The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Autoencoder and Its Various Variants
Abstract
The concept of autoencoder was originally proposed by LeCun in 1987, early works on autoencoder were used for dimensionality reduction or feature learning. Recently, with the popularity of deep learning research, autoencoder has been brought to the forefront of generative modeling. Many variants of autoencoder have been proposed by different researchers and have been successfully applied in many fields, such as computer vision, speech recognition and natural language processing. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey on autoencoder and its various variants. Furthermore, we also present the lineage of the surveyed autoencoders. This paper can provide researchers engaged in related works with very valuable help.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes
Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6114 · Cited by 20,067
Cited by
Celard, P., Iglesias, E. L., Sorribes-Fdez, J. M., Romero, R., Vieira, A. S., & Borrajo, L. (2023) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-022-07953-4 · Cited by 188
Hughes, R. T., Zhu, L., & Bednarz, T. (2021) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2021.604234 · Cited by 178
Split Federated Learning for 6G Enabled-Networks: Requirements, Challenges, and Future Directions
Hafi, H., Brik, B., Frangoudis, P. A., Ksentini, A., & Bagaa, M. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3351600 · Cited by 90
A review on the recent applications of deep learning in predictive drug toxicological studies
Sinha, K., Ghosh, N., & Sil, P. C. (2023) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.2c00375 · Cited by 64
Punjabi, D., Huang, Y.-C., Holzhauer, L., Tremouilhac, P., Friederich, P., Jung, N., & Bräse, S. (2025) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-025-00960-2 · Cited by 12
Sudershan, B. (2023) · doi:10.1145/3610896 · Cited by 5
Punjabi, D., Huang, Y.-C., Holzhauer, L., Tremouilhac, P., Friederich, P., Jung, N., & Bräse, S. (2024) · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-7twhh · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhai, J., Zhang, S., Chen, J., & He, Q.
- Venue
- 2018 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-10
- Pages
- 415-419
- ISSN
- 1062-922X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2909431601
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 2.81
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
