The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Practical Timing Side Channel Attacks against Kernel Space ASLR
Open accessAbstract
Due to the prevalence of control-flow hijacking attacks, a wide variety of defense methods to protect both user space and kernel space code have been developed in the past years. A few examples that have received widespread adoption include stack canaries, non-executable memory, and Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR). When implemented correctly (i.e., a given system fully supports these protection methods and no information leak exists), the attack surface is significantly reduced and typical exploitation strategies are severely thwarted. All modern desktop and server operating systems support these techniques and ASLR has also been added to different mobile operating systems recently. In this paper, we study the limitations of kernel space ASLR against a local attacker with restricted privileges. We show that an adversary can implement a generic side channel attack against the memory management system to deduce information about the privileged address space layout. Our approach is based on the intrinsic property that the different caches are shared resources on computer systems. We introduce three implementations of our methodology and show that our attacks are feasible on four different x86-based CPUs (both 32- and 64-bit architectures) and also applicable to virtual machines. As a result, we can successfully circumvent kernel space ASLR on current operating systems. Furthermore, we also discuss mitigation strategies against our attacks, and propose and implement a defense solution with negligible performance overhead.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yet another MicroArchitectural Attack: exploiting I-Cache
Aciiçmez, O. (2007) · Proceedings of the 2007 ACM workshop on Computer security architecture · doi:10.1145/1314466.1314469 · Cited by 232
Cited by
The Cybersecurity Landscape in Industrial Control Systems
McLaughlin, S., Konstantinou, C., Wang, X., Davi, L., Sadeghi, A.-R., Maniatakos, M., & Karri, R. (2016) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2015.2512235 · Cited by 391
Rowhammer.js: A Remote Software-Induced Fault Attack in JavaScript
Gruss, D., Maurice, C., & Mangard, S. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40667-1_15 · Cited by 373
Malware Guard Extension: Using SGX to Conceal Cache Attacks
Schwarz, M., Weiser, S., Gruss, D., Maurice, C., & Mangard, S. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60876-1_1 · Cited by 339
Leaky Cauldron on the Dark Land: Understanding Memory Side-Channel Hazards in SGX
Wang, W., Chen, G., Pan, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Bindschaedler, V., Tang, H., & Gunter, C. A. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3133956.3134038 · Cited by 320
No Need to Hide: Protecting Safe Regions on Commodity Hardware
Koning, K., Chen, X., Bos, H., Giuffrida, C., & Athanasopoulos, E. (2017) · Proceedings of the Twelfth European Conference on Computer Systems · doi:10.1145/3064176.3064217 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Hund, R., Willems, C., & Holz, T.
- Venue
- 2013 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2013-05
- Pages
- 191-205
- ISSN
- 1081-6011 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1964281299
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.16
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Practical Timing Side Channel Attacks against Kernel Space ASLR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/sp.2013.23
- The paper
- Hund, R., Willems, C., & Holz, T. (2013). Practical Timing Side Channel Attacks against Kernel Space ASLR. 2013 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. https://doi.org/10.1109/sp.2013.23
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.