Cited by 101Financial Markets and Investment StrategiesComplex Systems and Time Series AnalysisComplex Network Analysis Techniques

Decoding Social Influence and the Wisdom of the Crowd in Financial Trading Network

Open access
Wei Pan, Altshuler, Yaniv, Pentland, Alex·2012·2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing

Abstract

In this paper, we study roles of social mechanisms in a financial system. Our data come from a novel on-line foreign exchange trading brokerage for individual investors, which also allows investors to form social network ties between each other and copy others' trades. From the dataset, we analyze the dynamics of this connected social influence systems in decision making processes. We discover that generally social trades outperform individual trades, but the social reputation of the top traders is not completely determined by their performance due to social feedback even when users are betting their own money. We also find that social influence plays a significant role in users' trades, especially decisions during periods of uncertainty. We report evidences suggesting that the dynamics of social influence contribute to market overreaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/socialcom-passat.2012.133

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pan et al. (2012) find that followed traders are often but not always the most successful.

    “Using data from the copy trading platform eToro , Pan et al. (2012) find that followed traders are, often but not always, the most successful.”

    From Copy Trading (2020) · cites this paper as Pan et al. (2012)

  • Pan et al. (2012) show that users of the trading platform tend to increase the trading strategy volatility and market overreaction.

    “In addition, they show that users of the trading platform tend to increase the trading strategy volatility and market overreaction.”

    From Copy Trading (2020) · cites this paper as Pan et al. (2012)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pan, W., Altshuler, Y., & Pentland, A.
Affiliations
MIT Media Lab (US)
Venue
2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2012-09
Pages
203-209
OpenAlex
W2024453793
Cited by
101
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4
FWCI
19.68
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • International Conference on Social Computing (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
social influence, wisdom of crowds, retail investors, social learning, social reputation, social feedback, market overreaction, uncertainty, investor decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review