The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Comparison of Commercial and Military Computer Security Policies
Abstract
Most discussions of computer security focus on control of disclosure. In Particular, the U.S. Department of Defense has developed a set of criteria for computer mechanisms to provide control of classified information. However, for that core of data processing concerned with business operation and control of assets, the primary security concern is data integrity. This paper presents a policy for data integrity based on commercial data processing practices, and compares the mechanisms needed for this policy with the mechanisms needed to enforce the lattice model for information security. We argue that a lattice model is not sufficient to characterize integrity policies, and that distinct mechanisms are needed to Control disclosure and to provide integrity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The NIST model for role-based access control: towards a unified standard
Sandhu, R., Ferraiolo, D., & Kuhn, R. (2000) · Proceedings of the fifth ACM workshop on Role-based access control · doi:10.1145/344287.344301 · Cited by 877
Peters, G. W., & Panayi, E. (2016) · New Economic Windows · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42448-4_13 · Cited by 686
Chainspace: A Sharded Smart Contracts Platform
Al-Bassam, M., Sonnino, A., Bano, S., Hrycyszyn, D., & Danezis, G. (2018) · Proceedings 2018 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2018.23241 · Cited by 359
A survey of cyber security management in industrial control systems
Knowles, W., Prince, D., Hutchison, D., Disso, J. F. P., & Jones, K. (2015) · International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection · doi:10.1016/j.ijcip.2015.02.002 · Cited by 344
Energy Theft in the Advanced Metering Infrastructure
McLaughlin, S., Podkuiko, D., & McDaniel, P. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14379-3_15 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Clark, D. D., & Wilson, D. R.
- Venue
- 1987 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 1987-04
- Pages
- 184-184
- ISSN
- 1081-6011 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2152505375
- Cited by
- 1,137
- References
- 0
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparison of Commercial and Military Computer Security Policies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/sp.1987.10001
- The paper
- Clark, D. D., & Wilson, D. R. (1987). A Comparison of Commercial and Military Computer Security Policies. 1987 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. https://doi.org/10.1109/sp.1987.10001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.