The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
User-Driven Access Control: Rethinking Permission Granting in Modern Operating Systems
Abstract
Modern client platforms, such as iOS, Android, Windows Phone, Windows 8, and web browsers, run each application in an isolated environment with limited privileges. A pressing open problem in such systems is how to allow users to grant applications access to user-owned resources, e.g., to privacy- and cost-sensitive devices like the camera or to user data residing in other applications. A key challenge is to enable such access in a way that is non-disruptive to users while still maintaining least-privilege restrictions on applications. In this paper, we take the approach of user-driven access control, whereby permission granting is built into existing user actions in the context of an application, rather than added as an afterthought via manifests or system prompts. To allow the system to precisely capture permission-granting intent in an application's context, we introduce access control gadgets (ACGs). Each user-owned resource exposes ACGs for applications to embed. The user's authentic UI interactions with an ACG grant the application permission to access the corresponding resource. Our prototyping and evaluation experience indicates that user-driven access control is a promising direction for enabling in-context, non-disruptive, and least-privilege permission granting on modern client platforms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Android permissions: user attention, comprehension, and behavior
Felt, A. P., Ha, E., Egelman, S., Haney, A., Chin, E., & Wagner, D. (2012) · Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security · doi:10.1145/2335356.2335360 · Cited by 1,022
Motiee, S., Hawkey, K., & Beznosov, K. (2010) · Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security · doi:10.1145/1837110.1837112 · Cited by 71
Cited by
Android permissions: user attention, comprehension, and behavior
Felt, A. P., Ha, E., Egelman, S., Haney, A., Chin, E., & Wagner, D. (2012) · Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security · doi:10.1145/2335356.2335360 · Cited by 1,022
Security Analysis of Emerging Smart Home Applications
Fernandes, E., Jung, J., & Prakash, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2016.44 · Cited by 689
Using ARM trustzone to build a trusted language runtime for mobile applications
Santos, N., Raj, H., Saroiu, S., & Wolman, A. (2014) · Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Architectural support for programming languages and operating systems · doi:10.1145/2541940.2541949 · Cited by 192
PMC: A Privacy-preserving Deep Learning Model Customization Framework for Edge Computing
Liu, B., Li, Y., Liu, Y., Guo, Y., & Chen, X. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3432208 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Roesner, F., Kohno, T., Moshchuk, A., Parno, B., Wang, H. J., & Cowan, C.
- Venue
- 2012 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2012-05
- Pages
- 224-238
- ISSN
- 1081-6011 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107881300
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 85.92
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: User-Driven Access Control: Rethinking Permission Granting in Modern Operating Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/sp.2012.24
- The paper
- Roesner, F., Kohno, T., Moshchuk, A., Parno, B., Wang, H. J., & Cowan, C. (2012). User-Driven Access Control: Rethinking Permission Granting in Modern Operating Systems. 2012 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. https://doi.org/10.1109/sp.2012.24
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.