Cited by 983Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionUser Authentication and Security SystemsInformation and Cyber Security

Android permissions

Felt, Adrienne Porter, Ha, Elizabeth, Egelman, Serge, Haney, Ariel, Chin, Erika, Wagner, David·2012·Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security

Abstract

Android's permission system is intended to inform users about the risks of installing applications. When a user installs an application, he or she has the opportunity to review the application's permission requests and cancel the installation if the permissions are excessive or objectionable. We examine whether the Android permission system is effective at warning users. In particular, we evaluate whether Android users pay attention to, understand, and act on permission information during installation. We performed two usability studies: an Internet survey of 308 Android users, and a laboratory study wherein we interviewed and observed 25 Android users. Study participants displayed low attention and comprehension rates: both the Internet survey and laboratory study found that 17% of participants paid attention to permissions during installation, and only 3% of Internet survey respondents could correctly answer all three permission comprehension questions. This indicates that current Android permission warnings do not help most users make correct security decisions. However, a notable minority of users demonstrated both awareness of permission warnings and reasonable rates of comprehension. We present recommendations for improving user attention and comprehension, as well as identify open challenges.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2335356.2335360

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. How Consumers Interact with Mobile App Advertising . Harris Interactive Survey , December 2011 . How Consumers Interact with Mobile App Advertising. Harris Interactive Survey, December 2011.
  2. Android Open Source Project . Android Security Overview , 2012 . Android Open Source Project. Android Security Overview, 2012.
  3. 10.5555/1190275.1190279 · DOI
  4. 10.5555/1387649.1387650 · DOI
  5. 10.5555/2002168.2002175 · DOI
  6. J. Howell and S. Schechter . What you see is what they get . In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Web 2.0 Security and Privacy (W2SP) , 2010 . J. Howell and S. Schechter. What you see is what they get. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Web 2.0 Security and Privacy (W2SP), 2010.
  7. K. Mueller and K. Butler . Flex-P: Flexible Android Permissions. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy , Poster Session , 2011 . K. Mueller and K. Butler. Flex-P: Flexible Android Permissions. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, Poster Session, 2011.
  8. P. Nickinson . Android Market now has more than a quarter-million applications , 2011 . P. Nickinson. Android Market now has more than a quarter-million applications, 2011.
  9. J. Sunshine , S. Egelman , H. Almuhimedi , N. Atri , and L. F. Cranor . Crying Wolf: An Empirical Study of SSL Warning Effectiveness . In Proceedings of the USENIX Security Symposium , 2009 . J. Sunshine, S. Egelman, H. Almuhimedi, N. Atri, and L. F. Cranor. Crying Wolf: An Empirical Study of SSL Warning Effectiveness. In Proceedings of the USENIX Security Symposium, 2009.
  10. H. Taylor . Most People are "Privacy Pragmatists" Who, While Concerned about Privacy , Will Sometimes Trade It Off for Other Benefits. Harris Interactive , March 2003 . H. Taylor. Most People are "Privacy Pragmatists" Who, While Concerned about Privacy, Will Sometimes Trade It Off for Other Benefits. Harris Interactive, March 2003.
  11. S. Thurm and Y. I. Kane . Your apps are watching you , 2010 . S. Thurm and Y. I. Kane. Your apps are watching you, 2010.
  12. 10.1201/9781482289688 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Felt, A. P., Ha, E., Egelman, S., Haney, A., Chin, E., & Wagner, D.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security
Publisher
ACM
Published
2012-07-11
Pages
1-14
OpenAlex
W2033811191
Cited by
983
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 110 · 2017: 95 · 2016: 124 · 2015: 93 · 2014: 97 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 23
FWCI
231.33
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security (publishedVersion)
Funders
Division of Computing and Communication Foundations (CCF-0424422)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
Keywords
Android permissions, user attention, security decision-making, user awareness, usability, mobile security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review