The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DeepDefense: Identifying DDoS Attack via Deep Learning
Abstract
Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks grow rapidly and become one of the fatal threats to the Internet. Automatically detecting DDoS attack packets is one of the main defense mechanisms. Conventional solutions monitor network traffic and identify attack activities from legitimate network traffic based on statistical divergence. Machine learning is another method to improve identifying performance based on statistical features. However, conventional machine learning techniques are limited by the shallow representation models. In this paper, we propose a deep learning based DDoS attack detection approach (DeepDefense). Deep learning approach can automatically extract high-level features from low-level ones and gain powerful representation and inference. We design a recurrent deep neural network to learn patterns from sequences of network traffic and trace network attack activities. The experimental results demonstrate a better performance of our model compared with conventional machine learning models. We reduce the error rate from 7.517% to 2.103% compared with conventional machine learning method in the larger data set.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818
Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling
Chung, J., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.3555 · Cited by 11,008
WaveNet: a generative model for raw audio
Oord, A. V. D., Dieleman, S., Zen, H., Simonyan, K., Vinyals, O., Graves, A., Kalchbrenner, N., Senior, A., & Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.03499 · Cited by 4,911
Cited by
Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for Intrusion Detection Systems: A Survey
Liu, H., & Lang, B. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9204396 · Cited by 1,133
Deep Learning Models for Cyber Security in IoT Networks
Roopak, M., Yun Tian, G., & Chambers, J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE 9th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC) · doi:10.1109/ccwc.2019.8666588 · Cited by 361
Bhardwaj, A., Mangat, V., Vig, R., Halder, S., & Conti, M. (2021) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100332 · Cited by 100
Towards Learning-automation IoT Attack Detection through Reinforcement Learning
Gu, T., Abhishek, A., Fu, H., Zhang, H., Basu, D., & Mohapatra, P. (2020) · 2020 IEEE 21st International Symposium on "A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks" (WoWMoM) · doi:10.1109/wowmom49955.2020.00029 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Yuan, X., Li, C., & Li, X.
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-05
- Pages
- 1-8
- OpenAlex
- W2625013748
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 19.07
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DeepDefense: Identifying DDoS Attack via Deep Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/smartcomp.2017.7946998
- The paper
- Yuan, X., Li, C., & Li, X. (2017). DeepDefense: Identifying DDoS Attack via Deep Learning. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP). https://doi.org/10.1109/smartcomp.2017.7946998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.