dialog System in the Context of Hospital Receptionist and its Demonstration
Hwang, E. J., Ahn, B. K., Lim, J. Y., MacDonald, B. A., & Ahn, H. S. (2022) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-021-00861-y · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Holguín‐Veras, J., Encarnación, T., Pérez-Guzmán, S., Cantillo, V., & Calderón, O. (2023) · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.trip.2023.100792 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Computational communication research
Matei, S. A., & Kee, K. F. (2019) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1304 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
OWI: Open-World Intent Identification Framework for Dialog Based System
Parmar, J., Soni, S., & Chouhan, S. S. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-66665-1_21 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Hierarchical deep learning for multi-label imbalanced text classification of economic literature
Lin, S., Frăsincar, F., & Klinkhamer, J. (2025) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2025.113189 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Hwang, E. J., Ahn, B. K., MacDonald, B. A., & Ahn, H. S. (2020) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra40945.2020.9197160 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Multimodal intent classification with incomplete modalities using text embedding propagation
Gonzaga, V. M., Murrugarra-Llerena, N., & Marcacini, R. M. (2021) · Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web · doi:10.1145/3470482.3479636 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Twitter content strategies to maximize engagement: The case of Thai Banks
Thongmak, M. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.108081 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Sentence Classification Using N-Grams in Urdu Language Text
Awan, M. D. A., Ali, S., Samad, A., Iqbal, N., Missen, M. M. S., & Ullah, N. (2021) · Scientific Programming · doi:10.1155/2021/1296076 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Mittal, T., Chowdhury, S., Guhan, P., Chelluri, S., & Manocha, D. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-60299-w · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Intent Recognition Leveraging XLM-RoBERTa for Effective NLU
Jayanth, K. K., Mohan, G. B., Kumar, R. P., & Rithani, M. (2024) · International Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence and Computing (ICAAIC) · doi:10.1109/icaaic60222.2024.10575275 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Symeonidis, S., Peikos, G., & Arampatzis, A. (2022) · Operational Research · doi:10.1007/s12351-022-00714-0 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Cui, C., Mao, W., Zheng, X., & Zeng, D. D. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67964-8_17 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Text-Based Intent Analysis using Deep Learning
Desai, V., Wadhwa, S., Anurag, A., & Bajaj, B. (2020) · International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) · doi:10.38124/ijisrt20jul342 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
A Bootstrapped Model to Detect Abuse and Intent in White Supremacist Corpora
Simons, B., & Skillicorn, D. B. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI) · doi:10.1109/isi49825.2020.9280551 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Event classification from the Urdu language text on social media
Awan, M. D. A., Kajla, N. I., Firdous, A., Husnain, M., & Missen, M. M. S. (2021) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.775 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Intent Classification of Users Conversation using BERT for Conversational Dialogue System
Chakraborty, S., Ohm, K. Y., Jeon, H., Kim, D. H., & Jin, H. J. (2023) · International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology · doi:10.23919/icact56868.2023.10079261 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Parallel Intent and Slot Prediction using MLB Fusion
Bhasin, A., Natarajan, B., Mathur, G., & Mangla, H. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC) · doi:10.1109/icsc.2020.00045 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
An Empirical Study on Collective Online Behaviors of Extremist Supporters
Kim, J., Liu, Y., Lim, W. Y., & Thing, V. L. L. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-69179-4_31 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Krishna, N. S., Tej, A. K., & Suchithra, M. S. (2021) · Smart innovation, systems and technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-6482-3_44 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Exploiting the Power of Group Differences: Using Patterns to Solve Data Analysis Problems
Dong, G. (2019) · Synthesis lectures on data mining and knowledge discovery · doi:10.2200/s00897ed1v01y201901dmk016 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationMishael, Q., & Ayesh, A. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.10380 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Twitris: A System for Collective Social Intelligence
Sheth, A., Purohit, H., Smith, G. A., Brunn, J., Jadhav, A., Kapanipathi, P., Chen, L., & Wang, W. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7163-9_345-1 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationBERT, RoBERTa, and DistilBERT for Intent Classification: A CLINC-150 Evaluation with QA Applications
Solanki, V. S., Sharma, E. S., Sindhu, L., Bisht, L., & Singh, H. (2025) · International Conference on Computing Technologies (ICOCT) · doi:10.1109/icoct64433.2025.11118772 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Bi-lingual Intent Classification of Twitter Posts: A Roadmap
Adekotujo, A. S., Lee, J., Enikuomehin, A. O., Mazzara, M., & Aribisala, B. S. (2019) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-14687-0_1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Montenegro, C., Santana, R., & Lozano, J. A. (2023) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2023.02.050 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Intent Classification by the Use of Automatically Generated Knowledge Graphs
Arčan, M., Manjunath, S. H., Robin, C., Verma, G., Pillai, D., Sarkar, S., Dutta, S., Assem, H., McCrae, J. P., & Paul Buitelaar, C. (2023) · Information · doi:10.3390/info14050288 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Bengali Intent Classification with Generative Adversarial BERT
Hasan, M., Basher, M. J. I., & Shawon, M. T. R. (2023) · International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) · doi:10.1109/iccit60459.2023.10440989 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Fuzzy Multi-intent Classifier For User Generated Software Documents
Vu, P. M., Nguyen, T. T., & Nguyen, T. T. (2020) · ACM Southeast Regional Conference (ACMSE) · doi:10.1145/3374135.3385300 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Sentiment, Stance, and Intent Detection in Turkish Tweets
Küçük, D. (2021) · Advances in data mining and database management book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-8061-5.ch011 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Extreme Learning Machine for Intent Classification of Web Data
Parth, Y., & Zhaoxia, W. (2017) · Proceedings in adaptation, learning and optimization · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57421-9_5 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Recognize user intents in online interactions from massive social media data
Cui, C., & Mao, W. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data Analysis (ICBDA) · doi:10.1109/icbda.2017.8078805 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Structured Summarization of Social Web for Smart Emergency Services by Uncertain Concept Graph
Purohit, H., Nannapaneni, S., Dubey, A. K., Karuna, P., & Biswas, G. (2018) · doi:10.1109/scope-gctc.2018.00012 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationFaria, F. T. J., Moin, M. B., Rahman, M. M., Shanto, M. M. A., Fahim, A. I., & Hoque, M. M. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-1758-6_32 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Users Intention Based on Twitter Features Using Text Analytics
Mishael, Q., Ayesh, A., & Yevseyeva, I. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33607-3_14 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Thai Commercial Banks on Twitter
Thongmak, M. (2023) · International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management · doi:10.4018/ijabim.321730 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Parallel Intent and Slot Prediction using MLB FusionPreprint
Bhasin, A., Natarajan, B., Mathur, G., & Mangla, H. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.09211
Peer Review #2 of "Event classification from the Urdu language text on social media (v0.1)"
(2021) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7287/peerj-cs.775v0.1/reviews/2
Peer Review #2 of "Event classification from the Urdu language text on social media (v0.2)"
(2021) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7287/peerj-cs.775v0.2/reviews/2
Peer Review #1 of "Event classification from the Urdu language text on social media (v0.1)"
(2021) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7287/peerj-cs.775v0.1/reviews/1
Peer Review #1 of "Event classification from the Urdu language text on social media (v0.2)"
(2021) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7287/peerj-cs.775v0.2/reviews/1
Peer Review #1 of "Event classification from the Urdu language text on social media (v0.4)"
(2021) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7287/peerj-cs.775v0.4/reviews/1
Peer Review #2 of "Event classification from the Urdu language text on social media (v0.4)"
(2021) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7287/peerj-cs.775v0.4/reviews/2
Stack Overflow Assistant Chatbot Using NLP Techniques
Arun Karthik, S., Makadia, S. S., Batra, J., & Ganesh, S. S. (2022) · International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science Engineering and Information Technology · doi:10.32628/cseit228557
Jerin Mahibha, C., Swaathi, C. M., Jeevitha, R., Martina, R. P., & Thenmozhi, D. (2023) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.semeval-1.154
Single-Turn Natural Language Understanding
Han, S. C., Weld, H., Li, Y., Lee, J., & Poon, J. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-74364-1_3
MSA-ITEI: A Novel Method for Multimodal Analysis of Social Media Stickers
Shi, Y., & Kong, F. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10889424
A Global Interactive and Bottleneck Fusion Model for Multi-intent Spoken Language Understanding
Guo, Y., Yu, Q., Wang, M., & Zhou, Y. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-6588-4_23
Agentic AI for Intent-Driven Network Optimization in 6G AAV-Assisted IoT
He, X., Wang, G., Cui, H., Yuan, R., & Zhao, H. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking · doi:10.1109/tccn.2026.3739457
- Authors
- Purohit, H., Dong, G., Shalin, V., Thirunarayan, K., & Sheth, A.
- Affiliations
- George Mason University (US)
- Wright State University (US)
- Venue
- 2015 IEEE International Conference on Smart City/SocialCom/SustainCom (SmartCity)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2015-12
- Pages
- 222-228
- OpenAlex
- W2237059446
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6
- FWCI
- 2.25
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- works.bepress.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Smart City/SocialCom/SustainCom (publishedVersion)
- CORE Scholar (Wright State University) (submittedVersion)
- Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) (submittedVersion)
- Journal of Bioresource Management (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text and Document Classification Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- intent classification, short text, social media, crisis events, multi-class classification, hybrid feature representation, psycholinguistics, ambiguity, emergency management, citizen participation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review