Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureVehicle emissions and performanceEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Life Cycle Assessment to Study the Impact of the Regional Grid Mix and Temperature Differences on the GHG Emissions of Battery Electric and Conventional Vehicles

Aljohani, Tawfiq, Alzahrani, Ghurmallah·2019·2019 SoutheastCon
DOI 10.1109/southeastcon42311.2019.9020666
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Electric Vehicles are one of the key factors for a sustainable energy future. Research has not conclusively verified whether or not transportation dependence on EVs achieves the suggested sustainability goals at the rate required by climate policy and science. In this study, we conduct a life cycle assessment to measure the impact of different regional energy mixes and climates temperatures, for both the electric and conventional vehicles. Specifically, we modeled the case of Los Angeles, California vs. Detroit, Michigan for current energy mixes for both cities in 2017, as well as the projected ones for 2020 and 2030 plans. Also, we compared the difference in GHG emissions produced in the two cities to value the impact of the variations in both the weather and generation portfolios. We used GREET, a full life cycle assessment model released by the Argonne National Laboratory of the Department of Energy. The results show that the geographical differences greatly influence the level of GHG emitted from the utilization of the EVs. Specifically, for the same level of driving (considering the same car model), the EVs in Los Angeles have lower GHG emissions than in Detroit. Furthermore, Detroit's lower ambient temperature for most of the year will result in higher levels in both GHG emission intensities and battery-charging inefficiencies. Additionally, the modeled energy grid mix for Michigan in all case scenarios (2017, 2020 and 2030) contains high percentage of coal as a fuel, compared to no coal at all in California's energy grid, making the EVs charging process in Detroit lead to more GHG emissions than in Los Angeles.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/southeastcon42311.2019.9020666

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. 2018, NASA NOAA data show 2016 warmest year on record globally
  2. aljohani, 2014, The Impact of EPA’s New Proposed Limits on the U.S. Power Industry, Int J Electr Energy, 2, 343
  3. 2015, Efficient driving behaviors to conserve fuel
  4. alexander, 2015, Environmental Assessment of a Full Electric Transportation Portfolio, Greenhouse Gas Emission Electric Power Research Institute, 2
  5. 2016, Find and compare cars 2015 Tesla Model S 85 kWh battery pack
  6. 2017, Mode-S Specification
  7. 2011, 2017-2025 Model year light-duty vehicle GHG emissions and CAFÉ Standards supplemental notice of intent
  8. 2014, Emissions & eneration Resource Integrated Database
  9. 2015, Plugged in How americans charge their electric vehicles
  10. nealer, 2015, Cleaner Cars from Cradle to Grave
  11. 2009, Table�1-35 U S Vehicles-Miles (Millions)
  12. 2016, Annual Energy Outlook 2016
  13. 2016, Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emission
  14. myhre, 2013, Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing. In: Climate Change 2013, The physical science basis Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
  15. 2016, Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emission
  16. 2016, The United States is pleased to communicate
  17. 2016, Annual Energy Outlook 2016
  18. 2010, Climate Data
  19. 2016, Public Acts of 2016, State of Michigan 98th Legislature
  20. 2014, Extreme temperatures affect electric vehicle driving range, AAA Research Center Southern California
  21. salisbury, 2015, Cold weather on road testing of a 2015 Nissan Leaf, Idaho National Laboratory

Cited by

See all 16

Related

Metadata

Authors
Aljohani, T., & Alzahrani, G.
Affiliations
  • Florida International University (US)
  • King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA)
ORCID
Aljohani, Tawfiq
Venue
2019 SoutheastCon
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-04
Pages
1-9
ISSN
1091-0050 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1109/southeastcon42311.2019.9020666
OpenAlex
W3012426919
Cited by
15
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4
FWCI
3.98
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
IEEE SoutheastCon (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle emissions and performance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
battery electric vehicles, internal combustion engine vehicles, greenhouse gas emissions, ambient temperature effects, battery charging efficiency, electricity generation portfolio, coal dependence, Los Angeles, Detroit, GREET model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.