The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Privacy in e-commerce: examining user scenarios and privacy preferences
Open accessAbstract
Privacy is a necessary concern in electronic commerce.It is difficult, if not impossible, to complete a transaction without revealing some personal data -a shipping address, billing information, or product preference.Users may be unwilling to provide this necessary information or even to browse online if they believe their privacy is invaded or threatened.Fortunately, there are technologies to help users protect their privacy.P3P (Platform for Privacy Preferences Project) from the World Wide Web Consortium is one such technology.However, there is a need to know more about the range of user concerns and preferences about privacy in order to build usable and effective interface mechanisms for P3P and other privacy technologies.Accordingly, we conducted a survey of 381 U.S. Net users, detailing a range of commerce scenarios and examining the participants' concerns and preferences about privacy.This paper presents both the findings from that study as well as their design implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Culnan, M. J. (1993) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249775 · Cited by 618
TRUSTe: an online privacy seal program
Benassi, P. (1999) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/293411.293461 · Cited by 267
Cited by
An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions
Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0080 · Cited by 2,640
Privacy and rationality in individual decision making
Acquisti, A., & Grossklags, J. (2005) · IEEE Security and Privacy Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2005.22 · Cited by 1,123
Android permissions: user attention, comprehension, and behavior
Felt, A. P., Ha, E., Egelman, S., Haney, A., Chin, E., & Wagner, D. (2012) · Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security · doi:10.1145/2335356.2335360 · Cited by 1,022
Privacy, Trust, and Self-Disclosure Online
Joinson, A. N., Reips, U.-D., Buchanan, T., & Schofield, C. B. P. (2010) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370020903586662 · Cited by 503
Privacy and contextual integrity: framework and applications
Barth, A., Datta, A., Mitchell, J. C., & Nissenbaum, H. (2006) · 2006 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P'06) · doi:10.1109/sp.2006.32 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Ackerman, M. S., Cranor, L. F., & Reagle, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 1st ACM conference on Electronic commerce
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 1999-11
- Pages
- 1-8
- OpenAlex
- W2102357195
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 35.64
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Privacy in e-commerce: examining user scenarios and privacy preferences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/336992.336995
- The paper
- Ackerman, M. S., Cranor, L. F., & Reagle, J. (1999). Privacy in e-commerce: examining user scenarios and privacy preferences. Proceedings of the 1st ACM conference on Electronic commerce. https://doi.org/10.1145/336992.336995
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
